vault backup: 2026-04-06 17:20:14
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: 2026-04-06T16:23:54-04:00
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
title: 2026-04-06 16:23:54
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- authorship/original
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/periodic/timestamped
|
||||
dg-publish: true
|
||||
date-created: 2026-04-06T16:23:54-04:00
|
||||
daily: "[[2026-04-06]]"
|
||||
weekly: "[[2026-W15]]"
|
||||
monthly: "[[2026-04]]"
|
||||
quarterly: "[[2026-Q2]]"
|
||||
yearly: "[[2026]]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
# 2026-04-06 16:23:54
|
||||
|
||||
[tksheet](https://pypi.org/project/tksheet/) is a spreadsheet library for tkinter.
|
||||
|
||||
It's likely a streamlined `takeoff-calcs.xlsx` clone
|
||||
could be made easily with `tksheet`,
|
||||
and experimental estimating patterns
|
||||
like my graph editor `edger`
|
||||
could be added as plugins.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: 2026-04-06T16:47:44-04:00
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
title: 2026-04-06 16:47:44
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- authorship/original
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/periodic/timestamped
|
||||
dg-publish: true
|
||||
date-created: 2026-04-06T16:47:44-04:00
|
||||
daily: "[[2026-04-06]]"
|
||||
weekly: "[[2026-W15]]"
|
||||
monthly: "[[2026-04]]"
|
||||
quarterly: "[[2026-Q2]]"
|
||||
yearly: "[[2026]]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
# 2026-04-06 16:47:44
|
||||
|
||||
## Nirvana Fallacy
|
||||
|
||||
The [nirvana fallacy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nirvana_fallacy)
|
||||
also called the "perfect solution fallacy"
|
||||
is the mistake made when a solution proposed to replace one existing
|
||||
is judged against a hypothetical perfect solution
|
||||
rather than the solution in current use.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!quote] Harold Demsetz "Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint" (1969)[^1]
|
||||
> The view that now pervades much public policy economics
|
||||
> implicitly presents the relevant choice
|
||||
> as between an ideal norm and an existing "imperfect" institutional arrangement.
|
||||
> This _nirvana_ approach differs considerably
|
||||
> from a _comparative institution_ approach
|
||||
> in which the relevant choice is between alternative real institutional arrangements.
|
||||
|
||||
[^1]: Harold Demsetz
|
||||
"Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint"
|
||||
_The Journal of Law and Economics_
|
||||
Volume 12, Number 1
|
||||
(April 1969)
|
||||
[doi:10.1086/466657](https://doi.org/10.1086%2F466657)
|
||||
|
||||
The "_[[the-failure-of-risk-management#_Exsupero Ursus_|exsupero ursus]]_ fallacy"
|
||||
as coined by Douglas Hubbard in [[hubbard_2020_failure]][^2]
|
||||
describes the same problem.
|
||||
|
||||
[^2]: Or earlier? I can't recall.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user