vault backup: 2025-10-13 08:18:22

This commit is contained in:
2025-10-13 08:18:22 -04:00
parent 55b9385f62
commit 05608a3696
2 changed files with 47 additions and 227 deletions
+47 -19
View File
@@ -14,6 +14,20 @@ The Failure of Risk Management
(Why It's Broken and How to Fix It)
by Douglas W. Hubbard
## Mentioned Topics and Abbreviations
* Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
* Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT)
* Actuarial Science
* Options Theory (OT)
* Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT)
* Probabalistic Risk Analysis (PRA)
* Value at Risk (VaR)
* Loss-Exceedance Curve (LEC)
* Risk Tolerance
* Certain Monetary Equivalent (CME)
* also called Certainty Equivalent
## Key Takeaways
### Definition of Risk
@@ -39,16 +53,44 @@ that they are "better than nothing".
Expected Value (Probability × Magnitude)
alone can not predict or inform risky decisions,
except for risk-neutral parties.
People and organizations are risk-averse
%% TODO: ... %%
except for risk-neutral parties,
but people and organizations are risk-averse.
Game 1: Which would you pick?
* Option 1: a 100% chance to receive $10,000
* Option 2: a 10% chance to receive $100,000
Most people, being risk-averse, will pick option 1.
Suppose the prize of option 1 were lowered
until you would pick option 2.
That value is your **Certain Monetary Equivalent (CME)**
for a 10% chance of $100,000.
For risk-neutral parties, expected value = CME
Another factor at play here
is that utility is not proportional to monetary value.
Consider these additional choices:
Game 2:
* Option 1: a 100% chance to receive $1,000
* Option 2: a 10% chance to receive $10,000
Game 3:
* Option 1: a 100% chance to receive $100,000
* Option 2: a 10% chance to receive $1,000,000
Assuming that the value of one dollar were linear,
all three games should have the same solution,
but in reality one's answers will differ.
### Expert Opinion Must Be ~~Adjusted~~
Expert opinion is valuable despite its flaws.
%% TODO: ... %%
<!-- TODO: -->
The book details the statistically observable tendency for people
to underestimate risk and to be overconfident in their beliefs.
@@ -127,7 +169,7 @@ EOL translates well to continuous probabilities.
### Single Point Estimates are Problematic
> [!example] p. 232
> [!example] p. 232 pp.
> Hubbard describes a case in the oil industry
> where decent estimating is simplified to the point of serious error
> (collapsing distributions to a single point for "accounting purposes")
@@ -135,20 +177,6 @@ EOL translates well to continuous probabilities.
The case closely mirrors construction estimating.
## Mentioned Topics and Abbreviations
* Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
* Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT)
* Actuarial Science
* Options Theory (OT)
* Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT)
* Probabalistic Risk Analysis (PRA)
* Value at Risk (VaR)
* Loss-Exceedance Curve (LEC)
* Risk Tolerance
* Certain Monetary Equivalent (CME)
* also called Certainty Equivalent
## Critiques
### _Exsupero Ursus_