vault backup: 2026-06-01 17:13:50

timestamped/2026-05-27_21-32-16.md

@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ and replaced with [[heating-designations]],
 I suggested leaving the existing work alone,
 citing that the limited information
 makes likely our superiors will have a different interpretation than us.
-**If we changed the takeoff then**
-**we would have to change it again.**
+**If we changed the takeoff now**
+**then we would have to change it again.**
 
 > Ultimately we did change the takeoff
 > because there were less than a dozen outlets in the project.
@@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ This is a good example of a scope question
 which I believe should be saved for review,
 not raised with the senior.
 
-1. The maximum project cost impact of the decision is low,
+1. The maximum project cost impact of the decision is low
+    (final cost is not especially [[sensitivity|sensitive]] to it),
     being only the difference between RG6 and Cat5e.
 
 2. The result of the decision will not affect our future takeoff.