Vault backup 2025-07-17

This commit is contained in:
2025-07-17 17:03:58 -04:00
parent a5799ce284
commit 7ee4c0ed95
14 changed files with 128 additions and 32 deletions
+16
View File
@@ -9,6 +9,17 @@ That said, the correct answer is this.
> As detailed as possible, given required turnaround and available estimating resources.
%%
TODO: This analysis is not much better than the common belief.
A commonality of both is the implication that more time ought to be preferred,
when the reality is that when considering larger organizational factors (strategy),
ideal estimate certainty is likely far lower than most expect.
The *correct* correct answer involves optimizing for these factors:
* value of increased bid certainty
* value of increased estimate volume
%%
An estimate's detail is irrelevant to its quality.
A less detailed estimate is a more [[risk]]y bid,
but **it is not the role of the estimator to determine acceptable risk**.
@@ -33,3 +44,8 @@ $\frac{d\sigma}{dt}$
Time-saving strategies will overestimate or underestimate detailed takeoff
depending on the assumptions used in their creation.
## Human Error
It is commonly understood that a "detailed takeoff"
is more "accurate" than a square foot estimate.