vault backup: 2026-03-03 12:26:29
This commit is contained in:
+21
-2
@@ -22,6 +22,25 @@ With that heuristic,
|
||||
one can closely approximate small dimensions,
|
||||
even without the proper tools.
|
||||
|
||||
## See Also
|
||||
## Realism vs. Instrumentalism
|
||||
|
||||
[[realism-vs-instrumentalism]]
|
||||
Realism holds that the purpose of [scientific research](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Research)
|
||||
is to describe the world as accurately as possible.
|
||||
Instrumentalism (anti-realism) argues that the purpose
|
||||
is to _forecast as accurately as possible_.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!quote] George E. P. Box, British statistician
|
||||
> All models are wrong, but some are useful.[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
[^1]: > [!quote] [[box_1987_empirical-model-building#The Use of Approximating Functions]]
|
||||
> The fact that the polynomial is an approximation
|
||||
> does not necessarily detract from its usefulness
|
||||
> because all models are approximations.
|
||||
> Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!quote] _Opinionated History of Mathematics_, "Did Copernicus steal ideas from Islamic astronomers?" (pp.)
|
||||
> Ptolemy's lunar model is "flawed"
|
||||
> in that it inaccurately describes Luna's distance from Earth,
|
||||
> however Ptolemy only ever used the model to predict eclipses,
|
||||
> which the model does very well.
|
||||
> The discrepancy is only a flaw from a realist perspective.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user