vault backup: 2025-10-10 14:37:17
This commit is contained in:
+2
-2
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
||||
.obsidian/workspace.json
|
||||
.obsidian/plugins/recent-files-obsidian/data.json
|
||||
/.obsidian/plugins/recent-files-obsidian/data.json
|
||||
.obsidian/mobile-workspace.json
|
||||
.obsidian/plugins/recent-files-obsidian/data.json
|
||||
Vendored
+7
-28
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"collapse-filter": false,
|
||||
"search": "-tag:#type/media -tag:#type/media-commentary",
|
||||
"search": "",
|
||||
"showTags": false,
|
||||
"showAttachments": false,
|
||||
"hideUnresolved": true,
|
||||
@@ -8,31 +8,10 @@
|
||||
"collapse-color-groups": false,
|
||||
"colorGroups": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"query": "tag:#topic/meta",
|
||||
"query": "tag:#topic/estimating ",
|
||||
"color": {
|
||||
"a": 1,
|
||||
"rgb": 14725458
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"query": "tag:#occupational",
|
||||
"color": {
|
||||
"a": 1,
|
||||
"rgb": 11657298
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"query": "tag:#software",
|
||||
"color": {
|
||||
"a": 1,
|
||||
"rgb": 6443744
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"query": "tag:#systems",
|
||||
"color": {
|
||||
"a": 1,
|
||||
"rgb": 14701138
|
||||
"rgb": 5431473
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
@@ -41,11 +20,11 @@
|
||||
"textFadeMultiplier": 0,
|
||||
"nodeSizeMultiplier": 1,
|
||||
"lineSizeMultiplier": 1,
|
||||
"collapse-forces": true,
|
||||
"centerStrength": 0.518713248970312,
|
||||
"collapse-forces": false,
|
||||
"centerStrength": 0.578125,
|
||||
"repelStrength": 10,
|
||||
"linkStrength": 1,
|
||||
"linkDistance": 250,
|
||||
"scale": 0.423737361049094,
|
||||
"linkDistance": 231,
|
||||
"scale": 0.42373736104909204,
|
||||
"close": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
+1
-1
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
|
||||
"library2": {
|
||||
"type": "excalidrawlib",
|
||||
"version": 2,
|
||||
"source": "https://github.com/zsviczian/obsidian-excalidraw-plugin/releases/tag/2.14.1",
|
||||
"source": "https://github.com/zsviczian/obsidian-excalidraw-plugin/releases/tag/2.16.1",
|
||||
"libraryItems": []
|
||||
},
|
||||
"imageElementNotice": true,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"defaultMode": "match",
|
||||
"autoPin": "onMove",
|
||||
"triggerDelay": 300,
|
||||
"closeDelay": 600,
|
||||
"autoFocus": true,
|
||||
"rollDown": false,
|
||||
"snapToEdges": false,
|
||||
"initialHeight": "340px",
|
||||
"initialWidth": "400px",
|
||||
"showViewHeader": false,
|
||||
"imageZoom": true,
|
||||
"hoverEmbeds": false,
|
||||
"footnotes": "never",
|
||||
"headings": "always",
|
||||
"blocks": "never"
|
||||
}
|
||||
+146
-142
@@ -5,184 +5,76 @@
|
||||
"path": "README.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "stochastic-branch-takeoff",
|
||||
"path": "stochastic-branch-takeoff.md"
|
||||
"basename": "estimating-culture",
|
||||
"path": "estimating-culture.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "spatial-sampling",
|
||||
"path": "spatial-sampling.gif"
|
||||
"basename": "risk-oriented-estimating",
|
||||
"path": "risk-oriented-estimating.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "monte-carlo-methods",
|
||||
"path": "monte-carlo-methods.md"
|
||||
"basename": "optimal-estimating-patterns",
|
||||
"path": "optimal-estimating-patterns.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "2025-07-18_estimating-isnt-engineering",
|
||||
"path": "2025-07-18_estimating-isnt-engineering.md"
|
||||
"basename": "consolidate-estimating-thoughts",
|
||||
"path": "consolidate-estimating-thoughts.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "assembly-objects",
|
||||
"path": "assembly-objects.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "assembly-philosophy",
|
||||
"path": "assembly-philosophy.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "automating-estimating-project-creation",
|
||||
"path": "automating-estimating-project-creation.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "automating-pdf-annotation",
|
||||
"path": "automating-pdf-annotation.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "birds",
|
||||
"path": "birds.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "company-switch",
|
||||
"path": "company-switch.png"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "hvac-calculations",
|
||||
"path": "hvac-calculations.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "windows-setup",
|
||||
"path": "windows-setup.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "fixture-designations",
|
||||
"path": "fixture-designations.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "fixtures",
|
||||
"path": "fixtures.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "full-takeoff",
|
||||
"path": "full-takeoff.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "alternating-current",
|
||||
"path": "alternating-current.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "material-pricing",
|
||||
"path": "material-pricing.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "separation-of-concerns",
|
||||
"path": "separation-of-concerns.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "design-build-budget",
|
||||
"path": "design-build-budget.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "construction-estimating-using-excel",
|
||||
"path": "construction-estimating-using-excel.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "construction-estimating-software",
|
||||
"path": "construction-estimating-software.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "me",
|
||||
"path": "me.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "getting-historical-pricing",
|
||||
"path": "getting-historical-pricing.md"
|
||||
"basename": "separating-estimating-concerns",
|
||||
"path": "separating-estimating-concerns.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "functional-estimating",
|
||||
"path": "functional-estimating.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "fire-alarm",
|
||||
"path": "fire-alarm.md"
|
||||
"basename": "pdi-estimating-systems",
|
||||
"path": "pdi-estimating-systems.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "sleeving",
|
||||
"path": "sleeving.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "alternating-current",
|
||||
"path": "alternating-current.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "feeders",
|
||||
"path": "feeders.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "feeder-verification",
|
||||
"path": "feeder-verification.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "excel-macros",
|
||||
"path": "excel-macros.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "estimating-as-code",
|
||||
"path": "estimating-as-code.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "breakdown-objects",
|
||||
"path": "breakdown-objects.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "bpm-award-analysis",
|
||||
"path": "bpm-award-analysis.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "90-day-performance-review",
|
||||
"path": "90-day-performance-review.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "ai-in-estimating",
|
||||
"path": "ai-in-estimating.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "gut-feel",
|
||||
"path": "gut-feel.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "uncertainty",
|
||||
"path": "uncertainty.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "traditional-estimating-methods",
|
||||
"path": "traditional-estimating-methods.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "this-notebook",
|
||||
"path": "this-notebook.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "favorite-quotes",
|
||||
"path": "favorite-quotes.md"
|
||||
"basename": "full-takeoff",
|
||||
"path": "full-takeoff.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "strategy",
|
||||
"path": "strategy.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "area-of-refuge",
|
||||
"path": "area-of-refuge.md"
|
||||
"basename": "estimating-detail",
|
||||
"path": "estimating-detail.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "conductor-sizing",
|
||||
"path": "conductor-sizing.md"
|
||||
"basename": "estimating-methodologies",
|
||||
"path": "estimating-methodologies.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "gold-plating",
|
||||
"path": "gold-plating.md"
|
||||
"basename": "bid-process-strategy",
|
||||
"path": "bid-process-strategy.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "accubid-setup",
|
||||
"path": "accubid-setup.md"
|
||||
"basename": "TODO",
|
||||
"path": "TODO.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "electrical",
|
||||
"path": "electrical.md"
|
||||
"basename": "topics",
|
||||
"path": "topics.base"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "nfpa-70_314_boxes",
|
||||
"path": "nfpa-70_314_boxes.md"
|
||||
"basename": "monte-carlo-methods",
|
||||
"path": "monte-carlo-methods.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "nfpa-70_450_transformers",
|
||||
@@ -192,9 +84,121 @@
|
||||
"basename": "nfpa-70_430_motors",
|
||||
"path": "nfpa-70_430_motors.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "nfpa-70_314_boxes",
|
||||
"path": "nfpa-70_314_boxes.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "nfpa-70_310_conductors_for_general_wiring",
|
||||
"path": "nfpa-70_310_conductors_for_general_wiring.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "nfpa-70_220_load-calculations",
|
||||
"path": "nfpa-70_220_load-calculations.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "nfpa-70_215_feeders",
|
||||
"path": "nfpa-70_215_feeders.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "nfpa-70_210_branch-circuits",
|
||||
"path": "nfpa-70_210_branch-circuits.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "nfpa-70_110_requirements-for-electrical-installations",
|
||||
"path": "nfpa-70_110_requirements-for-electrical-installations.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "realism-vs-instrumentalism",
|
||||
"path": "realism-vs-instrumentalism.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "pdi-estimating",
|
||||
"path": "pdi-estimating.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "estimating-thoughts",
|
||||
"path": "estimating-thoughts.base"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "tasks",
|
||||
"path": "tasks.base"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "subfeeds",
|
||||
"path": "subfeeds.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "supertopics",
|
||||
"path": "supertopics.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "this-notebook",
|
||||
"path": "this-notebook.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "traditional-estimating-methods",
|
||||
"path": "traditional-estimating-methods.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "units",
|
||||
"path": "units.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "uncertainty",
|
||||
"path": "uncertainty.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "windows-setup",
|
||||
"path": "windows-setup.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "backlog",
|
||||
"path": "backlog.base"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "location-vs-scope",
|
||||
"path": "Excalidraw/location-vs-scope.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "raceway-terms",
|
||||
"path": "raceway-terms.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "hvac-calculations",
|
||||
"path": "hvac-calculations.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "owned-models",
|
||||
"path": "owned-models.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "gold-plating",
|
||||
"path": "gold-plating.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "the-failure-of-risk-management",
|
||||
"path": "the-failure-of-risk-management.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "portable-tools",
|
||||
"path": "portable-tools.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "pre-takeoff-confirmation",
|
||||
"path": "pre-takeoff-confirmation.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "risk",
|
||||
"path": "risk.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "project-setup",
|
||||
"path": "project-setup.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"basename": "standalone-systems",
|
||||
"path": "standalone-systems.md"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"omittedPaths": [],
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -34,3 +34,4 @@ All notes are located in the main directory.
