vault backup: 2025-08-14 17:02:10

.obsidian/plugins/recent-files-obsidian/data.json

@@ -1,5 +1,13 @@
 {
   "recentFiles": [
+    {
+      "basename": "feeder-sizing",
+      "path": "feeder-sizing.md"
+    },
+    {
+      "basename": "README",
+      "path": "README.md"
+    },
     {
       "basename": "feeders",
       "path": "feeders.md"
@@ -8,10 +16,6 @@
       "basename": "psn-distribution-list",
       "path": "psn-distribution-list.md"
     },
-    {
-      "basename": "README",
-      "path": "README.md"
-    },
     {
       "basename": "estimator-skills",
       "path": "estimator-skills.md"
@@ -195,10 +199,6 @@
     {
       "basename": "telecom",
       "path": "telecom.md"
-    },
-    {
-      "basename": "software-based-estimating",
-      "path": "software-based-estimating.md"
     }
   ],
   "omittedPaths": [],

feeder-sizing.md

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+---
+id:
+aliases: []
+tags:
+  - status/fleeting
+---
+# Feeder Sizing
+
+> [!cite] 250.122 Size of Equipment Grounding Conductors
+> **(A) General.** Copper, aluminum, or copper-clad aluminum
+> equipment grounding conductors of the wire type
+> shall not be smaller than shown in Table 250.122,
+> but in no case shall they be required to be larger
+> than the circuit conductors supplying the equipment...
+
+Apparently in the 2026 NEC First Draft Meetings,
+Code Making Panel 5 clarified that the equipment grounding conductor (EGC)
+never needs to be larger than the largest ungrounded conductor in any raceway
+when installed in parallel.
+I can not find a source to verify this.