vault backup: 2026-05-27 11:12:04
This commit is contained in:
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ construction estimating as a profession
|
||||
suffers from poor conditions for natural improvement of [[estimator-calibration]],
|
||||
namely delayed and uninformative feedback.
|
||||
As a consequence,
|
||||
decisions are made on [[gut-feel]] at best,
|
||||
decisions are made on [[intuition]] at best,
|
||||
and superstition at worst.
|
||||
The suitability of estimating methods
|
||||
is judged based on [value](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Value_(ethics))[^2]
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ and when they are simply bad luck.
|
||||
|
||||
The last case is where I'd bet the perceived value of ConEst is found.[^4]
|
||||
I can't help but feel that this effort is misplaced.
|
||||
If project management is like estimating,
|
||||
If [[pdi-operations|ops]] is like [[pdi-estimating|estimating]],
|
||||
I have no doubt that they could _all_ benefit from training.
|
||||
Identifying who exactly needs it more, then, is pointless.
|
||||
As well to identify which cases of great project success
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user