|
||||
|
||||
For steps to clone this vault
|
||||
and setup Git, see [[windows-setup]].
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: TODO
|
||||
aliases:
|
||||
- todo
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/meta
|
||||
- type/encyclopedia
|
||||
title: TODO
|
||||
---
|
||||
# TODO
|
||||
|
||||
This page is for tasks related to the organization
|
||||
of the contents of [[this-notebook]].
|
||||
|
||||
## Long-Running Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
These tasks are will never be complete,
|
||||
so long as the notebook is in use.
|
||||
|
||||
### Assign Note Destiny
|
||||
|
||||
![[backlog.base#notes-without-destiny]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Assign Note Status
|
||||
|
||||
![[backlog.base#notes-without-status]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Cull Fleeting Notes
|
||||
|
||||
Handle and delete [[tags#destiny/fleeting]] notes.
|
||||
|
||||
![[backlog.base#fleeting-notes]]
|
||||
|
||||
## One-Time Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
![[tasks.base#meta]]
|
||||
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- occupational/systems
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Blank System
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- occupational
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Accubid Setup
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ aliases:
|
||||
- area-of-rescue
|
||||
- two-way-communication
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- occupational/systems/standalone-systems
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Area of Refuge (AoR)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
|
||||
filters:
|
||||
and:
|
||||
- file.folder == "/"
|
||||
- file.ext == "md"
|
||||
views:
|
||||
- type: table
|
||||
name: notes-without-destiny
|
||||
filters:
|
||||
and:
|
||||
- '!file.hasTag("destiny")'
|
||||
- type: table
|
||||
name: fleeting-notes
|
||||
filters:
|
||||
and:
|
||||
- file.hasTag("destiny/fleeting")
|
||||
- file.name != "tags"
|
||||
- type: table
|
||||
name: notes-without-status
|
||||
filters:
|
||||
and:
|
||||
- '!file.hasTag("status")'
|
||||
- file.ext == "md"
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: risk-oriented-estimating
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/estimating
|
||||
- topic/risk
|
||||
- type/philosophy
|
||||
title: Bid Process Strategy
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Bid Process Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
This note is intended to describe
|
||||
|
||||
[[strategy#Auction Theory]]
|
||||
|
||||
**Executives** inform **Risk Tolerance**,
|
||||
**Risk Tolerance** informs **Minimum Estimate Certainty**
|
||||
|
||||
### Bid Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
Project cost certainty
|
||||
|
||||
#### Expected Competition
|
||||
|
||||
### Estimation Strategy
|
||||
-110
@@ -1,110 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- authorship/other
|
||||
- occupational
|
||||
title: Breakdowns
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Breakdowns
|
||||
|
||||
| category | category1 | room-type | room-type1 |
|
||||
| -------------- | ---------------------- | ----------------------------------- | -------------------------- |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Units | | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Keys | | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Balconies | | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Terrace | | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Corridors | | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Garage | | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Exterior Elevated Deck | | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Office | Commercial Business (Tenant) | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Retail | Art Room (Core & Shell) | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Retail | Commercial Mercantile | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Retail | Commercial Restaurant | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | BOH | Bike Rack | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | BOH | Corridors / Circulation | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | BOH | Data / IT Room | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | BOH | Electrical Room | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | BOH | Elevators | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | BOH | Fire Pump Room | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | BOH | Generator Room | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | BOH | Housekeeping / Janitor Closet | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | BOH | Kitchen Equipment | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | BOH | Laundry Room | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | BOH | Maintenance / Equipment Room | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | BOH | MDF / IDF Room | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | BOH | Mechanical Room | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | BOH | Package Room | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | BOH | Pool Equipment | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | BOH | Restroom | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | BOH | Service Room | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | BOH | Security Room | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | BOH | Stairs | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | BOH | Storage Room | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | BOH | Trash Room / Dumspter Room | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Admin. Offices | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Bar / Cafe | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Club Room | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Clubhouse | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Dining Room | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Employee Lounge / Break Room | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Kitchen Area | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Leasing Office | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Mail Room | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Non-Typical Stairs | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Pet Spa | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Sales Office | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Vestibule | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Gym / Fitness | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Gym / Fitness | Exercise Room |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Gym / Fitness | Health Club |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Gym / Fitness | Indoor Pool / Spa |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Gym / Fitness | Indoor Sports Court |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Gym / Fitness | Locker Rooms |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Gym / Fitness | Restroom (Gym/Spa Only) |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Gym / Fitness | Spa / Massage Rooms |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Main Lobby | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Main Lobby | Concierge |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Main Lobby | Entry Common Area |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Main Lobby | Front Desk |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Main Lobby | Lobby |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Main Lobby | Lounge |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Multipurpose / Activity Rooms | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Multipurpose / Activity Rooms | Arcade / Game Room |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Multipurpose / Activity Rooms | Assembly |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Multipurpose / Activity Rooms | Ballroom / Reception |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Multipurpose / Activity Rooms | Billiards |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Multipurpose / Activity Rooms | Business / Computer Center |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Multipurpose / Activity Rooms | Card Room |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Multipurpose / Activity Rooms | Gallery Room |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Multipurpose / Activity Rooms | Kid's Room |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Multipurpose / Activity Rooms | Library / Study |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Multipurpose / Activity Rooms | Meeting / Conference Room |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Multipurpose / Activity Rooms | Party / Entertainment Room |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Multipurpose / Activity Rooms | Salon |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Multipurpose / Activity Rooms | Solarium |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Multipurpose / Activity Rooms | Theater |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Assisted Living | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Assisted Living | Exam Room |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Interior Amenity | Assisted Living | Nursing |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Exterior Amenity | Assisted Living | Skilled Care |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Exterior Amenity | Cabanas (when not counted as units) | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Exterior Amenity | Courtyard | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Exterior Amenity | Dog Park / Run | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Exterior Amenity | Fitness - Exterior | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Exterior Amenity | Greenhouse / Garden Room | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Exterior Amenity | Multipurpose Lawn | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Exterior Amenity | Outdoor Terrace | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Exterior Amenity | Pool Deck | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Exterior Amenity | Roof Deck | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Exterior Amenity | Rooftop Bar / Lounge - Exterior | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Exterior Amenity | Sport Court | |
|
||||
| SF Total - GSF | Exterior Amenity | Swimming Pool / Spa | |
|
||||
| SF Units - NSF | | A/C Space (Net Rentable) | |
|
||||
| Exclusions | | Utility Room | |
|
||||
| Exclusions | | Garden Style Courtyard / Breezeways | |
|
||||
| Exclusions | | Garden Style Pool / Spa Deck | |
|
||||
| Exclusions | | Gazebo | |
|
||||
| Exclusions | | Mechanical Roof Level | |
|
||||
| Exclusions | | Pavillion | |
|
||||
| Exclusions | | Surface Lot Parking | |
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/fleeting
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/estimating
|
||||
- topic/meta
|
||||
- type/task
|
||||
title: Consolidate Estimating Thoughts
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Consolidate Estimating Thoughts
|
||||
|
||||
My notes on construction estimating
|
||||
are currently disparate, disjointed, and redundant
|
||||
|
||||
## Relevant Notes
|
||||
|
||||
![[estimating-thoughts.base]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Orphaned Topics
|
||||
|
||||
### Naming Conventions (Use Case vs. Description)
|
||||
|
||||
Naming by use case is intuitive for those without estimating or field experience,
|
||||
but has the side effect that those accustomed to the names
|
||||
will inevitably _treat them as descriptive_.
