vault backup: 2025-10-03 15:08:11
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/fleeting
|
||||
- topic/electrical
|
||||
- type/encyclopedia
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Feeder Sizing
|
||||
|
||||
> [!cite] 250.122 Size of Equipment Grounding Conductors
|
||||
> **(A) General.** Copper, aluminum, or copper-clad aluminum
|
||||
> equipment grounding conductors of the wire type
|
||||
> shall not be smaller than shown in Table 250.122,
|
||||
> but in no case shall they be required to be larger
|
||||
> than the circuit conductors supplying the equipment...
|
||||
|
||||
Apparently in the 2026 NEC First Draft Meetings,
|
||||
Code Making Panel 5 clarified that the equipment grounding conductor (EGC)
|
||||
never needs to be larger than the largest ungrounded conductor in any raceway
|
||||
when installed in parallel.
|
||||
I can not find a source to verify this.
|
||||
Statements from other reputable sources including Mike Holt
|
||||
are in contradiction to this idea.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
|
||||
Given a minimum ampacity, find all valid configurations.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!cite] 310.10(H) Conductors in Parallel.
|
||||
> **(1) General.** Aluminum, copper-clad aluminum, or copper conductors,
|
||||
> for each phase, polarity, neutral, or grounded circuit
|
||||
> shall be permitted to be connected in parallel
|
||||
> (electrically joined at both ends)
|
||||
> _only in sizes 1/0 AWG and larger_
|
||||
> where installed in accordance with 310.10(H)(2) through (H)(6).
|
||||
|
||||
Rank by total cost of install.
|
||||
|
||||
## Complexity to Ignore
|
||||
|
||||
### Conductor Material
|
||||
|
||||
Tinned copper and copper-clad aluminum conductors
|
||||
can be assumed out of scope.
|
||||
|
||||
## Complexity to Respect
|
||||
|
||||
Wire and EGC conductors are usually assumed to match,
|
||||
but it is sometimes preferable to use a copper EGC
|
||||
with high-amp aluminum parallel feeds.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user