vault backup: 2026-05-06 17:00:04
This commit is contained in:
+1
-5
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"index": 0,
|
||||
"name": "Progress Checklist",
|
||||
"tmp_name": "Command 0",
|
||||
"tmp_name": "Progress Checklist",
|
||||
"bindings": [
|
||||
0
|
||||
],
|
||||
@@ -32,9 +32,5 @@
|
||||
],
|
||||
"states_dict": {}
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"registedCmdName": [
|
||||
"Progress Checklist-Next",
|
||||
"Progress Checklist-Prev"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
aliases:
|
||||
- Ben
|
||||
title: Benjamin "Ben" O'Brien
|
||||
tags: []
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Benjamin "Ben" O'Brien
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: Cincinnati Convention Center Hotel
|
||||
tags: []
|
||||
up: "[[conest-projects]]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Cincinnati Convention Center Hotel
|
||||
|
||||
## TODO
|
||||
|
||||
* [ ] Feeders
|
||||
* [ ] 3NT3, 3NL3 (split from 3NTL3 in previous revision) moved over 100ft
|
||||
Feeds to company switches (and possibly others) will need to be remeasured.
|
||||
+6
-1
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
aliases:
|
||||
- rule-of-thumb
|
||||
title: Heuristics
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- type/encyclopedia
|
||||
title: Heuristics
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Heuristics
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -56,3 +56,8 @@ is to _forecast as accurately as possible_.
|
||||
|
||||
Realism is noble, granted,
|
||||
but instrumentalism is far more practical.
|
||||
|
||||
## See Also
|
||||
|
||||
* [Map--territory relation - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Map%E2%80%93territory_relation)
|
||||
* "Mistaking the map for the territory" (logical fallacy)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: 2026-05-06T14:00:10-0400
|
||||
title: 2026-05-06 14:00:10
|
||||
tags: []
|
||||
daily: "[[2026-05-06]]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
# 2026-05-06 14:00:10
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant to [[feeders-takeoff]]
|
||||
for [[cincinnati-convention-center-hotel]].
|
||||
|
||||
> [!quote] [[zane-meyers|Me]] 2026-05-06 13:36 via Microsoft Teams
|
||||
> Hey Joel, \[previous estimator\]'s feeder takeoff used aluminum grounds
|
||||
> instead of copper like the schedule wanted in the GMP set
|
||||
> and still does in this one.
|
||||
> Are we assuming that's fine from the proposal
|
||||
> "Aluminum 100A and above | Per Schedule & Spec"?
|
||||
|
||||
> [[joel-jansen|Joel]] 2026-05-06 13:41 via Microsoft Teams
|
||||
> Yea, if we are allowed to use Aluminum,
|
||||
> we should be good to use aluminum grounds as well
|
||||
|
||||
[[benjamin-obrien|Ben]] confirmed.
|
||||
@@ -19,9 +19,18 @@ It's my intent that if a rule holds in _all_ cases,
|
||||
even the super special one you're thinking I didn't consider,
|
||||
that I specifically say so.
|
||||
If I didn't say so, and your edge case is not covered,
|
||||
you should seek clarification.
|
||||
**you should seek clarification.**
|
||||
%%
|
||||
|
||||
## Wire Material Selection
|
||||
|
||||
[[pdi-estimating]] preference is to use aluminum conductors
|
||||
|
||||
If [[pdi-bid-estimating|Bid]]'s proposal sells aluminum 100A and larger
|
||||
use aluminum for grounds, even if the feeder schedule uses copper.[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
[^1]: [[2026-05-06_14-00-10]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Wiring Method Selection
|
||||
|
||||
Below is an example Wiring Method Selection
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user