vault backup: 2025-07-03 17:03:26
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,35 +1,35 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- estimating
|
||||
- software
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Software Based Estimating
|
||||
|
||||
## Software Based Estimating vs Estimating Software
|
||||
|
||||
This document describes the philosophy of software based estimating as a concept,
|
||||
independent of any specific example of [[construction-estimating-software]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Software Based Estimating vs Manual
|
||||
|
||||
Most estimating manuals treat "software based estimating" as an afterthought,
|
||||
when in practice there's no meaningful difference in practice from manual.
|
||||
|
||||
* Manual estimation is best done in terms of [[assemblies]] anyway.
|
||||
* On-screen takeoff just eliminates a single manual process.
|
||||
* Any estimator trained on Accubid could do the same by hand, the methodology is quite transparent.
|
||||
* At what point in Excel automation does manual estimation become software based?
|
||||
|
||||
There is no place for truly manual estimation (pencil and paper)
|
||||
with the availability of better options,
|
||||
even to teach the basics of the trade.
|
||||
|
||||
* Spreadsheet software is older than personal computers (LANPAR, 1969; VisiCalc, 1979)
|
||||
* Dedicated estimating software has been available longer than most estimators have been in the field. (McCormick, 1979?)
|
||||
|
||||
I don't generally accept that dedicated estimating software
|
||||
is strictly superior to spreadsheets (see [[estimating-philosophy]]),
|
||||
but it usually is for less technical estimators.
|
||||
|
||||
Manual estimation invites inaccuracy and inconsistency,
|
||||
and prohibits collaboration and flexibility.
|
||||
---
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- estimating
|
||||
- software
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Software Based Estimating
|
||||
|
||||
## Software Based Estimating vs Estimating Software
|
||||
|
||||
This document describes the philosophy of software based estimating as a concept,
|
||||
independent of any specific example of [[construction-estimating-software]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Software Based Estimating vs Manual
|
||||
|
||||
Most estimating manuals treat "software based estimating" as an afterthought,
|
||||
when in practice there's no meaningful difference in practice from manual.
|
||||
|
||||
* Manual estimation is best done in terms of [[assemblies]] anyway.
|
||||
* On-screen takeoff just eliminates a single manual process.
|
||||
* Any estimator trained on Accubid could do the same by hand, the methodology is quite transparent.
|
||||
* At what point in Excel automation does manual estimation become software based?
|
||||
|
||||
There is no place for truly manual estimation (pencil and paper)
|
||||
with the availability of better options,
|
||||
even to teach the basics of the trade.
|
||||
|
||||
* Spreadsheet software is older than personal computers (LANPAR, 1969; VisiCalc, 1979)
|
||||
* Dedicated estimating software has been available longer than most estimators have been in the field. (McCormick, 1979?)
|
||||
|
||||
I don't generally accept that dedicated estimating software
|
||||
is strictly superior to spreadsheets (see [[estimating-philosophy]]),
|
||||
but it usually is for less technical estimators.
|
||||
|
||||
Manual estimation invites inaccuracy and inconsistency,
|
||||
and prohibits collaboration and flexibility.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user