35 lines
1.0 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
1.0 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id: 2026-02-04T17:02:00-05:00
|
|
aliases: []
|
|
title: 2026-02-04 17:02:00
|
|
tags:
|
|
- authorship/original
|
|
- destiny/permanent
|
|
- status/draft
|
|
- type/timestamped
|
|
- occupational/takeoff
|
|
dg-publish: true
|
|
daily: "[[2026-02-04]]"
|
|
---
|
|
# 2026-02-04 17:02:00
|
|
|
|
While observing takeoff for
|
|
[[electrical-takeoff#Unit Condensing Units|unit condensing units]],
|
|
the project engineer expressed confusion
|
|
at the process of calculating average horizontal length,
|
|
expressing that it was more complicated than they expected
|
|
considering takeoff procedure for similar processes.
|
|
The PE asked why we would not simply use the maximum
|
|
so that we would not risk having too little overall.
|
|
|
|
Their expectation surprised me,
|
|
since it is intuitive to me
|
|
that there must be some limit to the logic of "covering it",
|
|
since it is always within our power to add contingency,
|
|
and especially because---if anything---
|
|
I feel that our procedures tend towards
|
|
the upper end of reasonable ECI.
|
|
(see [[value-of-information.jpg]])
|
|
|
|
My response was not well formulated.
|