Vault backup 2025-07-17
This commit is contained in:
@@ -9,5 +9,5 @@
|
||||
|
||||
Breakdown selection is straightforward.
|
||||
|
||||
Still need a solution to select all takeoffs.
|
||||
To select all takeoffs:
|
||||
Get top left corner of pane, offset down and right.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
|
||||
# Project Info
|
||||
|
||||
Standardize formatting and input methods for common
|
||||
(mostly multi-family specific)
|
||||
project info, including:
|
||||
|
||||
* level names
|
||||
* area types by level
|
||||
* switchgear by level
|
||||
* feeders
|
||||
* from->to's with feeder tags
|
||||
* feeder tag definitions
|
||||
|
||||
To calculate regular quantities
|
||||
|
||||
* sleeving
|
||||
* conductor support
|
||||
@@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ All control methods are likely to appear in drawings.
|
||||
* Digital
|
||||
* Wireless
|
||||
|
||||
> [!info] "Local Control"
|
||||
> The term "local control only" is sometimes used to indicate no condiseration
|
||||
> for *any* lighting control beyond standard devices,
|
||||
> (with $Ds being the triac type)
|
||||
> [!info] "Local Control" as a PDI proposal qualification
|
||||
> The term "local control only" is sometimes used to indicate
|
||||
> no consideration for *any* lighting control beyond standard devices,
|
||||
> (with `$D`s being the triac type)
|
||||
> however, this phrasing is ambiguous and non-universal.
|
||||
> Confirm with the bid team on what must be included.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
|
||||
# Unit Takeoff
|
||||
|
||||
"Units" includes [hotel](#hotel) and [residential](#residential) spaces.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!tip] Preparing for Unit Takeoff
|
||||
Units generally have very little variation.
|
||||
I
|
||||
> Units generally have very little variation.
|
||||
> It is usually best to copy-paste takeoffs
|
||||
> rather than re-build them for each unit.
|
||||
|
||||
## Hotel
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10,6 +13,11 @@ I
|
||||
> * Guestrooms
|
||||
> * Keys
|
||||
|
||||
> [!trivia]
|
||||
> The origin of the term "key" as a synonym of "hotel room"
|
||||
> ...
|
||||
> %% TODO: %%
|
||||
|
||||
## Residential
|
||||
|
||||
> [!info] Also Known As
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -51,6 +51,19 @@ but do not apply them consistently in practice.
|
||||
> Chapter 7 describes a study where experts
|
||||
> were shown to estimate risk differently for identical cases.
|
||||
|
||||
### Luck Looks Like Skill
|
||||
|
||||
> Chapter 7 p.154
|
||||
|
||||
Hubbard describes a study which concluded that,
|
||||
given the number of German pilots and their overall victory/defeat figures,
|
||||
there was a ~30% chance an individual would achieve The Red Baron's record
|
||||
_by luck alone_.
|
||||
|
||||
He later refers to the tendency to overvalue competence
|
||||
in the role of achieving improbable accomplishments
|
||||
as the "Red Baron effect".
|
||||
|
||||
## Mentioned Topics and Abbreviations
|
||||
|
||||
* Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
|
||||
@@ -63,3 +76,29 @@ but do not apply them consistently in practice.
|
||||
* Loss-Exceedance Curve (LEC)
|
||||
* Risk Tolerance
|
||||
|
||||
## Critiques
|
||||
|
||||
### _Exsupero Ursus_
|
||||
|
||||
> Chapter 9 p.195
|
||||
|
||||
Hubbard uses _exsupero ursus_ to describe the tendency of his detractors
|
||||
to dismiss quantitative methods as inappropriate to their industry-specific risks.
|
||||
He provides another analogy in which one car is picked of two (ordinary) cars
|
||||
because the other car can't fly.
|
||||
Based on this strawman it is clear Hubbard believes his detractors are _correct_
|
||||
that qualitative methods can not capture the entire nuance of risk probability,
|
||||
but that they are failing to acknowledge that their preferred alternatives
|
||||
are not demonstrably more effective at doing so.
|
||||
The nuance Hubbard dismisses without addressing is the possibility of model _improvement_.
|
||||
A most competant detractor would be aware of the apparent contradiction
|
||||
but argue that their methods will eventually surpass quantitative methods
|
||||
if they are further developed.
|
||||
Such a position would additionally contextualize Hubbard's observations
|
||||
that detractors become emotional in their defense.
|
||||
To them, Hubbards methods represent an attractive short-term gain
|
||||
excluding a long-term payoff.
|
||||
|
||||
Hubbard's dismissal rubs me wrong
|
||||
because it reads exactly as he describes the "at least we're doing _something_" argument
|
||||
throughout the book and just pages earlier.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user