vault backup: 2025-10-13 08:18:22
This commit is contained in:
@@ -14,6 +14,20 @@ The Failure of Risk Management
|
||||
(Why It's Broken and How to Fix It)
|
||||
by Douglas W. Hubbard
|
||||
|
||||
## Mentioned Topics and Abbreviations
|
||||
|
||||
* Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
|
||||
* Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT)
|
||||
* Actuarial Science
|
||||
* Options Theory (OT)
|
||||
* Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT)
|
||||
* Probabalistic Risk Analysis (PRA)
|
||||
* Value at Risk (VaR)
|
||||
* Loss-Exceedance Curve (LEC)
|
||||
* Risk Tolerance
|
||||
* Certain Monetary Equivalent (CME)
|
||||
* also called Certainty Equivalent
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Takeaways
|
||||
|
||||
### Definition of Risk
|
||||
@@ -39,16 +53,44 @@ that they are "better than nothing".
|
||||
|
||||
Expected Value (Probability × Magnitude)
|
||||
alone can not predict or inform risky decisions,
|
||||
except for risk-neutral parties.
|
||||
People and organizations are risk-averse
|
||||
%% TODO: ... %%
|
||||
except for risk-neutral parties,
|
||||
but people and organizations are risk-averse.
|
||||
|
||||
Game 1: Which would you pick?
|
||||
* Option 1: a 100% chance to receive $10,000
|
||||
* Option 2: a 10% chance to receive $100,000
|
||||
|
||||
Most people, being risk-averse, will pick option 1.
|
||||
Suppose the prize of option 1 were lowered
|
||||
until you would pick option 2.
|
||||
|
||||
That value is your **Certain Monetary Equivalent (CME)**
|
||||
for a 10% chance of $100,000.
|
||||
|
||||
For risk-neutral parties, expected value = CME
|
||||
|
||||
Another factor at play here
|
||||
is that utility is not proportional to monetary value.
|
||||
|
||||
Consider these additional choices:
|
||||
|
||||
Game 2:
|
||||
* Option 1: a 100% chance to receive $1,000
|
||||
* Option 2: a 10% chance to receive $10,000
|
||||
|
||||
Game 3:
|
||||
* Option 1: a 100% chance to receive $100,000
|
||||
* Option 2: a 10% chance to receive $1,000,000
|
||||
|
||||
Assuming that the value of one dollar were linear,
|
||||
all three games should have the same solution,
|
||||
but in reality one's answers will differ.
|
||||
|
||||
### Expert Opinion Must Be ~~Adjusted~~
|
||||
|
||||
Expert opinion is valuable despite its flaws.
|
||||
%% TODO: ... %%
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- TODO: -->
|
||||
|
||||
The book details the statistically observable tendency for people
|
||||
to underestimate risk and to be overconfident in their beliefs.
|
||||
@@ -127,7 +169,7 @@ EOL translates well to continuous probabilities.
|
||||
|
||||
### Single Point Estimates are Problematic
|
||||
|
||||
> [!example] p. 232
|
||||
> [!example] p. 232 pp.
|
||||
> Hubbard describes a case in the oil industry
|
||||
> where decent estimating is simplified to the point of serious error
|
||||
> (collapsing distributions to a single point for "accounting purposes")
|
||||
@@ -135,20 +177,6 @@ EOL translates well to continuous probabilities.
|
||||
|
||||
The case closely mirrors construction estimating.
|
||||
|
||||
## Mentioned Topics and Abbreviations
|
||||
|
||||
* Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
|
||||
* Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT)
|
||||
* Actuarial Science
|
||||
* Options Theory (OT)
|
||||
* Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT)
|
||||
* Probabalistic Risk Analysis (PRA)
|
||||
* Value at Risk (VaR)
|
||||
* Loss-Exceedance Curve (LEC)
|
||||
* Risk Tolerance
|
||||
* Certain Monetary Equivalent (CME)
|
||||
* also called Certainty Equivalent
|
||||
|
||||
## Critiques
|
||||
|
||||
### _Exsupero Ursus_
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user