vault backup: 2026-04-06 17:20:14
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,560 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
title: How to Measure Anything in Project Management
|
||||
tags: []
|
||||
author: Douglas W. Hubbard & Dr. Alexander Budzier & Andreas Bang Leed
|
||||
---
|
||||
# How to Measure Anything in Project Management
|
||||
|
||||
## Foreword
|
||||
|
||||
## Preface
|
||||
|
||||
## Acknowledgments
|
||||
|
||||
## About the Authors
|
||||
|
||||
## Chapter 1 --- A World-scale Risk and a World-scale Opportunity
|
||||
|
||||
### The Size of Projects
|
||||
|
||||
### The Size of Project Problems
|
||||
|
||||
### Efforts to Fix Projects: The Emergence of Project Management
|
||||
|
||||
### A Path Forward: The Meta-Project
|
||||
|
||||
### Notes
|
||||
|
||||
## Chapter 2 --- A Measurement Primer for Project Management
|
||||
|
||||
### The Concept of Measurement
|
||||
|
||||
#### A Definition of Measurement
|
||||
|
||||
#### Definition
|
||||
|
||||
#### Measurement and Probabilities for Practical Decision-making
|
||||
|
||||
#### Are Scales Really Measurements?
|
||||
|
||||
### The Object of Measurement
|
||||
|
||||
#### What Do You See When You See More of It?
|
||||
|
||||
#### Why Do You Care?
|
||||
|
||||
### The Methods of Measurement
|
||||
|
||||
#### Statistical Significance: What's the Significance?
|
||||
|
||||
#### Small Samples Tell You More Than You Think
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Rule of Five
|
||||
|
||||
### Other Sources of Measurement Aversion
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Cost Objection
|
||||
|
||||
#### Measurements Change What Is Being Measured
|
||||
|
||||
#### Statistics Can Prove Anything
|
||||
|
||||
#### Ethical Objections to Measurement
|
||||
|
||||
### Notes
|
||||
|
||||
## Chapter 3 --- How We Know What Works
|
||||
|
||||
### Skepticism for Project Managers
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Analysis Placebo
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Problem of Feedback and Learning
|
||||
|
||||
### How to Test Methods
|
||||
|
||||
#### Controlled Experiments and Component Testing
|
||||
|
||||
#### Evaluating Sources
|
||||
|
||||
### The Performance of Quantitative Methods
|
||||
|
||||
#### Experts Versus Algorithms
|
||||
|
||||
#### The <span class="class_s9dd">Exsupero Ursus</span> Fallacy: Algorithm Aversion
|
||||
|
||||
#### Potential Reasons for <span class="class_s9dd">Exsupero Ursus</span>
|
||||
|
||||
### Improving the Human Expert
|
||||
|
||||
#### Calibrating the Expert
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Expert Consistency Component
|
||||
|
||||
#### Collaboration on Estimates
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Decomposition Component
|
||||
|
||||
### A Summary of Research on Other Project Planning and Management Methods
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference Class Forecasting
|
||||
|
||||
#### Various Project Management Methods
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Performance of Monte Carlo Simulations
|
||||
|
||||
### Notes
|
||||
|
||||
## Chapter 4 --- The Project Decision Model: The Reason for Measurements
|
||||
|
||||
### Two Types of Project Measurements
|
||||
|
||||
#### Proto-purpose Discovery Measurements
|
||||
|
||||
#### Decision-driven Measurements
|
||||
|
||||
#### Unproductive Incentives vs. Measurements
|
||||
|
||||
### Decisions Before: Thinking Slow
|
||||
|
||||
#### Exploration vs. Exploitation
|
||||
|
||||
#### Tracking the Outside World
|
||||
|
||||
#### Choosing How to Run the Project
|
||||
|
||||
### How Models Indicate What to Measure
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Expected Value of Information: A Simple Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Measurement Inversion: Measuring the Wrong Things
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Value of Imperfect Measurements