|
||||
|
||||
| Use Case | Description |
|
||||
| ------------------- | ------------- |
|
||||
| Hi-Hat | Daisy-Chain |
|
||||
| Furnished By Others | Rough-In Only |
|
||||
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/uncertain
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/estimating
|
||||
- topic/software
|
||||
- type/philosophy
|
||||
@@ -77,5 +79,5 @@ Suppose a minimal
|
||||
## Innovative Concepts
|
||||
|
||||
* [[estimating-as-code]]
|
||||
* [[estimating-ergonomics]]
|
||||
* [[optimal-estimating-patterns]]
|
||||
* [[estimating-dimensionality]]
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,61 +4,18 @@ aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- topic/estimating
|
||||
- type/philosophy
|
||||
- type/encyclopedia
|
||||
title: Construction Estimating
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Construction Estimating
|
||||
|
||||
> [!note]
|
||||
> This note is intended for: _facts_
|
||||
> that are _about the profession_,
|
||||
> specifically, _as it is currently practiced_.
|
||||
|
||||
Construction estimating is a subset of cost estimation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
The purpose of [[construction-estimating]] in practice
|
||||
is not to determine the cost of the scope,
|
||||
which would take far longer than allotted for bid,
|
||||
|
||||
### For the Solicitor
|
||||
|
||||
* Determine feasibility of functional requirements
|
||||
|
||||
> [!info] Type 2 Owners
|
||||
> For some owners, money is no object,
|
||||
> and standardization is far more important
|
||||
> than any potential construction savings.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> These owners can be expected to decline every [[value-engineering]] option offered
|
||||
> (see [[gold-plating]]).
|
||||
|
||||
### For the Contractor
|
||||
|
||||
* Make profit to meet growth target
|
||||
* Secure work for current and projected employees (fill backlog)
|
||||
|
||||
%% TODO: "Determine the sale price of a service" %%
|
||||
|
||||
> [!aside]
|
||||
> I take increasing issue with the common model
|
||||
> of measuring operational success by negative overrun,
|
||||
> as it is incompatible with the preferable target of estimate certainty.
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Role of the Estimator
|
||||
|
||||
The role of the estimator is to model the potential cost distribution of the project,
|
||||
taking actions to reduce the model's uncertainty.
|
||||
|
||||
The effect of estimating methods can be represented as $d\sigma$,
|
||||
thus efficiency is $\frac{d\sigma}{dt}$.
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Role of the Executive
|
||||
|
||||
The role of the executive is to allocate profit and contingency
|
||||
according to the potential cost distribution
|
||||
weighted by the organizational desire to win the project.
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
{E}[P]=
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
## Misconceptions
|
||||
|
||||
### Standard Practices
|
||||
@@ -82,7 +39,7 @@ that errors aren't set in stone
|
||||
until a contract is signed.
|
||||
|
||||
Destigmatizing proposal retraction is of critical concern for subcontractors.
|
||||
See [[estimating-culture]] for more on estimate error game theory.
|
||||
See [[estimating-culture]] for more on estimate error [[strategy#Game Theory]].
|
||||
|
||||
It's important to recognize that retracting a proposal
|
||||
may upset a few people employed by the GC,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- occupational
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Design Build Budget
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3,7 +3,9 @@ id:
|
||||
aliases:
|
||||
- das
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- occupational/systems/standalone-systems
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
||||
id: electrical
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- occupational/systems/electrical
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Electrical
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,26 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/fleeting
|
||||
- topic/automation
|
||||
- topic/estimating
|
||||
- topic/software
|
||||
- type/idea
|
||||
title: Estimating as Code
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Estimating as Code
|
||||
|
||||
## Compared to Existing Frameworks
|
||||
|
||||
Traditional methods interact with an existing database.
|
||||
EaC builds a static database at runtime.
|
||||
|
||||
## Project Structure
|
||||
|
||||
Organizational info (items, assemblies) as submodules.
|
||||
Solves database conflicts by pinning estimates to a commit.
|
||||
|
||||
[[assembly-objects]]
|
||||
|
||||
[[breakdown-objects]]
|
||||
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/uncertain
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- topic/estimating
|
||||
- topic/organization
|
||||
- type/philosophy
|
||||
@@ -39,7 +41,7 @@ With intelligent work breakdown, jobs can be cleanly segmented for work in paral
|
||||
Estimators working in the same room can be an invaluable resource
|
||||
for brainstorming ideas and beneficial conversation.
|
||||
|
||||
It is the failure of [[estimating-culture]]
|
||||
It is the failure of estimating culture
|
||||
and of [[construction-estimating-software]]
|
||||
that so many estimators are wary of collaboration.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+14
-8
@@ -2,31 +2,36 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/uncertain
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/estimating
|
||||
- type/philosophy
|
||||
title: Estimating Detail
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Estimating Detail
|
||||
|
||||
The acceptable level of detail of an [[construction-estimating|estimate]] is a contentious subject.
|
||||
What's worse, estimators often disagree on what makes an estimate more detailed than another.
|
||||
The acceptable level of detail of an estimate
|
||||
in [[construction-estimating]] is a contentious subject.
|
||||
What's worse, estimators often disagree
|
||||
on what makes an estimate more detailed than another.
|
||||
|
||||
The commonly repeated answer is this:
|
||||
|
||||
> As detailed as possible, given required turnaround and available estimating resources.
|
||||
> As detailed as possible,
|
||||
> given required turnaround and available estimating resources.
|
||||
|
||||
This analysis is flawed
|
||||
because it implies more time ought to be preferred,
|
||||
when the reality is that when considering larger organizational factors (strategy),
|
||||
because it implies more time always ought to be preferred,
|
||||
when the reality is that when considering larger organizational factors,
|
||||
ideal estimate certainty is likely far lower than most expect.
|
||||
|
||||
The _correct_ correct answer involves optimizing for these factors:
|
||||
The correct answer involves optimizing for these factors:
|
||||
* value of increased bid certainty
|
||||
* value of increased estimate volume
|
||||
|
||||
An estimate's detail is irrelevant to its quality.
|
||||
A less detailed estimate is a more [[risk|risky]] bid,
|
||||
but **it is not the role of the estimator to determine acceptable risk**.
|
||||
but it is not the role of the estimator to determine acceptable risk.
|
||||
|
||||
## Experiment
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -35,7 +40,8 @@ the maximum amount you would ever consider using,
|
||||
and measure the time required to do so,
|
||||
as well as the cost of the scope.
|
||||
|
||||
Have another estimator takeoff the same scope using the proposed time saving strategy.
|
||||
Have another estimator takeoff the same scope
|
||||
using the proposed time saving strategy.
|
||||
|
||||
Repeat the test on additional projects.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/uncertain
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/estimating
|
||||
- topic/organization
|
||||
- topic/software
|
||||
@@ -10,15 +12,54 @@ title: Estimating Dimensionality
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Estimating Dimensionality
|
||||
|
||||
I think of most things as existing in n-dimensional space.
|
||||
## Flaws of Traditional Estimating Methods: Enforced Linearity
|
||||
|
||||
## Generic
|
||||
Something that I've realized that really bothers me
|
||||
about the the traditional methods
|
||||
(e.g. database-based takeoff, audit-trail-type-abstraction)
|
||||
is the the _enforced linearity_,
|
||||
which is at odds with the reality of takeoff.
|
||||
|
||||
No matter how you slice it,
|
||||
the user is thinking about your takeoff in some linear fashion.
|
||||
Whether it's the takeoff creation date, or however they've sorted it,
|
||||
Really date is the only useful measure,
|
||||
but it's also useless, because you forget stuff.
