vault backup: 2026-03-02 12:37:43
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: 2026-02-27T13:58:30-05:00
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
title: "2026-02-27 13:58:30"
|
||||
title: 2026-02-27 13:58:30
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- authorship/original
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/timestamped
|
||||
dg-publish: true
|
||||
date-created: 2026-02-27T13:58:30-05:00
|
||||
daily: "[[2026-02-27]]"
|
||||
weekly: "[[2026-W09]]"
|
||||
date-created: 2026-02-27T13:58:30-05:00
|
||||
dg-publish: true
|
||||
monthly: "[[2026-02]]"
|
||||
quarterly: "[[2026-Q1]]"
|
||||
weekly: "[[2026-W09]]"
|
||||
yearly: "[[2026]]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
# 2026-02-27 13:58:30
|
||||
@@ -83,8 +83,9 @@ but Procurement has to check gear specs already,
|
||||
and ConEst doesn't have the experience necessary
|
||||
to make the redundancy cost-effective.
|
||||
|
||||
My 100% baseless speculation is that ConEst has recently been blamed
|
||||
for losses (very easy to do:
|
||||
My 100% baseless speculation
|
||||
is that ConEst has recently been blamed for losses
|
||||
(very easy to do:
|
||||
"ConEst was looking at these specs for two weeks
|
||||
and they didn't say anything")
|
||||
and rather than argue the point,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user