zmVault/lovecraft_1937_writing-weird-fiction.md

---
title: Notes on Writing Weird Fiction
tags:
  - authorship/other
  - exclude-from-word-count
  - status/complete
  - topic/writing
  - type/media/article
authors:
  - Howard Phillips Lovecraft
type: article
year: 1937
up: "[[writing]]"
---
# Notes on Writing Weird Fiction

My reason for writing stories
is to give myself the satisfaction of visualising
more clearly and detailedly and stably
the vague, elusive, fragmentary impressions
of wonder, beauty, and adventurous expectancy
which are conveyed to me by certain sights
(scenic, architectural, atmospheric, etc.),
ideas, occurrences, and images encountered in art and literature.
I choose weird stories because they suit my inclination best---
one of my strongest and most persistent wishes being to achieve, momentarily,
the illusion of some strange suspension or violation
of the galling limitations of time, space, and natural law
which for ever imprison us and frustrate our curiosity
about the infinite cosmic spaces beyond the radius of our sight and analysis.
These stories frequently emphasise the element of horror
because fear is our deepest and strongest emotion,
and the one which best lends itself to the creation of nature-defying illusions.
Horror and the unknown or the strange are always closely connected,
so that it is hard to create a convincing picture
of shattered natural law or cosmic alienage or "outsideness"
without laying stress on the emotion of fear.
The reason why _time_ plays a great part in so many of my tales
is that this element looms up in my mind
as the most profoundly dramatic and grimly terrible thing in the universe.
_Conflict with time_ seems to me the most potent and fruitful theme
in all human expression.

While my chosen form of story-writing
is obviously a special and perhaps a narrow one,
it is none the less a persistent and permanent type of expression,
as old as literature itself.
There will always be a small percentage of persons
who feel a burning curiosity about unknown outer space,
and a burning desire to escape from the prison-house of the known and the real
into those enchanted lands of incredible adventure and infinite possibilities
which dreams open up to us,
and which things like deep woods, fantastic urban towers,
and flaming sunsets momentarily suggest.
These persons include great authors
as well as insignificant amateurs like myself---
Dunsany, Poe, Arthur Machen, M. R. James, Algernon Blackwood,
and Walter de la Mare being typical masters in this field.

As to how I write a story---there is no one way.
Each one of my tales has a different history.
Once or twice I have literally written out a dream;
but usually I start with a mood or idea or image which I wish to express,
and revolve it in my mind until I can think of a good way of embodying it
in some chain of dramatic occurrences capable of being recorded in concrete terms.
I tend to run through a mental list of the basic conditions or situations
best adapted to such a mood or idea or image,
and then begin to speculate on logical and naturally motivated explanations
of the given mood or idea or image
in terms of the basic condition or situation chosen.

The actual process of writing is of course
as varied as the choice of theme and initial conception;
but if the history of all my tales were analysed,
it is just possible that the following set of rules
might be deduced from the _average_ procedure:

1. Prepare a synopsis or scenario of events
  in the order of their absolute _occurrence_---
  not the order of their narration.
  Describe with enough fulness to cover all vital points
  and motivate all incidents planned.
  Details, comments, and estimates of consequences
  are sometimes desirable in this temporary framework.

2. Prepare a second synopsis or scenario of events---
  this one in order of _narration_ (not actual occurrence),
  with ample fulness and detail,
  and with notes as to changing perspective, stresses, and climax.
  Change the original synopsis to fit
  if such a change will increase the dramatic force
  or general effectiveness of the story.
  Interpolate or delete incidents at will---
  never being bound by the original conception
  even if the ultimate result be a tale wholly different from that first planned.
  Let additions and alterations be made
  whenever suggested by anything in the formulating process.

