vault backup: 2025-09-04 17:03:46
This commit is contained in:
@@ -95,6 +95,26 @@ The most idiomatic alternative to time-indexed takeoffs
|
||||
would be to represent them in the space of the drawings,
|
||||
then only extend them as necessary.
|
||||
|
||||
%%
|
||||
|
||||
### Scratch
|
||||
|
||||
Minimize takeoff flow disruption
|
||||
|
||||
Decouple takeoff (description of work) from assembly selection:
|
||||
|
||||
Match takeoff tags against assembly tags, select best
|
||||
|
||||
Expect uncertainty
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
length: 20-30ft
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Uniform distribution
|
||||
|
||||
%%
|
||||
|
||||
## Flaws of Traditional Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### Required Hyper-Specificity
|
||||
@@ -144,7 +164,8 @@ but that doesn't really justify it.
|
||||
The problem is that there's nothing linear about electrical installations,
|
||||
at best it's a directed acyclic graph.
|
||||
You can almost represent that linearly
|
||||
if you go down each branch to the end and then pick a new new line,
|
||||
if you go down each branch to the end
|
||||
and then pick a new new line,
|
||||
but that's unideal.
|
||||
|
||||
### Assumed Finality
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user