vault backup: 2026-04-12 02:38:27
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
title: Courtier's Reply
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- authorship/original
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
- type/encyclopedia-entry
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Courtier's Reply
|
||||
|
||||
A [courtier's reply](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courtier%27s_reply)
|
||||
is a dismissal of an argument
|
||||
on the grounds that the arguer lacks the authority
|
||||
(knowledge, credentials, training, etc.)
|
||||
to offer any criticism at all.
|
||||
|
||||
The term was coined by Paul Zachary Myers as user pharyngula
|
||||
in reference to _The Emperor's New Clothes_
|
||||
in the eponymous article ["The Courtier's Reply"](https://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/12/24/the-courtiers-reply)
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
|
||||
If, observing a bridge actively collapsing under the cars above it,
|
||||
you suggest that some error may have been made
|
||||
by the structural engineers responsible for designing or maintaining it,
|
||||
and your peer replies,
|
||||
"Keep your speculation to yourself,
|
||||
you don't know the first thing about their discipline,"
|
||||
and in that they are correct,
|
||||
they have given a courtier's reply.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user