|
||||
|
||||
The fact that forgetting something
|
||||
totally disrupts a previously logical timeline of takeoffs
|
||||
means that you stress about every single takeoff;
|
||||
Instead of being in a flow state,
|
||||
you have to be thinking 10 steps ahead.
|
||||
|
||||
I mean, I do, because I care about that sort of thing.
|
||||
I suppose other people may not be as concerned,
|
||||
but that doesn't really justify it.
|
||||
|
||||
The problem is that there's nothing linear about electrical installations,
|
||||
at best it's a directed acyclic graph.
|
||||
You can almost represent that linearly
|
||||
if you go down each branch to the end
|
||||
and then pick a new new line,
|
||||
but that's unideal.
|
||||
|
||||
## Spatial Indexing
|
||||
|
||||
Scope exists in a three-dimensional space,
|
||||
more if you suppose phases and bid options
|
||||
as having a position on time and decision space axes respectively.
|
||||
|
||||
The most idiomatic alternative to time-indexed takeoffs
|
||||
would be to represent them in the space of the drawings,
|
||||
then only extend them as necessary.
|
||||
|
||||
### Generic
|
||||
|
||||
Negative <-> Positive
|
||||
|
||||
Previous <-> Next
|
||||
|
||||
## Space
|
||||
### Space
|
||||
|
||||
Down <-> Up
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -32,11 +73,11 @@ South <-> North
|
||||
|
||||
Ana <-> Kata
|
||||
|
||||
## Time
|
||||
### Time
|
||||
|
||||
Past <-> Future
|
||||
Prin <-> Kat
|
||||
|
||||
Before <-> After
|
||||
|
||||
## Option
|
||||
### Option
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/uncertain
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- topic/estimating
|
||||
- type/philosophy
|
||||
title: Estimating Methodologies
|
||||
@@ -88,8 +90,7 @@ are least likely to consider it a valid method.
|
||||
|
||||
These methods are actually the same, just different levels of abstraction.
|
||||
This can be observed in the _very_ subtle distinction
|
||||
between parametric and analogous estimating,
|
||||
which also exists in my history-oriented/risk-oriented definitions.
|
||||
between parametric and analogous estimating.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
# of Parameters
|
||||
@@ -106,6 +107,6 @@ Parametric is obviously more accurate and precise than analogous,
|
||||
however the question not being asked
|
||||
is if there are diminishing returns to estimate specificity.
|
||||
|
||||
Suppose there are, at some point then,
|
||||
Suppose there are: at some point then,
|
||||
there must then be a point at which **risk of human error**
|
||||
outweighs the value of more perfect information.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/uncertain
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/estimating
|
||||
- type/philosophy
|
||||
title: Estimating Philosophy
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
||||
formulas:
|
||||
destiny: file.tags.filter(value.contains("destiny"))
|
||||
status: file.tags.filter(value.contains("status"))
|
||||
type: file.tags.filter(value.contains("type"))
|
||||
linkText: (["[[",file.name,"]]"]).join("")
|
||||
views:
|
||||
- type: table
|
||||
name: Table
|
||||
filters:
|
||||
and:
|
||||
- file.hasTag("topic/estimating")
|
||||
- '!file.hasTag("type/media-commentary")'
|
||||
- '!file.hasTag("type/anecdote")'
|
||||
order:
|
||||
- file.name
|
||||
- title
|
||||
- file.size
|
||||
- formula.destiny
|
||||
- formula.status
|
||||
- formula.type
|
||||
- formula.linkText
|
||||
sort:
|
||||
- property: file.size
|
||||
direction: DESC
|
||||
columnSize:
|
||||
note.title: 290
|
||||
- type: table
|
||||
name: View
|
||||
@@ -2,28 +2,94 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/fleeting
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/estimating
|
||||
- topic/risk
|
||||
- type/encyclopedia
|
||||
title: Calibration Questions
|
||||
title: Estimator Calibration
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Calibration Questions
|
||||
# Estimator Calibration
|
||||
|
||||
## Examples
|
||||
Calibration is the process of learning to compensate for one's biases
|
||||
in order to produce more accurate estimates.
|
||||
|
||||
### Boolean
|
||||
Generally speaking, people tend to underestimate [[risk]]
|
||||
and tend to be overconfident of their estimates.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!note] Confidence
|
||||
> **Confidence** is an estimate of the accuracy of another estimate.
|
||||
> To be "overconfident" is to consistently rate one's confidence
|
||||
> above the observed accuracy of their estimates.
|
||||
|
||||
An estimator who is well calibrated
|
||||
can properly account for such bias.
|
||||
|
||||
## Calibration Questions
|
||||
|
||||
Calibration is generally achieved
|
||||
by having the estimator make many estimates,
|
||||
then immediately observe their results.
|
||||
|
||||
This is repeated in rounds of question and review
|
||||
until the desired results are achieved.
|
||||
|
||||
### Writing Good Calibration Questions
|
||||
|
||||
#### Ideal Difficulty
|
||||
|
||||
Calibration requires that the estimator have some confidence,
|
||||
but not total certainty, in their response.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!failure] Bad
|
||||
> T/F: When rolling 2 dice, a roll of 7 is more likely than a 3.
|
||||
|
||||
#### No "Trick" Questions
|
||||
|
||||
Questions should be unambiguously verifiable.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!failure] Bad
|
||||
>
|
||||
> > T/F: Any male pig is referred to as a hog.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Referred to by whom?
|
||||
|
||||
> [!failure] Bad
|
||||
>
|
||||
> > T/F: In English, the word "quality" is more frequently used that the word "speed".
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Used more frequently where?
|
||||
|
||||
> [!success] Good
|
||||
>
|
||||
> > T/F: Pakistan shares a border with Russia
|
||||
|
||||
> [!tip]
|
||||
> Definitions, terminology, and language are _always_ contentious,
|
||||
> questions based on them always feel deceptive.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Phrasing
|
||||
|
||||
Interval "questions" should describe the quantity
|
||||
rather than phrase it as a question.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!failure] Bad
|
||||
> Q: How many gold medals did Jesse Owens win at the 1936 Berlin Olympics?
|
||||
|
||||
> [!success] Good
|
||||
> Q: Number of gold medals won by Jesse Owens in the 1936 Berlin Olympics
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategy for Answering Calibration Questions
|
||||
|
||||
Confidence should never be less than probability of picking randomly
|
||||
(50% for true)
|
||||
|
||||
### Examples
|
||||
|
||||
#### Boolean
|
||||
|
||||
> The melting point of tin is higher than the melting point of aluminum.
|
||||
|
||||
> In English, the word "quality" is more frequently used that the word "speed".
|
||||
|
||||
reductive (used more frequently where?)
|
||||
|
||||
> Any male pig is referred to as a hog.
|
||||
|
||||
reductive (referred to by whom?)
|
||||
|
||||
> California's giant sequoia trees are named for an early 19th century leader of the Cherokee Indians.
|
||||
|
||||
reductive
|
||||
@@ -32,10 +98,6 @@ reductive
|
||||
|
||||
reductive (Henry Ford didn't produce cars)
|
||||
|
||||
> When rolling 2 dice, a roll of 7 is more likely than a 3.
|
||||
|
||||
facile
|
||||
|
||||
> No one has ever been reported to have been hit by any object that fell from space.
|
||||
|
||||
reductive (reported by whom?)
|
||||
@@ -86,7 +148,7 @@ borderline facile, deceptive phrasing
|
||||
|
||||
obtuse phrasing, dated topic, otherwise good
|
||||
|
||||
### Interval
|
||||
#### Interval
|
||||
|
||||
> What percentage of bronze is typically made of copper?
