vault backup: 2025-07-08 07:25:20
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4,9 +4,15 @@ In [[decision-theory]], the expected value of perfect information (EVPI)
|
||||
is the price that one would be willing to pay
|
||||
in order to gain access to [[perfect-information]]
|
||||
|
||||
The perceived *value* of decreased uncertainty
|
||||
must be weighed against its *cost*.
|
||||
|
||||
This concept provides the basis for the solution of one or more [[open-problems]].
|
||||
To reduce [[risk]] in [[construction-estimating]],
|
||||
an organization pays in estimator hours.
|
||||
These hours have a direct cost in salary and benefits,
|
||||
however the greater cost is the opportunity cost
|
||||
of tying up an estimator who could otherwise be starting a new project.
|
||||
|
||||
In many cases, the utility of doubled throughput
|
||||
far outweighs the increased risk of individual bids.
|
||||
@@ -2,13 +2,6 @@
|
||||
|
||||
Expected value of perfect information (EVPI)
|
||||
|
||||
The perceived *value* of decreased uncertainty
|
||||
must be weighed against its *cost*.
|
||||
|
||||
Takeoff purchases certainty with estimator hours.
|
||||
Estimator hours have a not insubstantial real cost in salary and burden,
|
||||
however the opportunity cost may exceed this.
|
||||
|
||||
Count-based takeoff speed increases with count.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
@@ -27,4 +20,4 @@ their success being a matter of perspective.
|
||||
## Naming Conventions (Use Case vs. Description)
|
||||
|
||||
Naming by use case is intuitive for those without estimating or field experience,
|
||||
but has the side effect that those acustomed to the names will inevitably treat them as descriptive.
|
||||
but has the side effect that those accustomed to the names will inevitably treat them as descriptive.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -6,8 +6,10 @@ by Douglas W. Hubbard
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Takeaways
|
||||
|
||||
Qualititative risk analysis
|
||||
(i.e. risk matricies, scoring charts)
|
||||
### Qualitative Metrics Must Be Avoided
|
||||
|
||||
Qualitative risk analysis
|
||||
(i.e. risk matrices, scoring charts)
|
||||
departs from legitimate statistical methodology
|
||||
and has no robust evidence to suggest its efficacy.
|
||||
There is good reason to believe that such methods
|
||||
@@ -15,11 +17,26 @@ are deleterious to their intended purpose
|
||||
in contradiction to the common response
|
||||
that they are "better than nothing".
|
||||
|
||||
### Utility as a Measure of Value
|
||||
|
||||
Expected Value (Probability × Magnitude)
|
||||
alone can not predict or inform risky decisions,
|
||||
except for risk-neutral parties.
|
||||
People and organizations are risk-averse
|
||||
~~TODO: see chapter 6~~
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
* [ ] Finish this paragraph. (see chapter 6) ➕ 2025-07-04
|
||||
|
||||
### Expert Opinion Must Be ~~Adjusted~~
|
||||
|
||||
Expert opinion is valuable despite its flaws.
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
The book details the statistically observable tendency for people
|
||||
to underestimate risk and to be overconfident in their beliefs.
|
||||
It describes the process of "calibration"
|
||||
by which people can be trained to compensate for this bias
|
||||
and make predictions far more accurately.
|
||||
|
||||
## Mentioned Topics and Abbreviations
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -16,7 +16,8 @@ For some owners, money is no object,
|
||||
and standardization is far more important
|
||||
than any potential construction savings.
|
||||
|
||||
These owners can be expected to decline every [[value-engineering]] option offered.
|
||||
These owners can be expected to decline every [[value-engineering]] option offered
|
||||
(see [[gold-plating]]).
|
||||
|
||||
## For the Contractor
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+20
-4
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
||||
|
||||
The field of strategy is concerned with the optimal solutions of problematic scenarios.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision Theory
|
||||
## Disciplines
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision Theory
|
||||
|
||||
Decision theory concerns
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10,14 +12,28 @@ Decision theory concerns
|
||||
~~no competition~~
|
||||
~~internal optimization~~
|
||||
|
||||
## Game Theory
|
||||
### Game Theory
|
||||
|
||||
Game theory concerns decisions made in competition with other intelligent actors.
|
||||
|
||||
Predictions of competitor behavior in bids and market movements
|
||||
are made with a game-theoretic lens.
|
||||
|
||||
### Auction Theory
|
||||
#### Auction Theory
|
||||
|
||||
Auction theory is a subset of game theory
|
||||
that specifically addresses the
|
||||
that specifically addresses the competitive bid format
|
||||
typical of construction project award.
|
||||
|
||||
## In Construction Contracting
|
||||
|
||||
**Executives** inform **Risk Tolerance**
|
||||
**Risk Tolerance** informs **Minimum Estimate Certainty**
|
||||
|
||||
### Bid Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
Project cost certainty
|
||||
|
||||
#### Expected Competition
|
||||
|
||||
### Estimation Strategy
|
||||
+2
-1
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
|
||||
# Supertopics
|
||||
|
||||
Supertopics are a concept I use to visualize and categorize my knowledge and interests.
|
||||
Supertopics are a concept that I use
|
||||
to visualize and categorize my knowledge and interests.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user