diff --git a/2025-11-13_08-19-01.md b/2025-11-13_08-19-01.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2a58cdb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2025-11-13_08-19-01.md
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+## 2025-11-13 ??:??:??
+
+#occupational
+
+### Questions for Bid Estimators
+
+Questions for [[pdi-estimating#Bid Estimating|PDI Bid Estimators]].
+
+#### Exclusions
+
+When we send proposals with significant exclusions
+(no lighting control, no demo, no submetering,
+even when designed and shown on drawings):
+
+Is there a conversation happening with our customers
+before they receive our proposal?
+
+Is it clear they understand what we're excluding?
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/2026-01-12_13-02-01.md b/2026-01-12_13-02-01.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..afe2e68
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2026-01-12_13-02-01.md
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+# 2026-01-12 13:02:??
+
+#occupational
+
+Joel attributes the [[#GP Variance|apparent variance]] to
+1. missed Polaris lugs for feeders for one building,
+2. insufficient budget for equipment rental, and
+3. upfront costs already paid (construction is 50% complete).
+
+He also said that operations accused ConEst
+of providing insufficient length for subfeeds,
+which he said was true,
+but not to the extent accused
+(only ~600ft missed total).
+
+The award WBS shows $32,382 for equipment rental
+
+I'm dubious of all these explanations,
+but I don't have another one.
+I can't find the ConEst folder or Accubid file.
diff --git a/timestamped/2025-11-13_08-19-00.md b/timestamped/2025-11-13_08-19-00.md
index d92a9f9..4623cc9 100644
--- a/timestamped/2025-11-13_08-19-00.md
+++ b/timestamped/2025-11-13_08-19-00.md
@@ -25,21 +25,4 @@ where instrumental methods are presented as if they were realist,
 causing confusion when the methods are,
 as judged from a realist perspective, wrong.
 
-## 2025-11-13 ??:??:??
-
-#occupational
-
-### Questions for Bid Estimators
-
-Questions for [[pdi-estimating#Bid Estimating|PDI Bid Estimators]].
-
-#### Exclusions
-
-When we send proposals with significant exclusions
-(no lighting control, no demo, no submetering,
-even when designed and shown on drawings):
-
-Is there a conversation happening with our customers
-before they receive our proposal?
-
-Is it clear they understand what we're excluding?
\ No newline at end of file
+[[2025-11-13_08-19-01]]
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/timestamped/2026-01-12_13-02-00.md b/timestamped/2026-01-12_13-02-00.md
index 28379b1..3c02530 100644
--- a/timestamped/2026-01-12_13-02-00.md
+++ b/timestamped/2026-01-12_13-02-00.md
@@ -10,24 +10,3 @@ dg-publish: true
 
 **Dry utilities:** utilities other than "wet" utilities (water, sewer, stormwater),
 namely power, data, and natural gas.
-
-# 2026-01-12 13:02:??
-
-#occupational
-
-Joel attributes the [[#GP Variance|apparent variance]] to
-1. missed Polaris lugs for feeders for one building,
-2. insufficient budget for equipment rental, and
-3. upfront costs already paid (construction is 50% complete).
-
-He also said that operations accused ConEst
-of providing insufficient length for subfeeds,
-which he said was true,
-but not to the extent accused
-(only ~600ft missed total).
-
-The award WBS shows $32,382 for equipment rental
-
-I'm dubious of all these explanations,
-but I don't have another one.
-I can't find the ConEst folder or Accubid file.