vault backup: 2025-10-10 14:37:17

estimating-methodologies.md

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
 id:
 aliases: []
 tags:
+  - destiny/uncertain
+  - status/draft
   - topic/estimating
   - type/philosophy
 title: Estimating Methodologies
@@ -88,8 +90,7 @@ are least likely to consider it a valid method.
 
 These methods are actually the same, just different levels of abstraction.
 This can be observed in the _very_ subtle distinction
-between parametric and analogous estimating,
-which also exists in my history-oriented/risk-oriented definitions.
+between parametric and analogous estimating.
 
 ```
 # of Parameters
@@ -106,6 +107,6 @@ Parametric is obviously more accurate and precise than analogous,
 however the question not being asked
 is if there are diminishing returns to estimate specificity.
 
-Suppose there are, at some point then,
+Suppose there are: at some point then,
 there must then be a point at which **risk of human error**
 outweighs the value of more perfect information.