vault backup: 2026-03-02 12:37:43

timestamped/2025-11-10_11-14-00.md

@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 ---
-id:
+id: 2025-11-10T11:14:00
 aliases: []
-title:
+title: 2025-11-10 11:14:??
 tags:
-  - type/timestamped
   - occupational/takeoff
   - original-format/digital-text
+  - type/timestamped
 dg-publish: true
 ---
 # 2025-11-10 11:14:??
@@ -28,10 +28,10 @@ when I noticed a strange paragraph:
 > > Types NM and NMC cables shall not be permitted as follows:
 > >
 > > 1. In any dwelling or structure not specifically
-> >   permitted in 334.10(1), (2), (3)
+> > permitted in 334.10(1), (2), (3)
 > > 
 > > 2. ==Exposed in dropped or suspended ceilings==
-> >   in other than one- and two-family and multifamily dwellings
+> > in other than one- and two-family and multifamily dwellings
 
 This analysis of 334.12(A)(2) is flawed.
 
@@ -54,4 +54,4 @@ It's unclear to me if this a genuine misunderstanding
 or just a [[heuristics|rule of thumb]] to cover the case
 that guestrooms are not interpreted to be dwelling units.
 If it's the latter, I believe it's far too conservative
-to be used whole-cloth on all estimates.
+to be used whole-cloth on all estimates.