vault backup: 2026-03-02 12:37:43
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: 2026-01-25T21:02:00-05:00
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
title: 2026-01-25 21:02:??
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- type/timestamped
|
||||
@@ -20,7 +21,7 @@ without acknowledging that _Fermi_ supplied the decomposition.
|
||||
Hubbard also references [[macgregor_1994_judgemental-decomposition]]
|
||||
which is a similar case.
|
||||
Neither of these examples suggest that decomposition is a magic bullet,
|
||||
or even that a layman's decomposition wouldn't be worse than nothing.
|
||||
_or even that a layman's decomposition wouldn't be worse than nothing._
|
||||
Despite this, Hubbard ends the section without qualifier:
|
||||
"Clearly, decomposition helps estimates."
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -28,4 +29,4 @@ This section comes only pages after
|
||||
[[hubbard_2020_failure#The Measurement Inversion]]
|
||||
in which Hubbard warns against seeking detail for the sake of it.
|
||||
|
||||
See also [[the-failure-of-risk-management#_Exsupero Ursus_]].
|
||||
See also [[the-failure-of-risk-management#_Exsupero Ursus_]].
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user