vault backup: 2026-05-08 17:39:18
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Sham project compliance behaviour: Necessarily masking the reality of project work from senior management"
|
||||
tags: []
|
||||
authors:
|
||||
- Eric John Darling
|
||||
- Stephen Jonathan Whitty
|
||||
doi: 10.1108/IJMPB-05-2019-0118
|
||||
eprint: https://www.emerald.com/ijmpb/article-pdf/14/2/497/956331/ijmpb-05-2019-0118.pdf
|
||||
issn: 1753-8378
|
||||
journal: International Journal of Managing Projects in Business
|
||||
month: 11
|
||||
number: 2
|
||||
pages: 497-519
|
||||
url: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-05-2019-0118
|
||||
volume: 14
|
||||
year: 2019
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Sham project compliance behaviour: Necessarily masking the reality of project work from senior management
|
||||
|
||||
## Abstract
|
||||
|
||||
### Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
The purpose of this paper is to examine a case of sham compliance performance reporting
|
||||
through the lens of Goffman's dramaturgy to reveal its dramaturgical structure.
|
||||
It makes a methodological contribution to comprehending "lived experience" accounts of project work,
|
||||
and adds knowledge concerning the behind-the-scenes motivators to sham behaviour in project work.
|
||||
|
||||
### Design/methodology/approach
|
||||
|
||||
Using an ethnographic lived experience account,
|
||||
an aspect of project work is reconceptualised as a collection of dramaturgical scenes.
|
||||
These scenes disclose issues beyond the bounds of the traditional project management discourse,
|
||||
and increase knowledge and appreciation of sham and performative behaviour in project work.
|
||||
|
||||
### Findings
|
||||
|
||||
Sham progress reporting can emerge in an environment where senior management's ignorance of project work
|
||||
creates unworkable binds for project staff.
|
||||
Moreover, the sham behaviour succeeds at its objective
|
||||
because senior management are vulnerable to false impressions.
|
||||
This situation raises ethical issues for those involved,
|
||||
and creates an overhead in dealing with the reality of project work.
|
||||
|
||||
### Research limitations/implications
|
||||
|
||||
Limitations to this study are due to the inherent nature of the ethnographic method,
|
||||
where it is difficult to recruit willing participants,
|
||||
particularly in terms of sham behaviour cases.
|
||||
This study has implications for research on sham and performativity behaviour in project work,
|
||||
as studies can benefit from the dramaturgical analysis and Goffmanesque scene illustration techniques
|
||||
that help give focus to particular aspects of social performance,
|
||||
and remove complexity from the narrative.
|
||||
|
||||
### Practical implications
|
||||
|
||||
The research provides practitioners with a way of discussing superfluous compliance process
|
||||
using additional lived experience vocabulary.
|
||||
This could reduce the undue pressure to behave unethically,
|
||||
and reduce the burden to create the extra impression management work.
|
||||
|
||||
### Originality/value
|
||||
|
||||
This study brings a voice to sham behaviour in project work.
|
||||
Continued ignorance of sham behaviour results in unnecessary work and unprofitable projects.
|
||||
Individuals could pay a price in terms of stress and well-being, not discussed.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: 2026-05-08
|
||||
title: 2026-05-08
|
||||
tags: []
|
||||
weekly: "[[2026w19]]"
|
||||
monthly: "[[2026-05]]"
|
||||
quarterly: "[[2026q2]]"
|
||||
previous: "[[2026-05-07]]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
# 2026-05-08
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user