vault backup: 2026-02-25 13:08:42

This commit is contained in:
2026-02-25 13:08:42 -05:00
parent 75b84fda80
commit 802377a012
2 changed files with 0 additions and 0 deletions
+18
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
## 2025-11-13 ??:??:??
#occupational
### Questions for Bid Estimators
Questions for [[pdi-estimating#Bid Estimating|PDI Bid Estimators]].
#### Exclusions
When we send proposals with significant exclusions
(no lighting control, no demo, no submetering,
even when designed and shown on drawings):
Is there a conversation happening with our customers
before they receive our proposal?
Is it clear they understand what we're excluding?
+20
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
# 2026-01-12 13:02:??
#occupational
Joel attributes the [[#GP Variance|apparent variance]] to
1. missed Polaris lugs for feeders for one building,
2. insufficient budget for equipment rental, and
3. upfront costs already paid (construction is 50% complete).
He also said that operations accused ConEst
of providing insufficient length for subfeeds,
which he said was true,
but not to the extent accused
(only ~600ft missed total).
The award WBS shows $32,382 for equipment rental
I'm dubious of all these explanations,
but I don't have another one.
I can't find the ConEst folder or Accubid file.