vault backup: 2026-01-02 15:28:02
This commit is contained in:
+15
-15
@@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ neither are readily applicable to building construction.
|
||||
where "distance" is a measure of similarity
|
||||
and physical geometry is rarely considered.
|
||||
|
||||
Of the two, pure math would be be preferred---being generally more rigorous---
|
||||
Of the two, pure math would be be preferred---
|
||||
being generally more rigorous---
|
||||
but the first bin far outweighs the second.
|
||||
See the difference in content from [geostatistics](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geostatistics)
|
||||
to the conceivably far more broad [spatial statistics](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spatial_statistics).
|
||||
@@ -51,22 +52,21 @@ New Note: [[ambiguity]]
|
||||
|
||||
A while ago I heard a minor coding influencer lament
|
||||
that frameworks, packages, and tools
|
||||
often have ridiculous sounding names
|
||||
|
||||
> `bubble-tea` and `ratatui`,
|
||||
> libraries for creating CLI's, come to my mind
|
||||
|
||||
often have ridiculous sounding names[^2]
|
||||
when, he suggests, they ought to just be called what they do.
|
||||
|
||||
Unfortunately some people and organizations agree,
|
||||
giving us terms which mean both something very general
|
||||
and something very specific.
|
||||
[^2]: `bubble-tea` and `ratatui`
|
||||
(libraries for creating CLI's) come to my mind
|
||||
|
||||
> [[project-management-tm|"Project Management"]]
|
||||
> was my go to example, but weak
|
||||
> because it's difficult for me to articulate
|
||||
> the difference from construction project management
|
||||
> especially to someone un familiar with the specifics of either.
|
||||
Unfortunately some people and organizations agree with him,
|
||||
giving us terms which mean both something very general
|
||||
and something very specific.[^3]
|
||||
|
||||
[^3]: [[project-management-tm|"Project Management"]]
|
||||
was my go to example, but weak
|
||||
because it's difficult for me to articulate
|
||||
the difference from construction project management
|
||||
especially to someone unfamiliar with the specifics of either.
|
||||
|
||||
For lack of a better term I've been thinking of this as an SEO problem,
|
||||
but the bigger problem is that it invites [[ambiguity#Category Mistake|Category Mistake]],
|
||||
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ The two most dominant examples:
|
||||
* [[lighting-controls#^dmx|"Digital Multiplex (DMX)"]]
|
||||
|
||||
while notably different in topology,
|
||||
are could both be described accurately with the other's name.
|
||||
could both be described accurately with the other's name.
|
||||
|
||||
> It is possible to avoid this problem
|
||||
> without the effort necessary to come up with a clever name.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user