|
||||
|
||||
### An Aspirational Model
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Rise of Digital Twins
|
||||
|
||||
#### Digital Twins in Project Management
|
||||
|
||||
#### A Practical Path Forward
|
||||
|
||||
### Notes
|
||||
|
||||
## Chapter 5 --- Project Uncertainty and Risk: A Primer
|
||||
|
||||
### Basic Concepts and Definitions
|
||||
|
||||
#### Uncertainty as a Probability Distribution
|
||||
|
||||
#### Risk: A Special Case of Uncertainty
|
||||
|
||||
#### Definitions for Uncertainty, Risk, and Their Measurements
|
||||
|
||||
### The Problem with Current Methods
|
||||
|
||||
#### Why Risk "Scores" Don't Work
|
||||
|
||||
#### How the Risk Matrix Makes Scores Worse
|
||||
|
||||
### A Quantitative Risk Model: Starting <span class="class_s9dd">Very</span> Simple
|
||||
|
||||
#### The One-for-One Substitution
|
||||
|
||||
#### Monte Carlo Mechanics: A Brief Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
### Supporting Decisions
|
||||
|
||||
#### A Return on Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
#### How Much Risk Do You Tolerate?
|
||||
|
||||
#### Risk Versus Return: The Powerful Theory of Utility
|
||||
|
||||
### Simple Tools for Measuring Uncertainty and Risk
|
||||
|
||||
#### A First Estimate of a Discrete Probability
|
||||
|
||||
#### A First Estimate of a Continuous Probability
|
||||
|
||||
### Final Clarifications
|
||||
|
||||
#### Case Examples for What Probability Means
|
||||
|
||||
#### Uncertainty Versus Risk Versus Opportunity
|
||||
|
||||
#### Epistemic Versus Aleatory Uncertainty
|
||||
|
||||
#### Even More Ordinal Scales
|
||||
|
||||
#### Risk as Governance or Compliance
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Problem of "Black Swans"
|
||||
|
||||
#### Some Items That Aren't Really Risks
|
||||
|
||||
### More Improvements to Come
|
||||
|
||||
### Notes
|
||||
|
||||
## Chapter 6 --- Calibrated Subjective Probability Estimates
|
||||
|
||||
### Introduction to Subjective Probability
|
||||
|
||||
#### Two Extremes of Subjective Confidence
|
||||
|
||||
### Calibration Exercise
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Calibration Exercises
|
||||
|
||||
#### Evaluating Performance and Typical Results
|
||||
|
||||
### Improving Calibration
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Equivalent Bet
|
||||
|
||||
#### More Techniques
|
||||
|
||||
#### More Advanced Calibration Topics to Come
|
||||
|
||||
### The Effects of Calibration
|
||||
|
||||
### Conceptual Obstacles to Calibration
|
||||
|
||||
#### Conflating Uncertainty with Knowing Nothing
|
||||
|
||||
#### Hypotheses That Contradict the Data
|
||||
|
||||
#### Objections Based on the Philosophical Debate in Statistics
|
||||
|
||||
### Notes
|
||||
|
||||
## Chapter 7 --- Cost and Schedule Measurements
|
||||
|
||||
### The Big Plan Versus Iteration: Meta-measurements of Common Estimation Methods
|
||||
|
||||
### Top-down Estimations: Reference Class Forecasting
|
||||
|
||||
### Bottom-up Forecasting with Monte Carlo
|
||||
|
||||
#### A Deterministic View of Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
#### Probability Distributions for Project Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
#### Correlations
|
||||
|
||||
#### Multiple Prerequisites and Stochastic Critical Paths
|
||||
|
||||
#### Parade of Trades
|
||||
|
||||
### Comparing Top-Down and Bottom-Up: Case Examples
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Swedish Nuclear Waste Program
|
||||
|
||||
#### High-speed Rail
|
||||
|
||||
### How to Improve the Models
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Granularity of the Monte Carlo Model
