vault backup: 2026-02-25 08:15:32
This commit is contained in:
@@ -10,66 +10,3 @@ tags:
|
||||
dg-publish: true
|
||||
---
|
||||
# 2025-11-13
|
||||
|
||||
# 2025-11-13 08:03:??
|
||||
|
||||
#topic/hobbies/writing
|
||||
|
||||
I was thinking about recent critiques of my writing style
|
||||
and how they don't really apply to my speech,
|
||||
even though I don't imagine myself approaching them differently.
|
||||
|
||||
I imagine I _would_ speak like I write,
|
||||
but that to use the same constructions
|
||||
would require a level of forethought
|
||||
that I'm not capable of under the pressure of conversation.
|
||||
|
||||
# 2025-11-13 08:19:??
|
||||
|
||||
#topic/estimating #occupational
|
||||
|
||||
I'm still working on articulating
|
||||
my main difficulty in the transition
|
||||
from Ace to PDI estimating.
|
||||
|
||||
At a high level,
|
||||
it's that our process is built on _instrumental_ methods,
|
||||
but that it is frequently judged from a _realist_ perspective.
|
||||
See [[realism-vs-instrumentalism]].
|
||||
|
||||
There may be a more accurate way to state this.
|
||||
[[2025-11-10#2025-11-10 11 14]] may be an example of a similar issue,
|
||||
where instrumental methods are presented as if they were realist,
|
||||
causing confusion when the methods are,
|
||||
as judged from a realist perspective, wrong.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2025-11-13 ??:??:??
|
||||
|
||||
#occupational
|
||||
|
||||
### Questions for Bid Estimators
|
||||
|
||||
Questions for [[pdi-estimating#Bid Estimating|PDI Bid Estimators]].
|
||||
|
||||
#### Exclusions
|
||||
|
||||
When we send proposals with significant exclusions
|
||||
(no lighting control, no demo, no submetering,
|
||||
even when designed and shown on drawings):
|
||||
|
||||
Is there a conversation happening with our customers
|
||||
before they receive our proposal?
|
||||
|
||||
Is it clear they understand what we're excluding?
|
||||
|
||||
# 2025-11-13 20:41:??
|
||||
|
||||
#topic/hobbies/shorthand
|
||||
|
||||
I've decided I've considered learning [[shorthand]]
|
||||
enough times independently
|
||||
that I would likely benefit from it.
|
||||
|
||||
I added [[leslie-et-al_1968_gregg-notehand|a book]]
|
||||
on [[shorthand#Gregg Notehand|Gregg Notehand]]
|
||||
to my calibre library.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user