vault backup: 2026-04-18 19:02:34
This commit is contained in:
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ title: 2025-07-18 ??:??:??
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- topic/construction
|
||||
- topic/estimating
|
||||
- type/anecdote
|
||||
dg-publish: true
|
||||
daily: "[[2025-07-18]]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: 2026-04-18_00-37-27
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
title: 2026-04-18_00-37-27
|
||||
tags: []
|
||||
dg-publish: true
|
||||
daily: "[[2026-04-18]]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
# 2026-04-18_00-37-27
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: 2026-04-18_15-40-55
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
title: 2026-04-18_15-40-55
|
||||
tags: []
|
||||
dg-publish: true
|
||||
daily: "[[2026-04-18]]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
# 2026-04-18_15-40-55
|
||||
|
||||
Follow-up to [[2026-04-15_19-28-06#"Obsidian for Learning Part II: Process"]]:
|
||||
|
||||
While I have nothing else positive to say about the video,
|
||||
I do like, and have implemented, the `up` property.
|
||||
|
||||
Recently I've been less certain that [[tags]] serve a useful function.
|
||||
`up` appeals to me because it is intuitive but versatile.
|
||||
I'm using it now for implementations of templates
|
||||
like [[recipes]] and [[conest-projects]].
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: 2026-04-18_18-44-11
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
title: 2026-04-18_18-44-11
|
||||
tags: []
|
||||
dg-publish: true
|
||||
daily: "[[2026-04-18]]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
# 2026-04-18_18-44-11
|
||||
|
||||
I don't see many anymore
|
||||
on account of my change in workplace,
|
||||
but I think often of [[construction-estimating|estimators]]
|
||||
like I once knew well,
|
||||
who somehow managed to be in the industry for decades
|
||||
while believing that it is poor estimating
|
||||
to accept any risk in a bid,
|
||||
that all uncertainty must be clarified.
|
||||
|
||||
Of course,
|
||||
they didn't believe that with their actions,
|
||||
only their words.
|
||||
Suppose though we take them at those words,
|
||||
like you do when you're a new estimator
|
||||
who barely knows what the word means,
|
||||
you're just happy to be out of the field
|
||||
where it's hot and no one is ever happy.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user