vault backup: 2026-01-02 15:28:02

This commit is contained in:
2026-01-02 15:28:02 -05:00
parent cfe8c4b88f
commit c6111e1fb6
22 changed files with 5786 additions and 95 deletions
+15 -15
View File
@@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ neither are readily applicable to building construction.
where "distance" is a measure of similarity
and physical geometry is rarely considered.
Of the two, pure math would be be preferred---being generally more rigorous---
Of the two, pure math would be be preferred---
being generally more rigorous---
but the first bin far outweighs the second.
See the difference in content from [geostatistics](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geostatistics)
to the conceivably far more broad [spatial statistics](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spatial_statistics).
@@ -51,22 +52,21 @@ New Note: [[ambiguity]]
A while ago I heard a minor coding influencer lament
that frameworks, packages, and tools
often have ridiculous sounding names
> `bubble-tea` and `ratatui`,
> libraries for creating CLI's, come to my mind
often have ridiculous sounding names[^2]
when, he suggests, they ought to just be called what they do.
Unfortunately some people and organizations agree,
giving us terms which mean both something very general
and something very specific.
[^2]: `bubble-tea` and `ratatui`
(libraries for creating CLI's) come to my mind
> [[project-management-tm|"Project Management"]]
> was my go to example, but weak
> because it's difficult for me to articulate
> the difference from construction project management
> especially to someone un familiar with the specifics of either.
Unfortunately some people and organizations agree with him,
giving us terms which mean both something very general
and something very specific.[^3]
[^3]: [[project-management-tm|"Project Management"]]
was my go to example, but weak
because it's difficult for me to articulate
the difference from construction project management
especially to someone unfamiliar with the specifics of either.
For lack of a better term I've been thinking of this as an SEO problem,
but the bigger problem is that it invites [[ambiguity#Category Mistake|Category Mistake]],
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ The two most dominant examples:
* [[lighting-controls#^dmx|"Digital Multiplex (DMX)"]]
while notably different in topology,
are could both be described accurately with the other's name.
could both be described accurately with the other's name.
> It is possible to avoid this problem
> without the effort necessary to come up with a clever name.