vault backup: 2026-03-02 12:37:43

timestamped/2026-02-27_19-00-57.md

@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@
 ---
 id: 2026-02-27T19:00:57-05:00
 aliases: []
-title: "2026-02-27 19:00:57"
+title: 2026-02-27 19:00:57
 tags:
   - authorship/original
   - destiny/permanent
   - status/draft
   - type/timestamped
-dg-publish: true
-date-created: 2026-02-27T19:00:57-05:00
 daily: "[[2026-02-27]]"
-weekly: "[[2026-W09]]"
+date-created: 2026-02-27T19:00:57-05:00
+dg-publish: true
 monthly: "[[2026-02]]"
 quarterly: "[[2026-Q1]]"
+weekly: "[[2026-W09]]"
 yearly: "[[2026]]"
 ---
 # 2026-02-27 19:00:57
@@ -24,9 +24,9 @@ yearly: "[[2026]]"
 > see the previous note [[2026-02-27_17-48-43]]
 > for a less formal discussion.
 
->[!quote] [[README#Attribution]]
+> [!quote] [[README#Attribution]]
 > ## Attribution
-> 
+>
 > Please do not credit my work
 > unless you are obligated to by formal standards.
 
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ This point is not controversial,
 it is understood that Warren Buffet's analysis of the stock market can be flawed
 even though he is a very successful trader.
 
-If despite this you
+If despite this you ...
 I am lead to two conclusions:
 
 1. you believe the author's person is relevant (you are foolish)
@@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ Damn it.
     however from a cursory reading it doesn't seem to be one
     Dewey would agree was especially relevant.
 
-
 This being the case, I'm lead to a secret third option:
 
 3. You believe the idea is relevant,