vault backup: 2026-01-08 16:57:50
This commit is contained in:
+23
-2
@@ -74,12 +74,33 @@ like it was for my mentors and peers at Ace.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-01-07 12:13
|
||||
|
||||
#occupational #topic/estimating #topic/organization
|
||||
|
||||
Just now Jorge admonished another peer
|
||||
for using insulated wire for pool bonding.
|
||||
for using insulated wire for pool bonding,
|
||||
his rational was flawed beyond saving
|
||||
(something about the difference between bonding and grounding),
|
||||
but stemmed from a frustratingly common misunderstanding
|
||||
that our Accubid assemblies are intended to be an accurate list
|
||||
of the material to be installed.
|
||||
|
||||
They are not.
|
||||
If they were intended to be accurate,
|
||||
there would need to be several times as many.
|
||||
They are a compromise between accuracy and estimator effort.
|
||||
It should be assumed that for common scope,
|
||||
at least one assembly should be acceptable as-is.
|
||||
|
||||
Pool bonding is required for at least a quarter of our jobs.
|
||||
We have no bonding assemblies with bare wire.
|
||||
Therefore it must be assumed that it was determined
|
||||
that it would be acceptable to represent bare wire bonding with insulated wire items,
|
||||
because otherwise it would be necessary to have double the assemblies,
|
||||
or to ec
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-01-07 16:03
|
||||
|
||||
#occupational #topic/organization
|
||||
#occupational #topic/estimating #topic/organization
|
||||
|
||||
There is a palpable animosity for [[pdi-estimating#Bid Estimating|Bid]]
|
||||
in [[pdi-estimating#Construction Estimating (ConEst)|ConEst]],
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user