vault backup: 2025-12-11 12:38:04
This commit is contained in:
@@ -14,12 +14,16 @@ tags:
|
||||
|
||||
#occupational/takeoff #topic/ambiguity #topic/transparency
|
||||
|
||||
Related: [[lighting-controls-takeoff]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Minutes
|
||||
|
||||
2025-12-10 08:30--10:00
|
||||
|
||||
Objective: Discuss lighting control systems
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
|
||||
A primary reason for the discussion was presented:
|
||||
|
||||
> [!example] ^ex
|
||||
@@ -31,6 +35,8 @@ A primary reason for the discussion was presented:
|
||||
> When the project team received a quote for a "per code" system,
|
||||
> the total was ~$600,000.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
|
||||
Ultimately the responsibility is ConEst's
|
||||
to resolve discrepancies between:
|
||||
* applicable code
|
||||
@@ -38,6 +44,8 @@ to resolve discrepancies between:
|
||||
* Bid proposal intent
|
||||
* PDR quote intent
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
|
||||
It was erroneously suggested that lighting control conductors
|
||||
may be run with their circuit conductors if both are 600V insulated.[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user