vault backup: 2026-02-05 07:18:20
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
title: 2026-02-04 17:02:00
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- authorship/original
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/timestamped
|
||||
dg-publish: true
|
||||
---
|
||||
# [[2026-02-04]] 17:02:00
|
||||
|
||||
While observing takeoff for
|
||||
[[electrical-takeoff#Unit Condensing Units|unit condensing units]],
|
||||
the project engineer expressed confusion
|
||||
at the process of calculating average horizontal length,
|
||||
expressing that it was more complicated than they expected
|
||||
considering takeoff procedure for similar processes.
|
||||
The PE asked why we would not simply use the maximum
|
||||
so that we would not risk having too little overall.
|
||||
|
||||
Their expectation surprised me,
|
||||
since it is intuitive to me
|
||||
that there must be some limit to the logic of "covering it"
|
||||
since it is always within our power to add contingency,
|
||||
and especially because, if anything,
|
||||
I feel that our procedures tend towards
|
||||
the upper end of reasonable ECI.
|
||||
(see [[value-of-information.jpg]])
|
||||
|
||||
My response was not well formulated.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user