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -114,18 +176,3 @@ As of when?
|
||||
> In 2005, the average combined MPG for all US cars and light trucks on the road was how much?
|
||||
> The average house in the United States uses how many gallons of water per day?
|
||||
> What was the average price in the United States of a house sold in 2001?
|
||||
|
||||
## Writing Good Calibration Questions
|
||||
|
||||
A good calibration question should not feel like it could be a "trick" question.
|
||||
|
||||
Definitions/terminology are _always_ contentious,
|
||||
questions based on them always feel deceptive.
|
||||
|
||||
Interval "questions" should describe the quantity
|
||||
rather than phrase it as a question.
|
||||
|
||||
## Strategy for Answering Calibration Questions
|
||||
|
||||
Confidence should never be less than probability of picking randomly
|
||||
(50% for true)
|
||||
+5
-1
@@ -3,9 +3,13 @@ id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- authorship/other
|
||||
- destiny/uncertain
|
||||
- occupational
|
||||
title: ""
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
title: Estimator Skills
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Estimator Skills
|
||||
|
||||
## Create a WBS
|
||||
|
||||
* Responsible Party: Associate/Estimator
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
|
||||
id: excel-macros
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- topic/software
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Excel Macros
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
|
||||
id: feeders
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- occupational/systems/feeders
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Feeders
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- occupational/systems/fire-alarm
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Fire Alarm
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- occupational/systems/fixtures
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Fixture Designations
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- occupational/systems/fixtures
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Fixtures
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/uncertain
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/estimating
|
||||
- topic/math
|
||||
- type/idea
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/fleeting
|
||||
- status/complete
|
||||
- topic/automation
|
||||
- topic/estimating
|
||||
- type/idea
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,11 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/fleeting
|
||||
- status/complete
|
||||
- topic/estimating
|
||||
- topic/risk
|
||||
- type/encyclopedia
|
||||
title: Gold Plating
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Gold Plating
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
||||
id: grounding
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- occupational/systems/feeders
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Grounding
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,16 +1,12 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
<<<<<<< HEAD
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- destiny/uncertain
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/electrical
|
||||
- type/encyclopedia
|
||||
title: HVAC Calculations
|
||||
=======
|
||||
tags: []
|
||||
>>>>>>> origin/main
|
||||
---
|
||||
# HVAC Calculations
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- occupational/systems/electrical
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Lighting Controls
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- occupational/systems/lightning-protection
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Lightning Protection
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- occupational/systems/low-voltage
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Low Voltage
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- occupational
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Material Pricing
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,10 @@
|
||||
id: me
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- topic/meta
|
||||
- type/encyclopedia
|
||||
title: Me
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Me
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- occupational/systems
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Misc Budgets
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
-56
@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- authorship/other
|
||||
- occupational
|
||||
title: NEW HIRE - ESTIMATOR
|
||||
---
|
||||
# NEW HIRE - ESTIMATOR
|
||||
|
||||
| | |
|
||||
| --------------- | -------------------------------------------- |
|
||||
| **Department:** | Construction Estimating |
|
||||
| **Date:** | 06/09/2025 (Onboarding) – 06/16/2025 at desk |
|
||||
| **Employee:** | Zane Meyers |
|
||||
|
||||
## Expectations and Responsibilities
|
||||
|
||||
### WBS and Unit Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
* Develop the correct project setup in the WBS spreadsheet & Accubid
|
||||
based on building type, construction method and market.
|
||||
|
||||
* Create project WBS and Unit Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
### Means and Methods
|
||||
|
||||
* Determining means and methods from project documents
|
||||
|
||||
* Fill out project OneNote checklist for assigned scopes
|
||||
|
||||
### Accubid/LiveCount
|
||||
|
||||
* Estimate assigned projects using knowledge
|
||||
of PDI scopes, sort codes, NEC and regional requirements
|
||||
|
||||
* Proper Accubid take-off
|
||||
|
||||
### Note Taking
|
||||
|
||||
* Improve accuracy/quality of estimates.
|
||||
|
||||
* Taking notes during trainings,
|
||||
correcting mistakes in take-off,
|
||||
and documenting/referencing feedback for future projects
|
||||
|
||||
### Prioritize
|
||||
|
||||
* Maintain checkpoints with Sr. Estimator for priority items/projects
|
||||
|
||||
* Check Smartsheets
|
||||
|
||||
## Goals
|
||||
|
||||
* Complete a full-take-off within first 6 months of start
|
||||
* Complete Accubid tabs within first year of start
|
||||
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- destiny/uncertain
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/electrical
|
||||
- type/encyclopedia
|
||||
- type/media
|
||||
title: Article 110 Requirements for Electrical Installations
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Article 110 Requirements for Electrical Installations
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- destiny/uncertain
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/electrical
|
||||
- type/encyclopedia
|
||||
- type/media
|
||||
title: NEC Article 210 Branch Circuits
|
||||
---
|
||||
# NEC Article 210 Branch Circuits
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- destiny/uncertain
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/electrical
|
||||
- type/encyclopedia
|
||||
- type/media
|
||||
title: Article 215 Feeders
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Article 215 Feeders
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- destiny/uncertain
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/electrical
|
||||
- type/encyclopedia
|
||||
- type/media
|
||||
title: Article 220 Branch-Circuit, Feeder, and Service Load Calculations
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Article 220 Branch-Circuit, Feeder, and Service Load Calculations
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- destiny/uncertain
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/electrical
|
||||
- type/encyclopedia
|
||||
- type/media
|
||||
title: Article 310 Conductors for General Wiring
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Article 310 Conductors for General Wiring
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- destiny/uncertain
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/electrical
|
||||
- type/encyclopedia
|
||||
- type/media
|
||||
title: Article 314 Outlet, Device, Pull, and Junction Boxes; Conduit Bodies; Fittings; and Handhole Enclosures
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Article 314 Outlet, Device, Pull, and Junction Boxes; Conduit Bodies; Fittings; and Handhole Enclosures
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- destiny/uncertain
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/electrical
|
||||
- type/encyclopedia
|
||||
- type/media
|
||||
title: Article 430 Motors, Motor Circuits, and Controllers
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Article 430 Motors, Motor Circuits, and Controllers
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- destiny/uncertain
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/electrical
|
||||
- type/encyclopedia
|
||||
- type/media
|
||||
title: Article 450 Transformers and Transformer Vaults (Including Secondary Ties)
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Article 450 Transformers and Transformer Vaults (Including Secondary Ties)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,14 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- topic/estimating
|
||||
title: Open Problems in Estimating
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Open Problems in Estimating
|
||||
|
||||
[[construction-estimating]] being a nascent and unstudied field,
|
||||
there are several fundamental questions of the craft
|
||||
without satisfying answers.
|
||||
|
||||
* How detailed should an estimate be? How can you know?
|
||||
@@ -2,121 +2,19 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- authorship/original
|
||||
- destiny/fleeting
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/estimating
|
||||
- topic/software
|
||||
- type/idea
|
||||
title: Estimating Ergonomics
|
||||
title: Optimal Estimating Patterns
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Estimating Ergonomics
|
||||
# Optimal Estimating Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[[construction-estimating-software]] consistently fails to innovate
|
||||
on the stale patterns developed for marginally similar applications decades ago.
|
||||
|
||||
## More Optimal Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
It must be noted that, while these optimizations are better patterns than those of traditional applications,
|
||||
the bigger problem with those applications is their suboptimal implementation of those patterns.
|
||||
If you could just do what they're trying to do correctly,
|
||||
you probably wouldn't need all these optimizations anyway.
|
||||
|
||||
### Sketch-Based Lookup
|
||||
|
||||
A better use for computer vision in estimating
|
||||
is sketch based assembly lookup.
|
||||
Probably the the biggest hang-up in the workflow
|
||||
is searching through available assemblies and items based on text,
|
||||
which has a number of problems,
|
||||
mostly that names, in electrical material for certain, are practically meaningless.
|
||||
|
||||
Trade names are incorrect, and there are often many different names for the same item.
|
||||
Basically, there's just so many problems with text-based lookup as a rule.
|
||||
That sketching and handwriting recognition would be more idiomatic.
|
||||
|
||||
To draw lines, angles representing bends, squiggly lines representing flexible conduit.
|
||||
All things that are common conventions that estimators are probably drawing in their workflow anyway.
|
||||
|
||||
Many parts of the estimating workflow would be greatly benefited
|
||||
by the sort of non-traditional interface that Ink & Switch promotes.
|
||||
Traditionally estimating software is all tables and forms.
|
||||
|
||||
Suppose you were to sketch a takeoff indicating a run
|
||||
|
||||
1. from a panel
|
||||
2. up to the ceiling
|
||||
3. across the building
|
||||
4. down to a disconnect
|
||||
5. out through a flex connection
|
||||
6. to a piece of equipment
|
||||
|
||||
that's a very complex assembly,
|
||||
and despite how common it is,
|
||||
it can be very difficult to to get exactly that from databases.
|
||||
|
||||
But you draw that that sketch and it creates a graph of all the primitive parts of that assembly.
|
||||
It includes the panel and the equipment
|
||||
on the off chance that you actually want to install them or haven't included them elsewhere.
|
||||
All this on a graph in that same interface where you drew the sketch.
