61 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
61 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id:
|
|
aliases: []
|
|
title: 2026-01-13
|
|
tags:
|
|
- authorship/original
|
|
- destiny/permanent
|
|
- status/draft
|
|
- type/daily
|
|
---
|
|
# 2026-01-13
|
|
|
|
## 2026-01-13 11:28
|
|
|
|
### 2100 Crystal Drive ConEst Manager Review
|
|
|
|
#### Josh's Review Order
|
|
|
|
1. Backwards from Final Pricing through rest of closeout,
|
|
1. Equipment: Cost = 1% of total cost - systems quotes?
|
|
2. briefly check Extension,
|
|
3. Takeoff:
|
|
1. Feeders
|
|
2. Subfeeds
|
|
3. Units
|
|
|
|
> [!failure]
|
|
> Quad USB's in Units were taken off as standard receptacles.
|
|
|
|
#### Lighting Control
|
|
|
|
Follow up to [[2026-01-09#Lighting Control]]
|
|
|
|
Josh stated my takeoff was correct per drawings,
|
|
but that concessions would need to be made for the scope
|
|
as sold by [[pdi-estimating#Bid Estimating|Bid]].
|
|
At his direction I've removed dimming from BOH and corridor spaces.
|
|
The remaining takeoff will remain,
|
|
a $4/sf budget for a lighting control system for those areas was added.
|
|
|
|
I stated that our proposal was deceptive
|
|
for stating lighting control was included
|
|
to which Josh agreed.
|
|
|
|
2021 IECC applies.
|
|
|
|
Josh wants [[pre-takeoff-confirmation]]
|
|
to ask if lighting control is "as shown" or "to code",
|
|
I objected that "to code" as interpreted by Bid
|
|
is not necessarily _to code_ in truth.
|
|
Truly, they need to just tell us what they included.
|
|
The customer would appreciate it too, I'm sure.
|
|
|
|
#### Bonus Incentivized Inter-Departmental Conflict
|
|
|
|
During the review a ~~project manager~~ came to Josh
|
|
to ask for a revision to a WBS
|
|
|
|
> [!aside]
|
|
> Sunset WBS: Engineer did not approve aluminum EMT
|