vault backup: 2025-10-21 17:03:44
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- occupational
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Wiring Methods Selection
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Wiring Methods Selection
|
||||
|
||||
Seek to use the cheapest method,
|
||||
as determined by Senior Construction Estimator
|
||||
and Database Administrator,
|
||||
as allowed for the situation.
|
||||
|
||||
![[pre-takeoff-research#Requirement Precedence]]
|
||||
|
||||
## By Construction Type
|
||||
|
||||
See [[ibc-construction-types]] for more info.
|
||||
|
||||
### Construction Types I, II
|
||||
|
||||
Nonmetallic-sheathed cables (NM, SE, etc.)
|
||||
are not fire code permissible in these types.
|
||||
|
||||
PVC < MC < EMT < IMC < RMC
|
||||
|
||||
### Construction Types III, IV, V
|
||||
|
||||
NM/SE < PVC < EMT < IMC < RMC
|
||||
|
||||
## By Wiring Method
|
||||
|
||||
### Electrical Metallic Tubing (EMT)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Fittings
|
||||
|
||||
Set-screw < compression
|
||||
|
||||
> [!info]
|
||||
> EMT has a third coupling type "indenter",
|
||||
> which are crimped onto the conduit using a special tool.
|
||||
> These are usually only mentioned in specifications
|
||||
> to say that they are unacceptable.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!info] Edge Case: Vanderbilt Central Neighborhood Residential College
|
||||
>
|
||||
> > [!cite] Vanderbilt Central Neighborhood Residential College - Project Specifications (pp.)
|
||||
> > Fittings for Type EMT Duct Raceways:
|
||||
> > * Coupling Method: Compression coupling or Setscrew coupling.
|
||||
> > Setscrew couplings with only single screw per conduit are unacceptable.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> > [!quote] Joel Jansen via Microsoft Teams @ 2025-10-15 09:33 AM
|
||||
> > use set screw 🙂
|
||||
|
||||
### Rigid Polyvinyl Chloride Conduit (PVC)
|
||||
|
||||
Not usually permissible exposed indoors in any construction,
|
||||
except in Florida.
|
||||
|
||||
May require rigid stub-ups in certain cases,
|
||||
which could make EMT more cost-effective.
|
||||
Consult with the Senior Construction Estimator in this case.
|
||||
|
||||
## By Use-Case
|
||||
|
||||
### Multi-Circuit Homeruns
|
||||
|
||||
> [!quote] Art Baldwin (pp.)
|
||||
> Multi-circuit MC is not cost-effective
|
||||
> when considering the difficulty of rework.
|
||||
> Use conduit, even EMT if necessary.
|
||||
|
||||
## By Market Type
|
||||
|
||||
### Assisted Living
|
||||
|
||||
MC-AP may be required.
|
||||
|
||||
## Searching Specifications
|
||||
|
||||
> [!info] Example Specs Relevant to Wiring Methods Selection
|
||||
> * 26XXXX - Raceway And Boxes For Electrical Systems
|
||||
> * 26XXXX - Conduits For Electrical Systems
|
||||
> * 26XXXX - Underground Ducts And Raceways For Electrical Systems
|
||||
>
|
||||
> * 26XXXX - Low-Voltage Electrical Power Conductors And Cables
|
||||
>
|
||||
> * 26XXXX - General Requirements For Electrical
|
||||
> * 26XXXX - Common Work Results For Electrical
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user