vault backup: 2025-07-08 07:25:20
This commit is contained in:
@@ -6,8 +6,10 @@ by Douglas W. Hubbard
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Takeaways
|
||||
|
||||
Qualititative risk analysis
|
||||
(i.e. risk matricies, scoring charts)
|
||||
### Qualitative Metrics Must Be Avoided
|
||||
|
||||
Qualitative risk analysis
|
||||
(i.e. risk matrices, scoring charts)
|
||||
departs from legitimate statistical methodology
|
||||
and has no robust evidence to suggest its efficacy.
|
||||
There is good reason to believe that such methods
|
||||
@@ -15,11 +17,26 @@ are deleterious to their intended purpose
|
||||
in contradiction to the common response
|
||||
that they are "better than nothing".
|
||||
|
||||
### Utility as a Measure of Value
|
||||
|
||||
Expected Value (Probability × Magnitude)
|
||||
alone can not predict or inform risky decisions,
|
||||
except for risk-neutral parties.
|
||||
People and organizations are risk-averse
|
||||
~~TODO: see chapter 6~~
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
* [ ] Finish this paragraph. (see chapter 6) ➕ 2025-07-04
|
||||
|
||||
### Expert Opinion Must Be ~~Adjusted~~
|
||||
|
||||
Expert opinion is valuable despite its flaws.
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
The book details the statistically observable tendency for people
|
||||
to underestimate risk and to be overconfident in their beliefs.
|
||||
It describes the process of "calibration"
|
||||
by which people can be trained to compensate for this bias
|
||||
and make predictions far more accurately.
|
||||
|
||||
## Mentioned Topics and Abbreviations
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user