vault backup: 2025-07-08 07:25:20
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4,9 +4,15 @@ In [[decision-theory]], the expected value of perfect information (EVPI)
|
|||||||
is the price that one would be willing to pay
|
is the price that one would be willing to pay
|
||||||
in order to gain access to [[perfect-information]]
|
in order to gain access to [[perfect-information]]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The perceived *value* of decreased uncertainty
|
||||||
|
must be weighed against its *cost*.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This concept provides the basis for the solution of one or more [[open-problems]].
|
This concept provides the basis for the solution of one or more [[open-problems]].
|
||||||
To reduce [[risk]] in [[construction-estimating]],
|
To reduce [[risk]] in [[construction-estimating]],
|
||||||
an organization pays in estimator hours.
|
an organization pays in estimator hours.
|
||||||
These hours have a direct cost in salary and benefits,
|
These hours have a direct cost in salary and benefits,
|
||||||
however the greater cost is the opportunity cost
|
however the greater cost is the opportunity cost
|
||||||
of tying up an estimator who could otherwise be starting a new project.
|
of tying up an estimator who could otherwise be starting a new project.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In many cases, the utility of doubled throughput
|
||||||
|
far outweighs the increased risk of individual bids.
|
||||||
@@ -2,13 +2,6 @@
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
Expected value of perfect information (EVPI)
|
Expected value of perfect information (EVPI)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The perceived *value* of decreased uncertainty
|
|
||||||
must be weighed against its *cost*.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Takeoff purchases certainty with estimator hours.
|
|
||||||
Estimator hours have a not insubstantial real cost in salary and burden,
|
|
||||||
however the opportunity cost may exceed this.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Count-based takeoff speed increases with count.
|
Count-based takeoff speed increases with count.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
***
|
***
|
||||||
@@ -27,4 +20,4 @@ their success being a matter of perspective.
|
|||||||
## Naming Conventions (Use Case vs. Description)
|
## Naming Conventions (Use Case vs. Description)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Naming by use case is intuitive for those without estimating or field experience,
|
Naming by use case is intuitive for those without estimating or field experience,
|
||||||
but has the side effect that those acustomed to the names will inevitably treat them as descriptive.
|
but has the side effect that those accustomed to the names will inevitably treat them as descriptive.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -6,8 +6,10 @@ by Douglas W. Hubbard
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
## Key Takeaways
|
## Key Takeaways
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Qualititative risk analysis
|
### Qualitative Metrics Must Be Avoided
|
||||||
(i.e. risk matricies, scoring charts)
|
|
||||||
|
Qualitative risk analysis
|
||||||
|
(i.e. risk matrices, scoring charts)
|
||||||
departs from legitimate statistical methodology
|
departs from legitimate statistical methodology
|
||||||
and has no robust evidence to suggest its efficacy.
|
and has no robust evidence to suggest its efficacy.
|
||||||
There is good reason to believe that such methods
|
There is good reason to believe that such methods
|
||||||
@@ -15,11 +17,26 @@ are deleterious to their intended purpose
|
|||||||
in contradiction to the common response
|
in contradiction to the common response
|
||||||
that they are "better than nothing".
|
that they are "better than nothing".
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Utility as a Measure of Value
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Expected Value (Probability × Magnitude)
|
Expected Value (Probability × Magnitude)
|
||||||
alone can not predict or inform risky decisions,
|
alone can not predict or inform risky decisions,
|
||||||
except for risk-neutral parties.
|
except for risk-neutral parties.
|
||||||
People and organizations are risk-averse
|
People and organizations are risk-averse
|
||||||
~~TODO: see chapter 6~~
|
...
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [ ] Finish this paragraph. (see chapter 6) ➕ 2025-07-04
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Expert Opinion Must Be ~~Adjusted~~
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Expert opinion is valuable despite its flaws.
|
||||||
|
...
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The book details the statistically observable tendency for people
|
||||||
|
to underestimate risk and to be overconfident in their beliefs.
|
||||||
|
It describes the process of "calibration"
|
||||||
|
by which people can be trained to compensate for this bias
|
||||||
|
and make predictions far more accurately.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Mentioned Topics and Abbreviations
|
## Mentioned Topics and Abbreviations
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -16,7 +16,8 @@ For some owners, money is no object,
|
|||||||
and standardization is far more important
|
and standardization is far more important
|
||||||
than any potential construction savings.
|
than any potential construction savings.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
These owners can be expected to decline every [[value-engineering]] option offered.
|
These owners can be expected to decline every [[value-engineering]] option offered
|
||||||
|
(see [[gold-plating]]).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## For the Contractor
|
## For the Contractor
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
+20
-4
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
The field of strategy is concerned with the optimal solutions of problematic scenarios.
|
The field of strategy is concerned with the optimal solutions of problematic scenarios.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Decision Theory
|
## Disciplines
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Decision Theory
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Decision theory concerns
|
Decision theory concerns
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -10,14 +12,28 @@ Decision theory concerns
|
|||||||
~~no competition~~
|
~~no competition~~
|
||||||
~~internal optimization~~
|
~~internal optimization~~
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Game Theory
|
### Game Theory
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Game theory concerns decisions made in competition with other intelligent actors.
|
Game theory concerns decisions made in competition with other intelligent actors.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Predictions of competitor behavior in bids and market movements
|
Predictions of competitor behavior in bids and market movements
|
||||||
are made with a game-theoretic lens.
|
are made with a game-theoretic lens.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Auction Theory
|
#### Auction Theory
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Auction theory is a subset of game theory
|
Auction theory is a subset of game theory
|
||||||
that specifically addresses the
|
that specifically addresses the competitive bid format
|
||||||
|
typical of construction project award.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## In Construction Contracting
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Executives** inform **Risk Tolerance**
|
||||||
|
**Risk Tolerance** informs **Minimum Estimate Certainty**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Bid Strategy
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Project cost certainty
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### Expected Competition
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Estimation Strategy
|
||||||
+2
-1
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
|
|||||||
# Supertopics
|
# Supertopics
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Supertopics are a concept I use to visualize and categorize my knowledge and interests.
|
Supertopics are a concept that I use
|
||||||
|
to visualize and categorize my knowledge and interests.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user