vault backup: 2025-11-10 16:55:49
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- authorship/original
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- original-format/digital-text
|
||||
- type/daily
|
||||
title: 2025-11-06
|
||||
---
|
||||
# 2025-11-06
|
||||
|
||||
## 2025-11-06 18:12 "Bad Bid Practice"
|
||||
|
||||
I might be reprimanded for the things I've said about deceptive bid practices
|
||||
were I to repeat them to the wrong person,
|
||||
but I can't, in good conscience, take them back.
|
||||
|
||||
In my previous position,
|
||||
I regularly saw good opportunities lost,
|
||||
perfect jobs turned into absurd overruns,
|
||||
and historied relationships with good customers soured
|
||||
by people trying to play poker instead of just selling a service.
|
||||
|
||||
Now I feel myself sour when I see the same warning signs.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!quote] Proverbs 21:6, New International Version
|
||||
> A fortune made by a lying tongue
|
||||
> is a fleeting vapor and a deadly snare
|
||||
|
||||
> [!quote] Robert Palmer, "Every Kinda People"
|
||||
> There is no profit in deceit
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Honest men know that
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Revenge does not taste sweet
|
||||
|
||||
When you bill your customer to provide scope
|
||||
that they thought they already paid for,
|
||||
they don't say "Touche" and move on,
|
||||
they ask themselves what they've done for you,
|
||||
what they're doing, and if you still deserve it.
|
||||
**You are cashing out on good will.**
|
||||
|
||||
> How upset would you be paying fifty dollars for an oil change,
|
||||
> just to be billed another fifty for the cost of the oil and filter?
|
||||
> Would you ever go back to that shop?
|
||||
|
||||
When you take from a contractors profits,
|
||||
they _will_ make sure you don't keep all of it,
|
||||
whether intentionally or not.
|
||||
|
||||
Harsh words of lost profits reach the field immediately,
|
||||
and they only get harsher on the way down.
|
||||
Your superintendent _was_ golf buddies with the contractor's.
|
||||
Now yours is buried in QA and safety paperwork
|
||||
that they used to get away with pencil-whipping.
|
||||
|
||||
Estimators may account themselves clever
|
||||
when they sell toggle switches as lighting control
|
||||
or conduit as equipment grounding
|
||||
but they're only playing at law.
|
||||
|
||||
It is... _inadvisable_ to get into a dispute over contract terminology
|
||||
with an organization that---necessarily---has a larger legal department than you.
|
||||
Much more so when your basis for complaint is a typo-ridden checklist
|
||||
written by estimators with degrees in anything but law,
|
||||
rarely construction management,
|
||||
or even nothing at all.
|
||||
|
||||
I don't mean to disparage my well-meaning peers,
|
||||
(that last category includes myself)
|
||||
I only mean to say that we don't seem to be asking
|
||||
the first question that should come to mind
|
||||
when writing a document that could end up in court:
|
||||
"How would I look explaining this to a lawyer?"
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user