vault backup: 2025-12-18 17:14:55

transparency-in-construction-estimating.md

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+---
+id:
+aliases: []
+title: Transparency in Construction Estimating
+tags:
+  - authorship/original
+  - destiny/permanent
+  - status/not-started
+  - topic/construction
+  - topic/estimating
+  - topic/transparency
+  - type/cross-topic
+---
+# Transparency in Construction Estimating
+
+Cross-topic of [[transparency]] and [[construction-estimating]].
+
+## Estimating Ethics
+
+### Ethics for the Solicitor
+
+Contractors engaging in unethical bidding practices
+can quickly gain a reputation for doing so,
+leading to reduced bid response
+that can be impossible to fully recover from.
+
+To ensure a transparent bidding process, one must
+
+* divulge all selection criteria to bidders,
+* avoid conflicts of interest,
+* maintain confidentiality of bid submissions, and
+* provide equal access to bidding information.
+
+### Ethics for the Bidder
+
+Deceptive proposal language is a quick way to get blacklisted.
+
+Taking advantage of a customers ignorance of electrical construction
+is particularly reprehensible.
+
+> [!example]
+> * Not including consideration for voltage drop
+> * Including standard, line-voltage switching as "lighting control"
+> * Excluding all mechanical disconnects
+
+### Terms
+
+> [!info] Bid Shopping
+> the practice of sharing a bidder's quote with other prospective vendors
+> in order to solicit lower bids.
+> The competing quote may be legitimate, fabricated,
+> or a non-serious proposal from a colluding vendor.