|
||||
|
||||
#### Distributions and Biases
|
||||
|
||||
#### Correlations
|
||||
|
||||
#### Improving the RCF with Monte Carlo
|
||||
|
||||
### Notes
|
||||
|
||||
## Chapter 8 --- Betting on Benefits
|
||||
|
||||
### Meta-Measurements of Benefits
|
||||
|
||||
#### How Much Should Benefits Be to Justify a Project?
|
||||
|
||||
#### Why This May Be Optimistic
|
||||
|
||||
#### Why Measuring Benefits Is Rare
|
||||
|
||||
### Fermi Decompositions for Benefits
|
||||
|
||||
#### Introduction to Fermi
|
||||
|
||||
#### Some Example Decompositions
|
||||
|
||||
### Monetizing Benefits
|
||||
|
||||
#### Forecasts of Monetary Impacts
|
||||
|
||||
#### Preferences
|
||||
|
||||
#### Quantifying Preferences
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Use of Scores and Multiple Objectives
|
||||
|
||||
#### An Example of Challenging Benefit Measurement: Biodiversity
|
||||
|
||||
### Measuring What Matters in Projects
|
||||
|
||||
#### A (Slightly) More Realistic Information Value Calculation
|
||||
|
||||
#### The High Information Values for Projects
|
||||
|
||||
#### Getting Started on Measuring What Matters
|
||||
|
||||
### Considering Risk and Return
|
||||
|
||||
#### A Risk Neutral Decision-maker for Projects
|
||||
|
||||
#### Adding Utility Theory to Projects
|
||||
|
||||
#### Some Alternatives Within Utility Math
|
||||
|
||||
#### Are Executives Too Risk Averse for Projects?
|
||||
|
||||
#### The (Apparent) Utility Paradox
|
||||
|
||||
### A Framework and Its Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
#### Findings from Quantitative Analysis of Past Projects
|
||||
|
||||
#### How and When, Not Just Whether
|
||||
|
||||
#### Benefits Are Not Just for Project Approval Decisions
|
||||
|
||||
### Notes
|
||||
|
||||
## Chapter 9 --- Measuring Progress
|
||||
|
||||
### The Progress Problem
|
||||
|
||||
#### Simple Progress, Simple Interventions
|
||||
|
||||
### Earned Value Management
|
||||
|
||||
#### EVM Basics
|
||||
|
||||
#### The XRL Example
|
||||
|
||||
#### Recovery vs. Performance
|
||||
|
||||
#### Forecasting with EVM
|
||||
|
||||
### Progress in Information Projects
|
||||
|
||||
#### Waterfall
|
||||
|
||||
#### Agile and Measurement in Other Software Development Methods
|
||||
|
||||
#### Summarizing Software Metric Difficulties
|
||||
|
||||
### Four Stories and Lessons
|
||||
|
||||
#### Interfaces in a Global Bank Transformation
|
||||
|
||||
#### An Energy Project Front End
|
||||
|
||||
#### Construction Constraints
|
||||
|
||||
#### Testing as Software Checkpoints
|
||||
|
||||
#### Lessons
|
||||
|
||||
### The Remaining Project Simulation
|
||||
|
||||
#### Conditional Reference Class Forecasting (CRCF)
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Bottom-Up Simulation for the Remaining Project