|
||||
With the same stylus you used to draw the sketch,
|
||||
you just cross out the panel, the equipment,
|
||||
the parts that that you didn't want to include.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Draw a line from start to end.
|
||||
* A canvas appears on top of the plans.
|
||||
2. Sketch the desired assembly with predetermined conventions.
|
||||
3. Draw a checkmark to confirm
|
||||
* A render of the interpreted assembly appears
|
||||
4. Draw a second checkmark to select.
|
||||
|
||||
A Non-Traditional Computing approach (journal-type, heavy-stylus-use),
|
||||
would would be great here, too.
|
||||
|
||||
Keyboards as a takeoff input device are an anti-pattern.
|
||||
Every time you're entering data is an interruption.
|
||||
|
||||
But perfect for that would be drawing takeoffs on the on the prints
|
||||
then using stylus based interaction patterns to edit them.
|
||||
Lasso selecting groups of takeoffs to change aspects of them.
|
||||
|
||||
There is so little typing necessary.
|
||||
Everything that you're typing is just short descriptors
|
||||
that, in a lot of cases, don't even need to exist.
|
||||
the language exists purely to roughly communicate ideas
|
||||
that are intuitive in even a crude sketch.
|
||||
|
||||
Estimating is a perfect use case for a purely stylus and handwriting recognition based workflow,
|
||||
probably more perfect than whatever Ink & Switch is using.
|
||||
|
||||
### Spatial Indexing
|
||||
|
||||
Scope exists in a three-dimensional space,
|
||||
more if you suppose phases and bid options
|
||||
as having a position on time and decision space axes respectively.
|
||||
|
||||
The most idiomatic alternative to time-indexed takeoffs
|
||||
would be to represent them in the space of the drawings,
|
||||
then only extend them as necessary.
|
||||
|
||||
%%
|
||||
|
||||
### Scratch
|
||||
|
||||
Minimize takeoff flow disruption
|
||||
|
||||
Decouple takeoff (description of work) from assembly selection:
|
||||
|
||||
Match takeoff tags against assembly tags, select best
|
||||
|
||||
Expect uncertainty
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
length: 20-30ft
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Uniform distribution
|
||||
|
||||
%%
|
||||
|
||||
## Flaws of Traditional Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### Required Hyper-Specificity
|
||||
@@ -139,39 +37,121 @@ if they were good.
|
||||
It's just that it doesn't seem to be a goal
|
||||
that Trimble or anybody else has.
|
||||
|
||||
### Enforced Linearity
|
||||
|
||||
Something that I've realized that really bothers me
|
||||
about the the traditional methods
|
||||
(e.g. database-based takeoff, audit-trail-type-abstraction)
|
||||
is the the _enforced linearity_,
|
||||
which is at odds with the reality of takeoff.
|
||||
|
||||
No matter how you slice it,
|
||||
the user is thinking about your takeoff in some linear fashion.
|
||||
Whether it's the takeoff creation date, or however they've sorted it,
|
||||
Really date is the only useful measure,
|
||||
but it's also useless, because you forget stuff.
|
||||
|
||||
The fact that forgetting something
|
||||
totally disrupts a previously logical timeline of takeoffs
|
||||
means that you stress about every single takeoff;
|
||||
Instead of being in a flow state,
|
||||
you have to be thinking 10 steps ahead.
|
||||
|
||||
I mean, I do, because I care about that sort of thing.
|
||||
I suppose other people may not be as concerned,
|
||||
but that doesn't really justify it.
|
||||
|
||||
The problem is that there's nothing linear about electrical installations,
|
||||
at best it's a directed acyclic graph.
|
||||
You can almost represent that linearly
|
||||
if you go down each branch to the end
|
||||
and then pick a new new line,
|
||||
but that's unideal.
|
||||
|
||||
### Assumed Finality
|
||||
|
||||
While they may support a multitude of creative methods to create takeoffs,
|
||||
traditional methods are rarely as convenient when it comes to modify those takeoffs,
|
||||
as is frequently necessary as in the case of mistakes and revisions.
|
||||
|
||||
## More Optimal Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
> [!note]
|
||||
> Note that while the patterns described below
|
||||
> _are_ more optimal than those of traditional applications,
|
||||
> the bigger problem with such applications
|
||||
> is their suboptimal implementation of their patterns.
|
||||
> If you could just do what they're trying to do correctly,
|
||||
> you probably wouldn't need all these optimizations anyway.
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- TODO:
|
||||
|
||||
Count-based takeoff speed increases with count.
|
||||
|
||||
Optimizing the takeoff process means:
|
||||
|
||||
* _Minimizing_ the need for information outside of drawings
|
||||
* _Maximizing_ organizational consistency
|
||||
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
## More "Innovative" Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
These ideas are farther out there
|
||||
in terms of what existing estimators may be willing to accept
|
||||
|
||||
### Estimating As Code
|
||||
|
||||
#### Compared to Existing Frameworks
|
||||
|
||||
Traditional methods interact with an existing database.
|
||||
EaC builds a static database at runtime.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Project Structure
|
||||
|
||||
Organizational info (items, assemblies) as submodules.
|
||||
Solves database conflicts by pinning estimates to a commit.
|
||||
|
||||
[[breakdown-objects]]
|
||||
[[assembly-objects]]
|
||||
|
||||
### Sketch-Based Lookup
|
||||
|
||||
A better use for computer vision in estimating
|
||||
is sketch based assembly lookup.
|
||||
Probably the the biggest hang-up in the workflow
|
||||
is searching through available assemblies and items based on text,
|
||||
which has a number of problems,
|
||||
mostly that names, in electrical material for certain, are practically meaningless.
|
||||
|
||||
Trade names are incorrect, and there are often many different names for the same item.
|
||||
Basically, there's just so many problems with text-based lookup as a rule.
|
||||
That sketching and handwriting recognition would be more idiomatic.
|
||||
|
||||
Drawing lines for raceways, angles representing bends,
|
||||
squiggly lines representing flexible conduit, etc.
|
||||
All things that are common sketching conventions
|
||||
that estimators are probably drawing in their workflow anyway.
|
||||
|
||||
Many parts of the estimating workflow would be greatly benefited
|
||||
by the sort of non-traditional interface that Ink & Switch promotes.
|
||||
Traditionally estimating software is all tables and forms.
|
||||
|
||||
Suppose you were to sketch a takeoff indicating a run
|
||||
|
||||
1. from a panel
|
||||
2. up to the ceiling
|
||||
3. across the building
|
||||
4. down to a disconnect
|
||||
5. out through a flex connection
|
||||
6. to a piece of equipment
|
||||
|
||||
that's a very complex assembly,
|
||||
and despite how common it is,
|
||||
it can be very difficult to to get exactly that from databases.
|
||||
|
||||
Suppose instead you draw that that sketch
|
||||
and the application creates a graph
|
||||
of all the primitive parts of that assembly.
|
||||
|
||||
It may include the panel and the equipment by default
|
||||
but with the same stylus you used to draw the sketch,
|
||||
you just cross out the panel, the equipment,
|
||||
the parts that that you didn't intend to include.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Draw a line from start to end.
|
||||
* A canvas appears on top of the plans.
|
||||
2. Sketch the desired assembly with predetermined conventions.
|
||||
3. Draw a checkmark to confirm
|
||||
* A render of the interpreted assembly appears
|
||||
4. Draw a second checkmark to select.
|
||||
|
||||
A Non-Traditional Computing approach
|
||||
(journal-type, heavy-stylus-use),
|
||||
would would be great here, too.
|
||||
|
||||
Keyboards as a takeoff input device are an anti-pattern.
|
||||
Every time you're entering data is an interruption.
|
||||
|
||||
But perfect for that would be drawing takeoffs on the on the prints
|
||||
then using stylus based interaction patterns to edit them.
|
||||
Lasso selecting groups of takeoffs to change aspects of them.
|
||||
|
||||
There is so little typing necessary.
|
||||
Everything that you're typing is just short descriptors
|
||||
that, in a lot of cases, don't even need to exist.
|
||||
the language exists purely to roughly communicate ideas
|
||||
that are intuitive in even a crude sketch.
|
||||
|
||||
Estimating is a perfect use case
|
||||
for a purely stylus and handwriting recognition based workflow,
|
||||
probably more perfect than whatever Ink & Switch is using.
