Files
zmVault/2026-01-12.md
T

126 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown

---
id:
aliases: []
title: 2026-01-12
tags:
- authorship/original
- destiny/permanent
- status/draft
- type/periodic/daily
dg-publish: true
---
# 2026-01-12
## 2026-01-12 10:00:??
#occupational
### ECH3 Executed Contract Revision WBS
For Executed Contract Revisions, Bid GP% must be maintained.
In this case a negative variance was added to the buyout budget
in order to compensate for an increase in permit fee coverage.
## 2026-01-12 10:42:30
#occupational
### Woodbrook Executed Contract Revision Takeoff Check
#### Unit Dishwasher/Disposal
Drawings show 2 separate duplex receptacles for dishwasher and disposal
Takeoff used `DW & DISPOSAL DUAL CIR - ...`,
which includes only one receptacle.
According to Joel this takeoff is correct for the scenario.
## 2026-01-12 12:23:??
#occupational
Travelling with Brian Smarslok and Joel Jansen on [[2026-01-15]]
to visit [[#Woodbury Heights|an awarded project]] in New Jersey.
Flying from TPA to PHL, departure @ 7:00AM.
We'll be meeting with the developer, [Greystar](https://www.greystar.com/).
### Woodbury Heights
```yaml
project-name: GSC Ltd. Woodbury Heights (aka Academy Pointe)
sector: Residential
market-type: Apartment
bldg-type: Garden
construction-method: Wood Frame
construction-type: V
unit-wiring-method: Romex
code-data: NEC2020
mech-system: Split Dx
buildings: 9
floors: 3
units: 234
gross-area: 266,272
area-by-type:
- exterior-amenity: 12,306
- interior-amenity: 5,031
- garage: 3,788
- saleable: 223,172
division: MA 1
geographic-region: Northeast
metro-area: New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA
municipality-or-ahj: City of Woodbury
power-company: PSE&G
stakeholders:
- developer: Greystar (HQ - Charleston, SC)
architect: LS3P Associates Ltd
electrical-engineer: Hurst Engineering
contract-value: 2,305,000.00
start-date: 2025-05-01
end-date: 2026-08-26
duration: 11 months
```
#### GP Variance
> [!info]
> "GP%" is **margin** (see [[markup-vs-margin]]).
The job appears to be doing poorly, at current GP variance of -$299,356.
About $93,000.00 profit on a $2,391,378 job (~3% margin, down from 16.4% as bid).
Intend to ask Joel what was missed if he knows,
and more generally if he has a strategy for figuring out,
between BPM, The Hub, and however many other places we can look.
I doubt very seriously that mismanagement
can be blamed for any significant portion of variance that extreme.
## 2026-01-12 13:02:??
#topic/construction
**Dry utilities:** utilities other than "wet" utilities (water, sewer, stormwater),
namely power, data, and natural gas.
## 2026-01-12 13:02:??
#occupational
Joel attributes the [[#GP Variance|apparent variance]] to
1. missed Polaris lugs for feeders for one building,
2. insufficient budget for equipment rental, and
3. upfront costs already paid (construction is 50% complete).
He also said that operations accused ConEst
of providing insufficient length for subfeeds,
which he said was true,
but not to the extent accused
(only ~600ft missed total).
The award WBS shows $32,382 for equipment rental
I'm dubious of all these explanations,
but I don't have another one.
I can't find the ConEst folder or Accubid file.