Vault backup 2025-07-17
This commit is contained in:
@@ -9,6 +9,17 @@ That said, the correct answer is this.
|
||||
|
||||
> As detailed as possible, given required turnaround and available estimating resources.
|
||||
|
||||
%%
|
||||
TODO: This analysis is not much better than the common belief.
|
||||
A commonality of both is the implication that more time ought to be preferred,
|
||||
when the reality is that when considering larger organizational factors (strategy),
|
||||
ideal estimate certainty is likely far lower than most expect.
|
||||
|
||||
The *correct* correct answer involves optimizing for these factors:
|
||||
* value of increased bid certainty
|
||||
* value of increased estimate volume
|
||||
%%
|
||||
|
||||
An estimate's detail is irrelevant to its quality.
|
||||
A less detailed estimate is a more [[risk]]y bid,
|
||||
but **it is not the role of the estimator to determine acceptable risk**.
|
||||
@@ -33,3 +44,8 @@ $\frac{d\sigma}{dt}$
|
||||
|
||||
Time-saving strategies will overestimate or underestimate detailed takeoff
|
||||
depending on the assumptions used in their creation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Human Error
|
||||
|
||||
It is commonly understood that a "detailed takeoff"
|
||||
is more "accurate" than a square foot estimate.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user