vault backup: 2025-10-03 15:08:33
This commit is contained in:
+86
-6
@@ -3,10 +3,56 @@ id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/fleeting
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/electrical
|
||||
- type/encyclopedia
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Feeder Sizing
|
||||
# Conductor Sizing
|
||||
|
||||
## "The 80% Rule"
|
||||
|
||||
"The 80% Rule" is a rule of thumb
|
||||
referring to a common convention of several articles
|
||||
including:
|
||||
|
||||
- [[nfpa-70_article-210_branch-circuits#210.19(A)(1) General.]]
|
||||
- [[nfpa-70_article-215_feeders#215.2(A)(1) General.]]
|
||||
|
||||
which paraphrased states:
|
||||
|
||||
> ... the minimum conductor size shall have an ampacity
|
||||
> not less than the noncontinuous load
|
||||
> plus 125 percent of the continuous load
|
||||
|
||||
When the rule is repeated,
|
||||
the noncontinuous load is ignored
|
||||
and it is stated that conductors are suitable
|
||||
for 80% their listed rating,
|
||||
since 80% is the reciprocal of 125%.
|
||||
|
||||
## Branch Circuits
|
||||
|
||||
### Receptacle Branch
|
||||
|
||||
> [!important]
|
||||
> There is no maximum number of receptacles per circuit _in any occupancy_.
|
||||
|
||||
It is a common misconception that the limit
|
||||
can be calculated with a formula like
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
\frac{1.25(180VA)}{120V} = 1.875A, \quad \frac{20A}{1.875A} = 10.\bar{6}
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
but the 180VA per yoke load specified in
|
||||
[[nfpa-70_article-220_load-calculations#220.14(I) Receptacle Outlets.|220.14(I)]]
|
||||
is specifically for calculating service and feeder sizing.
|
||||
|
||||
Per [[nfpa-70_article-210_branch-circuits#210.19(A)(1) General.|210.19(A)(1)]]
|
||||
a receptacle branch circuit's load
|
||||
is the load of the equipment intended to be served by it.
|
||||
|
||||
## Feeders
|
||||
|
||||
> [!cite] 250.122 Size of Equipment Grounding Conductors
|
||||
> **(A) General.** Copper, aluminum, or copper-clad aluminum
|
||||
@@ -37,15 +83,49 @@ Given a minimum ampacity, find all valid configurations.
|
||||
|
||||
Rank by total cost of install.
|
||||
|
||||
## Complexity to Ignore
|
||||
### Complexity to Ignore
|
||||
|
||||
### Conductor Material
|
||||
#### Conductor Material
|
||||
|
||||
Tinned copper and copper-clad aluminum conductors
|
||||
can be assumed out of scope.
|
||||
|
||||
## Complexity to Respect
|
||||
### Complexity to Respect
|
||||
|
||||
#### Equipment Grounding Conductor Material
|
||||
|
||||
Wire and EGC conductors are usually assumed to match,
|
||||
but it is sometimes preferable to use a copper EGC
|
||||
with high-amp aluminum parallel feeds.
|
||||
but it is sometimes necessary to use a copper EGC with aluminum wires,
|
||||
either for spec requirements or conduit fill considerations.
|
||||
|
||||
## Voltage Drop
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
V_d = \frac{ I \times R \times L \times M }{ P }
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
where
|
||||
- $V_d$ = Voltage Drop in volts ($V$)
|
||||
- $I$ = Current in Amperes ($A$)
|
||||
- $R$ = Linear resistance in ohms per foot ($\Omega\text{ft}^{-1}$)
|
||||
- $L$ = Length of wire one way in feet ($\text{ft}$)
|
||||
- $M$ = Multiplier
|
||||
- $2$ for 1-phase
|
||||
- $\sqrt{3}$ for 3-phase
|
||||
- $P$ = Number of parallel runs
|
||||
|
||||
It is often more useful to know the maximum length
|
||||
a certain wiring configuration is suitable for.
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
L = \frac{ V_d }{ I \times M } \times \frac{ P }{ R }
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
- $L$ = Max length of wire one way in feet ($\text{ft}$)
|
||||
- $\frac{ V_d }{ I \times M }$ = Max circuit resistance in ohms ($\Omega$)
|
||||
- $\frac{ P }{ R }$ = ??? in feet per ohm ($\text{ft}\Omega^{-1}$)
|
||||
|
||||
> [!info] Ohm's Law
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
> V = I \times R, \quad R = \frac{ V }{ I }, \quad I = \frac{ V }{ R }
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user