vault backup: 2026-04-29 22:09:02
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: 2026-04-29T20:25:22-0400
|
||||
title: 2026-04-29 20:25:22
|
||||
tags: []
|
||||
daily: "[[2026-04-29]]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
# 2026-04-29 20:25:22
|
||||
|
||||
## Heterodox Construction Estimating
|
||||
|
||||
As a lifelong pedant, hater, contrarian, etc.
|
||||
when I first heard of [[heterodoxy]]
|
||||
as applied to highly-opinionated professional disciplines
|
||||
I thought immediately of my own highly-opinionated discipline
|
||||
in [[construction-estimating]].
|
||||
|
||||
The existence of a heterodoxy requires that of an orthodoxy,
|
||||
and I believe [[holt_2023_estimating]] is typical of it.
|
||||
Construction estimating is simply finding the optimal price for a service,
|
||||
a process necessary of all service industries,
|
||||
frequently stated to be more art than science.
|
||||
Orthodox estimators may parrot the same refrain,
|
||||
but their own process is neither art nor science.
|
||||
It's much more like doing taxes:
|
||||
prolonged, tedious, opaque, over-complicated,
|
||||
and ultimately resulting in a value that no one is satisfied with,
|
||||
but that they have no basis to question.
|
||||
|
||||
Also like taxes,
|
||||
orthodox estimating methods are assumed obligatory,
|
||||
but you can actually do whatever you want.
|
||||
It's a free country, man.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user