|
||||
+5
-3
@@ -2,13 +2,15 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/complete
|
||||
- topic/other
|
||||
- type/encyclopedia
|
||||
title: Aeldari
|
||||
title: Owned Models
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Aeldari
|
||||
# Owned Models
|
||||
|
||||
## Owned Models
|
||||
## Aeldari
|
||||
|
||||
[Yvraine (100pts)](https://wahapedia.ru/wh40k10ed/factions/aeldari/Yvraine)
|
||||
* 1x Yvraine with Storm of Whispers, Kha-vir
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- occupational/systems
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Blank System
|
||||
---
|
||||
# PDI Estimating Systems
|
||||
|
||||
![[topics.base]]
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- occupational
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Pre-Takeoff Confirmation
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- occupational
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
next: setup-accubid
|
||||
title: Project Setup
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/estimating
|
||||
- type/philosophy
|
||||
title: The Purpose of Construction Estimating
|
||||
---
|
||||
# The Purpose of Construction Estimating
|
||||
|
||||
The purpose of [[construction-estimating]] in practice
|
||||
is not to determine the cost of the scope,
|
||||
which would take far longer than allotted for bid,
|
||||
|
||||
## For the Solicitor
|
||||
|
||||
* Determine feasibility of functional requirements
|
||||
|
||||
> [!info] Type 2 Owners
|
||||
> For some owners, money is no object,
|
||||
> and standardization is far more important
|
||||
> than any potential construction savings.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> These owners can be expected to decline
|
||||
> every [[value-engineering]] option offered
|
||||
> (see [[gold-plating]]).
|
||||
|
||||
## For the Contractor
|
||||
|
||||
* Make profit to meet growth target
|
||||
* Secure work for current and projected employees (fill backlog)
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- TODO: "Determine the sale price of a service" -->
|
||||
|
||||
> [!aside]
|
||||
> I take increasing issue with the common model
|
||||
> of measuring operational success by negative overrun,
|
||||
> as it is incompatible with the preferable target of estimate certainty.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Role of the Estimator
|
||||
|
||||
The role of the estimator
|
||||
is to model the potential cost distribution of the project,
|
||||
taking actions to reduce the model's uncertainty.
|
||||
|
||||
The effect of estimating methods can be represented as $d\sigma$,
|
||||
thus efficiency is $\frac{d\sigma}{dt}$.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Role of the Executive
|
||||
|
||||
The role of the executive is to allocate profit and contingency
|
||||
according to the potential cost distribution
|
||||
weighted by the organizational desire to win the project.
|
||||
+19
-33
@@ -2,20 +2,31 @@
|
||||
id: risk-oriented-estimating
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/uncertain
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/estimating
|
||||
- topic/risk
|
||||
- type/philosophy
|
||||
title: Risk Oriented Estimating
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Risk Oriented Estimating
|
||||
|
||||
Risk-Oriented Estimating (ROE), is a methodology for [[construction-estimating]]
|
||||
which:
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
As catchy as the name is,
|
||||
it may be more effective to communicate these thoughts as
|
||||
a thorough critique of the limitations of traditional methods,
|
||||
a
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
Risk-Oriented Estimating (ROE),
|
||||
is a [[estimating-methodologies|methodology]]
|
||||
for [[construction-estimating]] which:
|
||||
* prioritizes estimating tasks,
|
||||
* determines necessary [[estimating-detail]]
|
||||
|
||||
ROE leans heavily on [[uncertainty#Value of Information]],
|
||||
which challenges the natural tendency to shy from uncertainty
|
||||
with the reality of the cost of certainty.
|
||||
with the reality of the **cost of certainty**.
|
||||
|
||||
ROE does not endorse common shortcuts that round up to "cover" uncertainty,
|
||||
as these ultimately _increase_ risk by inflating the apparent project cost,
|
||||
@@ -59,34 +70,13 @@ For systems where EVI analysis determines manual takeoff is still necessary,
|
||||
optimizations can be made to decrease the required effort of takeoff,
|
||||
and thus the opportunity cost of takeoff.
|
||||
|
||||
Count-based takeoff speed increases with count.
|
||||
|
||||
Optimizing the takeoff process means:
|
||||
|
||||
* _Minimizing_ the need for information outside of drawings
|
||||
* _Maximizing_ organizational consistency
|
||||
|
||||
> [!note]
|
||||
> Recent events have complicated my philosophy above.
|
||||
> It appears that similar efforts have already been made here,
|
||||
> their success being a matter of perspective.
|
||||
> Is it acceptable that optimal
|
||||
|
||||
#### Naming Conventions (Use Case vs. Description)
|
||||
|
||||
Naming by use case is intuitive for those without estimating or field experience,
|
||||
but has the side effect that those accustomed to the names
|
||||
will inevitably _treat them as descriptive_.
|
||||
|
||||
| Use Case | Description |
|
||||
| ------------------- | ------------- |
|
||||
| Hi-Hat | Daisy-Chain |
|
||||
| Furnished By Others | Rough-In Only |
|
||||
See [[optimal-estimating-patterns]] for more.
|
||||
|
||||
## Potential Objections
|
||||
|
||||
Objections to the use of historical data in new estimates are not unfounded. A
|
||||
framework to do so competently and consistently does not currently exist.
|
||||
Objections to the use of historical data in new estimates are not unfounded.
|
||||
A framework to do so competently and consistently
|
||||
does not currently exist.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!info]
|
||||
> Nor does the software necessary to utilize such a framework efficiently.
|
||||
@@ -110,10 +100,6 @@ to quantify the dollar amount implications of our assumptions.
|
||||
There is an enormous gap in complexity between pure square foot pricing and
|
||||
[[traditional-estimating-methods]] that tools do not exist to bridge.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!aside]
|
||||
> The refusal to acknowledge the potential for more "complex" estimate models
|
||||
> hints at issues of organizational ignorance described ~~elsewhere in this vault~~.
|
||||
|
||||
At all points in the estimating process,
|
||||
It should be possible to give a confident budget.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -152,7 +138,7 @@ This interval can be determined from a population of possible prices.
|
||||
|
||||
The _accuracy_ of a risk-oriented estimate remains roughly the same
|
||||
(approaching 100% with continuous input)
|
||||
through the takeoff process and, assuming no incorrect input,
|
||||
through the takeoff process, and, assuming no incorrect input,
|
||||
is entirely out of the hands of the estimator doing the "takeoff".
|
||||
The previous chapters describe how a centralized system
|
||||
separates the concerns of adjustment factors
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,10 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/risk
|
||||
- type/encyclopedia
|
||||
title: Risk
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Risk
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10,6 +10,19 @@ title: Separating Estimating Concerns
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Separating Estimating Concerns
|
||||
|
||||
> [!info] Separation of Concerns
|
||||
> Separation of concerns is a design philosophy
|
||||
> of eliminating unnecessary process coupling,
|
||||
> or in other words preferring specialization.
|
||||
> It is traditionally understood as a principle strictly of _software_ design,
|
||||
> however its applications are universal.
|
||||
|
||||
%%
|
||||
Minimize takeoff flow disruption
|
||||
|
||||
Decouple takeoff (description of work) from assembly selection:
|
||||
%%
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Annotation
|
||||
|
||||
Annotation is documenting project scope as intended by its design.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- topic/organization
|
||||
title: Separation of Concerns
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Separation of Concerns
|
||||
|
||||
Separation of concerns is a design philosophy
|
||||
of eliminating unnecessary process coupling,
|
||||
or in other words preferring specialization.
|
||||
It is traditionally understood as a principle strictly of _software_ design,
|
||||
however its applications are universal.
|
||||
|
||||
## As Process Optimization
|
||||
|
||||
Suppose a small company has a single "administrative assistant"
|
||||
whose main functions include:
|
||||
|
||||
1. writing the company newsletter, and
|
||||
2. onboarding new hires.
|
||||
|
||||
Suppose this company doubles in size
|
||||
and these tasks can no longer be fulfilled by one employee.
|
||||
While it would be possible to hire another employee to share both roles,
|
||||
Separation of Concerns dictates that the role should be split by function.
