vault backup: 2026-04-15 22:32:11

2026-04-15 22:32:11 -04:00
parent 9769566d8d
commit 901925883d
8 changed files with 203 additions and 4 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+---
+id: 2026-04-15T19:28:06-04:00
+aliases: []
+title: 2026-04-15 19:28:06
+tags:
+  - authorship/original
+  - destiny/permanent
+  - status/draft
+  - type/periodic/timestamped
+daily: "[[2026-04-15]]"
+date-created: 2026-04-15T19:28:06-04:00
+dg-publish: true
+monthly: "[[2026-04]]"
+quarterly: "[[2026-Q2]]"
+weekly: "[[2026-W16]]"
+yearly: "[[2026]]"
+---
+# 2026-04-15 19:28:06
+
+## "Obsidian for Learning Part II: Process"
+
+["Obsidian for Learning Part II: Process" - No Boilerplate](https://youtu.be/Tyw6quANpiY)
+
+No Boilerplate first got me into [[obsidian]]
+so to see them endorse such strange patterns without qualification is frustrating.
+I suspect that Tris is a victim of [[drinking-ones-own-kool-aid]].
+
+***
+
+Clearly we have different priorities for our vaults,
+but I tend to think mine are more consistent.
+
+***
+
+I couldn't trade git version control
+for the convenience of Obsidian Sync on mobile.
+The timeline of my understanding
+is just as important as the result.
+
+***
+
+Tris has repeated ~~somewhere~~
+a piece of advice for Obsidian [[personal-knowledge-management]]
+that I think ought to be nonnegotiable.
+
+> You get one vault. Figure it out.
+
+***
+
+PKM, as I understand it, is in service of [[synthesis]],
+that if you have access to your knowledge
+without the effort and problems of recall,
+your processing power can be spent making connections.
+
+***
+
+The problem with titled notes
+is that titles are a barrier to writing
+that serve no purpose.
+
+> [!quote] [Steph Ango "Evergreen notes turn ideas into objects that you can manipulate"](https://stephango.com/evergreen-notes)
+> * A company is a superorganism
+> * All input is error
+> * Calmness is a superpower
+> * Concise explanations accelerate progress
+> * Cross the chasm
+> * Everything is a remix
+> * Writing is telepathy
+> * You have no obligation to your former self
+> * etc
+
+These are not summaries,
+this is quippy bullshit.
+If it seems like this would be a good way to organize ideas
+you are vastly underestimating the number of ideas you have.
+At scale you won't be able to distinguish between
+"Concise explanations accelerate progress"
+and "Accelerating progress explanations",
+and if titles-as-filenames doesn't aid organization
+you might as well use timestamps, which do.
+
+***
+
+Still I think the best way to start Obsidian
+is to install it with no expectations or introduction
+then write everything in unique notes with the core plugin.