3. Write out the story---
  rapidly, fluently, and not too critically---
  following the _second_ or narrative-order synopsis.
  Change incidents and plot
  whenever the developing process seems to suggest such change,
  never being bound by any previous design.
  If the development suddenly reveals new opportunities
  for dramatic effect or vivid storytelling,
  add whatever is thought advantageous---
  going back and reconciling the early parts to the new plan.
  Insert and delete whole sections if necessary or desirable,
  trying different beginnings and endings until the best arrangement is found.
  But be sure that all references throughout the story are thoroughly reconciled with the final design.
  Remove all possible superfluities---
  words, sentences, paragraphs, or whole episodes or elements---
  observing the usual precautions about the reconciling of all references.

4. Revise the entire text,
  paying attention to vocabulary, syntax,
  rhythm of prose, proportioning of parts, niceties of tone,
  grace and convincingness of transitions
  (scene to scene, slow and detailed action
  to rapid and sketchy time-covering action
  and vice versa. . . . etc., etc., etc.),
  effectiveness of beginning, ending, climaxes, etc.,
  dramatic suspense and interest, plausibility and atmosphere,
  and various other elements.

5. Prepare a neatly typed copy---
  not hesitating to add final revisory touches where they seem in order.

The first of these stages is often purely a mental one---
a set of conditions and happenings being worked out in my head,
and never set down until I am ready to prepare a detailed synopsis of events in order of narration.
Then, too, I sometimes begin even the actual writing
before I know how I shall develop the idea---
this beginning forming a problem to be motivated and exploited.

There are, I think, four distinct types of weird story;
one expressing a _mood or feeling,_
another expressing a _pictorial conception,_
a third expressing a _general situation, condition, legend, or intellectual conception,_
and a fourth explaining a _definite tableau or specific dramatic situation or climax._
In another way, weird tales may be grouped into two rough categories---
those in which the marvel or horror concerns some _condition_ or _phenomenon,_
and those in which it concerns some _action of persons_
in connexion with a bizarre condition or phenomenon.

Each weird story---to speak more particularly of the horror type---
seems to involve five definite elements:
(a) some basic, underlying horror or abnormality---condition, entity, etc.---,
(b) the general effects or bearings of the horror,
(c) the mode of manifestation---object embodying the horror and phenomena observed---,
(d) the types of fear-reaction pertaining to the horror, and
(e) the specific effects of the horror in relation to the given set of conditions.

In writing a weird story I always try very carefully
to achieve the right mood and atmosphere,
and place the emphasis where it belongs.
One cannot, except in immature pulp charlatan--fiction,
present an account of impossible, improbable, or inconceivable phenomena
as a commonplace narrative of objective acts and conventional emotions.
Inconceivable events and conditions have a special handicap to overcome,
and this can be accomplished only through the maintenance of a careful realism
in every phase of the story _except_ that touching on the one given marvel.
This marvel must be treated very impressively and deliberately---
with a careful emotional "build-up"---
else it will seem flat and unconvincing.
Being the principal thing in the story,
its mere existence should overshadow the characters and events.
But the characters and events must be consistent and natural
except where they touch the single marvel.
In relation to the central wonder,
the characters should shew the same overwhelming emotion
which similar characters would shew toward such a wonder in real life.
Never have a wonder taken for granted.
Even when the characters are supposed to be accustomed to the wonder
I try to weave an air of awe and impressiveness
corresponding to what the reader should feel.
A casual style ruins any serious fantasy.

Atmosphere, not action, is the great desideratum of weird fiction.
Indeed, all that a wonder story can ever be
is _a vivid picture of a certain type of human mood._
The moment it tries to be anything else
it becomes cheap, puerile, and unconvincing.
Prime emphasis should be given to _subtle suggestion_---
imperceptible hints and touches of selective associative detail
which express shadings of moods
and build up a vague illusion of the strange reality of the unreal.
Avoid bald catalogues of incredible happenings
which can have no substance or meaning
apart from a sustaining cloud of colour and symbolism.

These are the rules or standards which I have followed---
consciously or unconsciously---
ever since I first attempted the serious writing of fantasy.
That my results are successful may well be disputed---
but I feel at least sure that,
had I ignored the considerations mentioned in the last few paragraphs,
they would have been much worse than they are.