vault backup: 2026-06-05 12:41:25
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: 2026-06-05T09:48:37-0400
|
||||
title: 2026-06-05 09:48:37
|
||||
tags: []
|
||||
daily: "[[2026-06-05]]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
# 2026-06-05 09:48:37
|
||||
|
||||
## Accubid Reverse Takeoff
|
||||
|
||||
I have mixed feelings
|
||||
about using negative or "reverse" takeoffs
|
||||
in [[accubid|Accubid]].
|
||||
|
||||
### Pros
|
||||
|
||||
Pros as an alternative to simply changing existing counts.
|
||||
|
||||
With more than one revision,
|
||||
it quickly becomes difficult to have confidence in count changes.
|
||||
|
||||
### Cons
|
||||
|
||||
This note specifically concerns using negative quantities
|
||||
to cancel out positive for breakdown purposes,
|
||||
which I suspect is the only practical purpose for them.
|
||||
Net negative quantities cause all kinds of problems.
|
||||
There is no link from the positive to the negative,
|
||||
so any change to the former must be repeated for the latter.
|
||||
|
||||
With more than one revision,
|
||||
determining net takeoff quickly becomes unwieldy.
|
||||
|
||||
LiveCount "un-reverses" reverse takeoffs
|
||||
when adding or deleting from an existing run,
|
||||
which is not intuitive or well known.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user