|
||||
|
||||
#### Further Considerations for the RPA
|
||||
|
||||
### Notes
|
||||
|
||||
## Chapter 10 --- More Measurement Methods Made Easy
|
||||
|
||||
### Intuition for the Habitually Scientific
|
||||
|
||||
#### A Jelly Bean Example
|
||||
|
||||
#### A Little Probability Theory
|
||||
|
||||
#### Consequences of Probability Theory
|
||||
|
||||
#### Myths Exposed by Probability Theory
|
||||
|
||||
#### Significant Points About Statistical Significance
|
||||
|
||||
#### Basic Sampling Methods
|
||||
|
||||
#### The "Mathless" Table for Medians
|
||||
|
||||
#### Estimating a Population Proportion
|
||||
|
||||
### Project Cancellation Rates as a Function of Duration
|
||||
|
||||
#### Measuring Population Size
|
||||
|
||||
### Measuring Some Things by Knowing Other Things
|
||||
|
||||
#### Controlled Experiments
|
||||
|
||||
#### Regression
|
||||
|
||||
#### More Advanced Methods of Regression and Classification
|
||||
|
||||
### Estimating the Whole Distribution
|
||||
|
||||
### Summarizing Methods
|
||||
|
||||
#### Brainstorming a Measurement Approach
|
||||
|
||||
#### Data Gathering Methods
|
||||
|
||||
### A Review of Methods in This Chapter
|
||||
|
||||
### Notes on Surveys
|
||||
|
||||
### Notes
|
||||
|
||||
## Chapter 11 --- The Meta-Project: Implementing Better Project Measurements
|
||||
|
||||
### Start with the End in Mind: The Continuous Improvement Process
|
||||
|
||||
#### Measure What Matters
|
||||
|
||||
#### (Real) Skepticism and Meta-measurements
|
||||
|
||||
#### Measuring and Forecasting the Outside World
|
||||
|
||||
#### AI: The Most Important Project Ecosystem Measurement?
|
||||
|
||||
#### More Thinking, Fewer Projects, Bigger Wins
|
||||
|
||||
### Start Your Meta-Project
|
||||
|
||||
#### Examples of Meta-Projects Deliverables: Continuous Improvement
|
||||
|
||||
#### Develop an Initial Team
|
||||
|
||||
#### Assess the Current State of the Project Portfolio
|
||||
|
||||
#### Considerations for the Meta-Project Plan
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Pilot Project
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scaling to the Final Deliverable
|
||||
|
||||
### Organizational Challenges
|
||||
|
||||
#### Resistance to Change
|
||||
|
||||
#### Addressing Organizational Objections to Measurement
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Politics of Measurement
|
||||
|
||||
### Notes
|
||||
|
||||
## Chapter 12 --- A Call to Action for the Industry
|
||||
|
||||
### Call to Action for Project Software Vendors
|
||||
|
||||
#### Put Decisions at the Center
|
||||
|
||||
#### Deal in Uncertainties
|
||||
|
||||
#### Build the User-buyer-builder Federation
|
||||
|
||||
#### Be the Vendor That Measures Its Performance
|
||||
|
||||
#### Be Forward-Looking
|
||||
|
||||
### Call to Action for the Standard-Setting Bodies
|
||||
|
||||
### Call to Action for Consultants, Researchers, and Advisory Firms
|
||||
|
||||
### Big Future Projects
|
||||
|
||||
#### A Mars Mission
|
||||
|
||||
#### Stopping Hurricanes
|
||||
|
||||
#### The Meta-Project
|
||||
|
||||
### Notes
|
||||
|
||||
## Appendix 1 --- Analysis of Survey Responses on Project Management Practices
|
||||
|
||||
### Introduction and Data Overview
|
||||
|
||||
#### Success Metrics: Cost and Schedule Overrun Ratios
|
||||
|
||||
### Overview of Project Management Practices Reported in the Survey
|
||||
|
||||
#### Project Management Methodologies
|
||||
|
||||
#### Cost and Schedule Estimation Methods
|
||||
|
||||
#### Uncertainty and Risk Assessment Tools
|
||||
|
||||
#### Certifications
|
||||
|
||||
### Results
|
||||
|
||||
#### Project Management Methodologies
|
||||
|
||||
#### Cost and Schedule Estimation Methods
|
||||
|
||||
#### Uncertainty and Risk Assessment Tools
|
||||
|
||||
#### Certifications
|
||||
|
||||
#### Interpreting the (Mostly) Statistically Insignificant Results
|
||||
|
||||
## Appendix 2 --- Reference Class Data on Project Cost, Schedule, and Benefit Overruns
|
