Files
zmVault/leslie-et-al_1968_gregg-notehand.md
T

5.0 KiB

id, aliases, title, tags, authors, edition, publisher, subtitle, type, year, dg-publish
id aliases title tags authors edition publisher subtitle type year dg-publish
gregg notehand
Gregg Notehand
authorship/other
destiny/permanent
exclude-from-word-count
status/incomplete
type/media/book
Deese, James
Leslie, Louis A.
Poe, Roy W.
Zoubek, Charles E.
Second McGraw-Hill, Inc. A Personal-Use Shorthand & Integrated Instruction in How to Make Notes book 1968 false

Gregg Notehand

Part One

1. Fundamental principles of notemaking

2-8. Notehand principles

9. Getting ready to study

10. Planning your study time

11. Select the right notebook for notemaking

12. Notemaking from reading

13. Rules for remembering what you read

14. Notehand recall

15. Finding the central idea in your reading

16. Finding the central idea in your reading (continued)

18. Using the central idea to build your headings

19. Read before you make notes

20. Notehand recall

21. Making notes in your own words

22. Brevity in making notes in your own words

23. Organizing notes in narrative summaries

24. Organizing notes in outline form

25. Leave wide margins

26. Notehand recall

27. Use longhand headings in your notes

28. Use signals for "must remember" items

29. Making verbatim notes

30. The notemaker is an active listener

31. Getting the most out of your listening

32. Writing names in your notes

33. Notehand recall

34. Rules for effective listening

35. Rules for effective listening (continued)

36. Preserve difficult longhand spellings

37. Showing contrasts and comparisons in your notes

38. Definitions, background information, and examples

39. Notehand recall

40. Using notehand in original writing

41. Making rough drafts

42. Footnotes

43. Special uses of notehand in original writing

44. How to make notes for research papers

45. Getting ready to make notes from research

46. Making notes from research

47. Writing the research paper

48. Notehand recall

Part Two

49. Reviewing and preparing for examinations

50. Making derived notes

51. Making notes of class discussions

52. Making notes of other meetings and discussions

53. Making notes as a recorder

54. Writing the minutes

55. Indexing your notes

56. Disposition of your notes

57-70. Notehand principles

Key to Gregg Notehand

Index to Gregg Notehand

Gregg Notehand

Gregg Notehand is a simplified form of Gregg Shorthand. It is described in the namesake leslie-et-al_1968_gregg-notehand

Critiques

The lessons use sounds-like-(letter)-in-(word) type phoneme definitions, and generally suffer from a facile understanding of phonology. Totally unacceptable for a proposed alternative alphabet, but then the text does not understand that's what it's proposing.

leslie-et-al_1968_gregg-notehand#2-8. Notehand principles Silent letters omitted. In the English language many words contain letters that are not pronounced. In Notehand these silent letters are omitted, and only those sounds in a word are written that are actually pronounced. For example, in the word say, the y would not be written because it is not pronounced; say would be written s-a. The word face would be written f-a-s; the final e would be omitted because it is not pronounced, and the c would be represented by the s stroke because it is pronounced s.

What letters in the following words would not be written in Notehand because they are not pronounced?

  • day
  • eat
  • main
  • mean
  • save
  • steam

leslie-et-al_1968_gregg-notehand#2-8. Notehand principles Gregg Notehand is easy to learn---easier, actually, than longhand. Why? In longhand, there are many different ways of writing a given letter; in Gregg Notehand, there is only one way.

This is a baffling first paragraph. Without further clarification, the text seems to be implying that students learning longhand are expected to learn to read and write many forms of the same letter, where reality is the opposite.

In fact, it is plain to see from the lessons in the text that Gregg Notehand had far more individual character variation than is accepted of the English alphabet.

The text does not specify winding direction for circular forms (e.g. "a" and "e"), nor is the illustrator consistent between words. For many words, neither option is more intuitive, and the choice radically changes its form.

More damningly, in Lesson 26 we learn the "s" stroke is allowed to be written backwards.

It's a very strange choice, claiming that a shorthand is less ambiguous than the writing system it replaces. I'm sure its possible, but English doesn't have enough frills to cut off. Shorthand trades certainty for speed, that's the whole point.


Some words, especially those more than one syllable, I believe are illustrated incorrectly based on preceding text and examples. "Navy" is particularly egregious.