vault backup: 2026-01-06 17:28:27

This commit is contained in:
2026-01-06 17:28:27 -05:00
parent d198d51c53
commit 97dd06e296
14 changed files with 987 additions and 125 deletions
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
---
id: mike-holts-illustrated-guide-to-electrical-estimating
aliases: []
title: "_Mike Holt's Illustrated Guide to Electrical Estimating_"
tags:
- authorship/original
- destiny/permanent
@@ -8,44 +9,62 @@ tags:
- topic/construction/electrical
- topic/estimating
- type/media-commentary
title: "_Mike Holt's Illustrated Guide to Electrical Estimating_"
---
# _Mike Holt's Illustrated Guide to Electrical Estimating_
```yaml
authors:
- Mike C. Holt
year: 2023
title: "Mike Holt's Illustrated Guide to Electrical Estimating"
publisher: Mike Holt Enterprises
type: book
pages: 234
```
Commentary on [[holt_2023_estimating]].
## Pros
## Goodreads Review
* Attractive design
* Detailed color illustrations
* Compelling topic organization and progression
_Mike Holt's Illustrated Guide to Electrical Estimating_,
like all of Holt's printed content I'm familiar with,
is a masterclass in construction education presentation
featuring attractive design, and plenty of detailed illustrations.
The bones of a great estimating textbook are present,
it has a compelling topic organization and progression,
however the content does not deliver on the promise.
## Cons
The text treats estimating like an invariable set of procedures:
(1) get the documents
(2) do the takeoff
(3) do the closeout
(4) send the bid;
**if** there's ambiguity in the documents,
**then** send an RFI.
* No mention of RFQ process
The reality of the industry is far messier than Holt would have you believe.
* Many/most topics are grossly oversimplified
What do you do when RFI's go unanswered?
Drop the job?
* Tone is undeservedly authoritative and principled,
refusing to acknowledge the questions of complexity
that the content itself begs
In fact, the text suggests that _all_ assumptions ==are bad==
> "Never make assumptions"
> What happens when RFI's go unanswered?
I was compelled by my employer to purchase this book
along with several others of Holt's
as part of my apprenticeship curriculum.
I can't shake the feeling that this entry
was intended to pad out the course to four years.
## Best Suited For
## Goodreads Review Scratch
* Electricians with no prior estimating experience and no real need of detail
Holt's tone is undeservedly authoritative and principled.
It refuses to acknowledge the questions of complexity
that the content itself begs.
"Never make assumptions"
Many topics are grossly oversimplified,
or omitted entirely (subcontractor RFQ process)
This book is far too large in scope to lack the detail it does.
It feels designed for those unlikely to need or understand its topics,
except it is far too long for a layman's introduction.
If there will ever be a book to be what this one could not,
I don't think Holt would be the one to write it.
The group's content is very "teach to the book"
which is exactly what you want for contractor exams,
but not practical for estimating methodology.
## Overall
This book is far too large in scope to lack the detail it does. The curriculum
is clearly designed for those unlikely to need or understand its topics