vault backup: 2025-11-11 12:22:56
This commit is contained in:
+36
-8
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- authorship/original
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- original-format/typewritten-print
|
||||
- original-format/digital-text
|
||||
- original-format/typewritten-print
|
||||
- type/daily
|
||||
title: 2025-11-10
|
||||
---
|
||||
@@ -55,19 +55,19 @@ when I noticed a strange paragraph:
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Drop down ceiling is technically "Exposed" (the real term should be accessable),
|
||||
> so Romex and SER is not permited. Will need to use MC.
|
||||
>
|
||||
>
|
||||
> > [!image]
|
||||
> > ### 334.12 Uses Not Permitted.
|
||||
> >
|
||||
> >
|
||||
> > #### 334.12(A) Types NM and NMC.
|
||||
> >
|
||||
> >
|
||||
> > Types NM and NMC cables shall not be permitted as follows:
|
||||
> >
|
||||
> >
|
||||
> > 1. In any dwelling or structure not specifically
|
||||
> > permitted in 334.10(1), (2), (3)
|
||||
> > permitted in 334.10(1), (2), (3)
|
||||
> >
|
||||
> > 2. ==Exposed in dropped or suspended ceilings==
|
||||
> > in other than one- and two-family and multifamily dwellings
|
||||
> > in other than one- and two-family and multifamily dwellings
|
||||
|
||||
This analysis of 334.12(A)(2) is flawed.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ can be paraphrased as follows:
|
||||
> in accessible spaces above suspended ceilings,
|
||||
> _except in buildings containing one or more dwelling units._
|
||||
|
||||
The prohibition of 334.12(A)(2) *never* applies to apartments or condos,
|
||||
The prohibition of 334.12(A)(2) _never_ applies to apartments or condos,
|
||||
And only applies to hotels and dormitories on a basis of AHJ interpretation
|
||||
(See [[multi-family-dwellings#Are Hotels Multifamily Dwellings?]]).
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -106,3 +106,31 @@ I'm certain I misuse it frequently.
|
||||
It _does not_ include power conductors to
|
||||
[[nfpa-70_100_definitions#Utilization Equipment.|utilization equipment]],
|
||||
those are a [[nfpa-70_100_definitions#Branch Circuit.|branch circuit]]
|
||||
|
||||
## 2025-11-10 20:00 --- Monday Evening, Before Bed
|
||||
|
||||
Today while (a peer) and I were walking, he asked
|
||||
me what I thought of his qualities as an estimator.
|
||||
I told him I think he has the right of it, that having beliefs
|
||||
about what's correct that don't change just because
|
||||
a senior says they should, is a good sign.
|
||||
|
||||
I can't remember now if I knew it before today,
|
||||
but my relationship with Dale, my former manager,
|
||||
while never "good", was much improved when I started
|
||||
pushing back on his direction and feedback. I became
|
||||
an estimator where before I was just someone who
|
||||
could estimate for him. He hated it, and let me know,
|
||||
but I never felt more sure of my position.
|
||||
|
||||
Estimating is not a field where you get ahead
|
||||
by being more technically skilled or efficient.
|
||||
|
||||
You distinguish yourself by convincing your superiors
|
||||
that you understand the objective and how to achieve
|
||||
it. The best estimators---as measured by compensation
|
||||
package---are not doing takeoff, they're
|
||||
telling other estimators what to take off and how.
|
||||
|
||||
Conquer your self-doubt. Tell your boss they're
|
||||
wrong and stupid and they should feel bad. Profit.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user