116 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown
116 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id:
|
|
aliases: []
|
|
title: 2026-01-12
|
|
tags:
|
|
- authorship/original
|
|
- destiny/permanent
|
|
- status/draft
|
|
- type/periodic/daily
|
|
dg-publish: true
|
|
---
|
|
# 2026-01-12
|
|
|
|
## 2026-01-12 10:00
|
|
|
|
### ECH3 Executed Contract Revision WBS
|
|
|
|
For Executed Contract Revisions, Bid GP% must be maintained.
|
|
In this case a negative variance was added to the buyout budget
|
|
in order to compensate for an increase in permit fee coverage.
|
|
|
|
## 2026-01-12 10:42
|
|
|
|
### Woodbrook Executed Contract Revision Takeoff Check
|
|
|
|
#### Unit Dishwasher/Disposal
|
|
|
|
Drawings show 2 separate duplex receptacles for dishwasher and disposal
|
|
Takeoff used `DW & DISPOSAL DUAL CIR - ...`,
|
|
which includes only one receptacle.
|
|
|
|
According to Joel this takeoff is correct for the scenario.
|
|
|
|
## 2026-01-12 12:23
|
|
|
|
Travelling with Brian Smarslok and Joel Jansen on [[2026-01-15]]
|
|
to visit [[#Woodbury Heights|an awarded project]] in New Jersey.
|
|
Flying from TPA to PHL, departure @ 7:00AM.
|
|
We'll be meeting with the developer, [Greystar](https://www.greystar.com/).
|
|
|
|
### Woodbury Heights
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
project-name: GSC Ltd. Woodbury Heights (aka Academy Pointe)
|
|
sector: Residential
|
|
market-type: Apartment
|
|
bldg-type: Garden
|
|
construction-method: Wood Frame
|
|
construction-type: V
|
|
unit-wiring-method: Romex
|
|
code-data: NEC2020
|
|
mech-system: Split Dx
|
|
buildings: 9
|
|
floors: 3
|
|
units: 234
|
|
gross-area: 266,272
|
|
area-by-type:
|
|
- exterior-amenity: 12,306
|
|
- interior-amenity: 5,031
|
|
- garage: 3,788
|
|
- saleable: 223,172
|
|
division: MA 1
|
|
geographic-region: Northeast
|
|
metro-area: New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA
|
|
municipality-or-ahj: City of Woodbury
|
|
power-company: PSE&G
|
|
stakeholders:
|
|
- developer: Greystar (HQ - Charleston, SC)
|
|
architect: LS3P Associates Ltd
|
|
electrical-engineer: Hurst Engineering
|
|
contract-value: 2,305,000.00
|
|
start-date: 2025-05-01
|
|
end-date: 2026-08-26
|
|
duration: 11 months
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### GP Variance
|
|
|
|
> [!info]
|
|
> "GP%" is **margin** (see [[markup-vs-margin]]).
|
|
|
|
The job appears to be doing poorly, at current GP variance of -$299,356.
|
|
|
|
About $93,000.00 profit on a $2,391,378 job (~3% margin, down from 16.4% as bid).
|
|
|
|
Intend to ask Joel what was missed if he knows,
|
|
and more generally if he has a strategy for figuring out,
|
|
between BPM, The Hub, and however many other places we can look.
|
|
|
|
I doubt very seriously that mismanagement
|
|
can be blamed for any significant portion of variance that extreme.
|
|
|
|
## 2026-01-12 13:02
|
|
|
|
**Dry utilities:** utilities other than "wet" utilities (water, sewer, stormwater),
|
|
namely power, data, and natural gas.
|
|
|
|
## 2026-01-12 13:02
|
|
|
|
Joel attributes the [[#GP Variance|apparent variance]] to
|
|
1. missed Polaris lugs for feeders for one building,
|
|
2. insufficient budget for equipment rental, and
|
|
3. upfront costs already paid (construction is 50% complete).
|
|
|
|
He also said that operations accused ConEst
|
|
of providing insufficient length for subfeeds,
|
|
which he said was true,
|
|
but not to the extent accused
|
|
(only ~600ft missed total).
|
|
|
|
The award WBS shows $32,382 for equipment rental
|
|
|
|
I'm dubious of all these explanations,
|
|
but I don't have another one.
|
|
I can't find the ConEst folder or Accubid file.
|