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
||||
id: sleeving
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- occupational/systems
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Sleeving
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- occupational/systems/standalone-systems
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Standalone Systems
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
+7
-15
@@ -2,12 +2,16 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- topic/risk
|
||||
- type/encyclopedia
|
||||
title: Strategy
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
The field of strategy is concerned with the optimal solutions of problematic scenarios.
|
||||
The field of strategy is concerned
|
||||
with the optimal solutions of problematic scenarios.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision Theory
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -19,7 +23,8 @@ Decision theory concerns
|
||||
|
||||
## Game Theory
|
||||
|
||||
Game theory concerns decisions made in competition with other intelligent actors.
|
||||
Game theory concerns decisions
|
||||
made in competition with other intelligent actors.
|
||||
|
||||
Predictions of competitor behavior in bids and market movements
|
||||
are made with a game-theoretic lens.
|
||||
@@ -29,16 +34,3 @@ are made with a game-theoretic lens.
|
||||
Auction theory is a subset of game theory
|
||||
that specifically addresses the competitive bid format
|
||||
typical of construction project award.
|
||||
|
||||
## In Construction Contracting
|
||||
|
||||
**Executives** inform **Risk Tolerance**,
|
||||
**Risk Tolerance** informs **Minimum Estimate Certainty**
|
||||
|
||||
### Bid Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
Project cost certainty
|
||||
|
||||
#### Expected Competition
|
||||
|
||||
### Estimation Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
+7
-5
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- occupational/systems/subfeeds
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Subfeeds
|
||||
---
|
||||
@@ -29,8 +31,8 @@ title: Subfeeds
|
||||
|
||||
| Construction Type | Wiring Method | Subfeed Options |
|
||||
| ----------------- | ------------- | --------------- |
|
||||
| 1,2 | MC Cable | MC, PVC, EMT |
|
||||
| 3,4,5 | NM Cable | SER, EMT |
|
||||
| 1,2 | MC Cable | MC, PVC, EMT |
|
||||
| 3,4,5 | NM Cable | SER, EMT |
|
||||
|
||||
%%
|
||||
TODO: Create flow chart for wiring methods.
|
||||
@@ -67,9 +69,9 @@ Pigtail adaptors are used where feeder wires exceed the range of panel lugs.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!info]
|
||||
> "Pigtail adaptor" is the most common name and spelling for the device,
|
||||
> however it's something of a misnomer, having nothing to do with pigtails
|
||||
> (a short length of wire),
|
||||
> the name likely stemming from the device being used in lieu of a pigtail.
|
||||
> however it's something of a misnomer,
|
||||
> having nothing to do with pigtails (a short length of wire),
|
||||
> the name likely stemming from the device being used _in lieu_ of a pigtail.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Meter Center Troughs
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- occupational/systems/switchgear
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Switchgear
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ These tags are presented in an associative order.
|
||||
## #destiny
|
||||
|
||||
`#destiny` describes the permanency of an item.
|
||||
It does not necessarily reflect its current [[README#status]].
|
||||
It does not necessarily reflect its current [[tags#status]].
|
||||
|
||||
### #destiny/fleeting
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ and should be heavily tagged and linked.
|
||||
## #status
|
||||
|
||||
`#status` reflects the remaining work necessary
|
||||
to bring an item to the standard of its [[README#destiny]].
|
||||
to bring an item to the standard of its [[tags#destiny]].
|
||||
|
||||
### #status/incomplete
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Relating to the structure or intent of this notebook.
|
||||
Relating to specific software written by others,
|
||||
or hypothetical software functionality I've conceived.
|
||||
|
||||
The latter I generally relegate to [[README#destiny/fleeting]],
|
||||
The latter I generally relegate to [[tags#destiny/fleeting]],
|
||||
to be absorbed into the specifications of the relevant project
|
||||
when the idea is sufficiently developed.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -143,25 +143,31 @@ possibly including some details of how to go about it.
|
||||
They have the minimum amount of information
|
||||
necessary to allow me to return to them.
|
||||
|
||||
They are always? of [[README#destiny/fleeting]].
|
||||
They are always? of [[tags#destiny/fleeting]].
|
||||
|
||||
### #type/task
|
||||
|
||||
<!--TODO-->
|
||||
|
||||
### #type/guide
|
||||
|
||||
<!--TODO-->
|
||||
Items of `#type/guide` give instructions
|
||||
to complete a specific process.
|
||||
|
||||
### #type/encyclopedia
|
||||
|
||||
Items of `#type/encyclopedia` are thorough,
|
||||
use exact language, and include citations.
|
||||
|
||||
They describe concepts as they are, not as they should be.
|
||||
They describe concepts as they are,
|
||||
not as they should be.
|
||||
|
||||
### #type/philosophy
|
||||
|
||||
Items of `#type/philosophy` are highly opinionated.
|
||||
They describe concepts as I believe them to be.
|
||||
|
||||
They are always? of [[README#authorship/original]].
|
||||
They are always? of [[tags#authorship/original]].
|
||||
|
||||
### #type/anecdote
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -188,5 +194,5 @@ Content from other sources is properly cited.
|
||||
> It is subject to change.
|
||||
|
||||
Items of `#authorship/other` are not my own work.
|
||||
They may be of one source a collection of several
|
||||
They may be of one source or a collection of several
|
||||
without significant commentary.
|
||||
|
||||
+15
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
|
||||
filters:
|
||||
and:
|
||||
- file.hasTag("type/task")
|
||||
- file.name != "tags"
|
||||
views:
|
||||
- type: table
|
||||
name: all
|
||||
sort:
|
||||
- property: file.name
|
||||
direction: ASC
|
||||
- type: table
|
||||
name: meta
|
||||
filters:
|
||||
and:
|
||||
- file.hasTag("topic/meta")
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- occupational/systems/telecom
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Telecom
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
||||
id: the-failure-of-risk-management
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/uncertain
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/complete
|
||||
- topic/risk
|
||||
- type/media-commentary
|
||||
title: _The Failure of Risk Management_
|
||||
---
|
||||
@@ -54,7 +56,7 @@ It describes the process of "calibration"
|
||||
by which people can be trained to compensate for this bias
|
||||
and make predictions far more accurately.
|
||||
|
||||
See [[calibration-questions]] for more.
|
||||
See [[estimator-calibration]] for more.
|
||||
|
||||
Experts tend to be good at creating heuristics,
|
||||
but do not apply them consistently in practice.
|
||||
|
||||
+13
-1
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ I believe its all merely extrapolation on the conventional practice.
|
||||
|
||||
## Tone
|
||||
|
||||
I write as if someone else will read these notes.
|
||||
I write as if someone else will read these notes,
|
||||
I find this beneficial for my current and future selves.
|
||||
Explaining concepts completely
|
||||
forces me to understand them completely
|
||||
@@ -51,6 +51,13 @@ and to provide context I may be tempted to omit
|
||||
because it is obvious at the time of writing.
|
||||
When revisiting notes its then much easier to pick up where I left off.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!note]
|
||||
> It's recently been pointed out to me
|
||||
> that it can't possibly be my intent for others to read my notes,
|
||||
> since I tend use diction and syntax that is needlessly opaque.
|
||||
> I'm compelled to agree,
|
||||
> but I don't know how to reconcile that fact with my intent.
|
||||
|
||||
I often use an arrogant tone
|
||||
which helps me stop fiddling over specific wording and just write;
|
||||
somewhat similar to the technique of pretending you hate your audience
|
||||
@@ -65,3 +72,8 @@ but this notebook uses [semantic line breaks](https://sembr.org/)
|
||||
for text wrapping.
|
||||
|
||||
I shoot for less than 90 columns.
|
||||
|
||||
## TODO
|
||||
|
||||
This notebook is in constant need of maintenance.
|
||||
For the current backlog, see [[TODO]].
|
||||
|
||||
+23
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
|
||||
filters:
|
||||
and:
|
||||
- file.ext == "md"
|
||||
- file.name != "tags"
|
||||
views:
|
||||
- type: table
|
||||
name: estimating
|
||||
filters:
|
||||
and:
|
||||
- file.hasTag("topic/estimating")
|
||||
- type: table
|
||||
name: occupational-systems
|
||||
filters:
|
||||
and:
|
||||
- file.hasTag("occupational/systems")
|
||||
- type: table
|
||||
name: electrical
|
||||
filters:
|
||||
and:
|
||||
- file.hasTag("topic/electrical")
|
||||
sort:
|
||||
- property: file.name
|
||||
direction: ASC
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- occupational/systems/units
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Unit Takeoff
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
|
||||
<<<<<<< HEAD
|
||||
---
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
@@ -9,8 +8,6 @@ tags:
|
||||
- type/guide
|
||||
title: Windows Setup
|
||||
---
|
||||
=======
|
||||
>>>>>>> origin/main
|
||||
# Windows Setup
|
||||
|
||||
## Clone This Vault
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user