||||
|
||||
### Relevance of the Data and Reference Class Forecasting
|
||||
|
||||
### Using Historical Data to Improve Estimates -- An Example
|
||||
|
||||
### Notes
|
||||
|
||||
## Appendix 3 --- Selected Distributions
|
||||
|
||||
### Uniform
|
||||
|
||||
### Beta
|
||||
|
||||
### Beta PERT
|
||||
|
||||
### Triangular
|
||||
|
||||
### Binary
|
||||
|
||||
### Normal
|
||||
|
||||
### Lognormal
|
||||
|
||||
### Power Law
|
||||
|
||||
### Truncated Power Law
|
||||
|
||||
### Quantile-parameterized
|
||||
|
||||
### Gamma Poisson
|
||||
|
||||
### Stochastic Information Packet
|
||||
|
||||
## Appendix 4 --- Chapter 6 Calibration Question Answers
|
||||
|
||||
### Appendix Answers to Confidence Interval Questions
|
||||
|
||||
### Answers to True/False Questions
|
||||
|
||||
## Appendix 5 --- Measuring Biodiversity
|
||||
|
||||
### The Benefits of Biodiversity
|
||||
|
||||
### Variables to Measure for Biodiversity
|
||||
|
||||
### Notes
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: 2026-04-06T16:23:54-04:00
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
title: 2026-04-06 16:23:54
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- authorship/original
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/periodic/timestamped
|
||||
dg-publish: true
|
||||
date-created: 2026-04-06T16:23:54-04:00
|
||||
daily: "[[2026-04-06]]"
|
||||
weekly: "[[2026-W15]]"
|
||||
monthly: "[[2026-04]]"
|
||||
quarterly: "[[2026-Q2]]"
|
||||
yearly: "[[2026]]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
# 2026-04-06 16:23:54
|
||||
|
||||
[tksheet](https://pypi.org/project/tksheet/) is a spreadsheet library for tkinter.
|
||||
|
||||
It's likely a streamlined `takeoff-calcs.xlsx` clone
|
||||
could be made easily with `tksheet`,
|
||||
and experimental estimating patterns
|
||||
like my graph editor `edger`
|
||||
could be added as plugins.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: 2026-04-06T16:47:44-04:00
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
title: 2026-04-06 16:47:44
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- authorship/original
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/periodic/timestamped
|
||||
dg-publish: true
|
||||
date-created: 2026-04-06T16:47:44-04:00
|
||||
daily: "[[2026-04-06]]"
|
||||
weekly: "[[2026-W15]]"
|
||||
monthly: "[[2026-04]]"
|
||||
quarterly: "[[2026-Q2]]"
|
||||
yearly: "[[2026]]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
# 2026-04-06 16:47:44
|
||||
|
||||
## Nirvana Fallacy
|
||||
|
||||
The [nirvana fallacy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nirvana_fallacy)
|
||||
also called the "perfect solution fallacy"
|
||||
is the mistake made when a solution proposed to replace one existing
|
||||
is judged against a hypothetical perfect solution
|
||||
rather than the solution in current use.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!quote] Harold Demsetz "Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint" (1969)[^1]
|
||||
> The view that now pervades much public policy economics
|
||||
> implicitly presents the relevant choice
|
||||
> as between an ideal norm and an existing "imperfect" institutional arrangement.
|
||||
> This _nirvana_ approach differs considerably
|
||||
> from a _comparative institution_ approach
|
||||
> in which the relevant choice is between alternative real institutional arrangements.
|
||||
|
||||
[^1]: Harold Demsetz
|
||||
"Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint"
|
||||
_The Journal of Law and Economics_
|
||||
Volume 12, Number 1
|
||||
(April 1969)
|
||||
[doi:10.1086/466657](https://doi.org/10.1086%2F466657)
|
||||
|
||||
The "_[[the-failure-of-risk-management#_Exsupero Ursus_|exsupero ursus]]_ fallacy"
|
||||
as coined by Douglas Hubbard in [[hubbard_2020_failure]][^2]
|
||||
describes the same problem.
|
||||
|
||||
[^2]: Or earlier? I can't recall.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user