vault backup: 2025-10-13 08:18:22
This commit is contained in:
-208
@@ -1,208 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"recentFiles": [
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "README",
|
|
||||||
"path": "README.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "estimating-culture",
|
|
||||||
"path": "estimating-culture.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "risk-oriented-estimating",
|
|
||||||
"path": "risk-oriented-estimating.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "optimal-estimating-patterns",
|
|
||||||
"path": "optimal-estimating-patterns.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "consolidate-estimating-thoughts",
|
|
||||||
"path": "consolidate-estimating-thoughts.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "separating-estimating-concerns",
|
|
||||||
"path": "separating-estimating-concerns.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "functional-estimating",
|
|
||||||
"path": "functional-estimating.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "pdi-estimating-systems",
|
|
||||||
"path": "pdi-estimating-systems.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "sleeving",
|
|
||||||
"path": "sleeving.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "alternating-current",
|
|
||||||
"path": "alternating-current.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "feeders",
|
|
||||||
"path": "feeders.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "full-takeoff",
|
|
||||||
"path": "full-takeoff.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "strategy",
|
|
||||||
"path": "strategy.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "estimating-detail",
|
|
||||||
"path": "estimating-detail.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "estimating-methodologies",
|
|
||||||
"path": "estimating-methodologies.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "bid-process-strategy",
|
|
||||||
"path": "bid-process-strategy.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "TODO",
|
|
||||||
"path": "TODO.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "topics",
|
|
||||||
"path": "topics.base"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "monte-carlo-methods",
|
|
||||||
"path": "monte-carlo-methods.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "nfpa-70_450_transformers",
|
|
||||||
"path": "nfpa-70_450_transformers.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "nfpa-70_430_motors",
|
|
||||||
"path": "nfpa-70_430_motors.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "nfpa-70_314_boxes",
|
|
||||||
"path": "nfpa-70_314_boxes.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "nfpa-70_310_conductors_for_general_wiring",
|
|
||||||
"path": "nfpa-70_310_conductors_for_general_wiring.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "nfpa-70_220_load-calculations",
|
|
||||||
"path": "nfpa-70_220_load-calculations.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "nfpa-70_215_feeders",
|
|
||||||
"path": "nfpa-70_215_feeders.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "nfpa-70_210_branch-circuits",
|
|
||||||
"path": "nfpa-70_210_branch-circuits.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "nfpa-70_110_requirements-for-electrical-installations",
|
|
||||||
"path": "nfpa-70_110_requirements-for-electrical-installations.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "realism-vs-instrumentalism",
|
|
||||||
"path": "realism-vs-instrumentalism.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "pdi-estimating",
|
|
||||||
"path": "pdi-estimating.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "estimating-thoughts",
|
|
||||||
"path": "estimating-thoughts.base"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "tasks",
|
|
||||||
"path": "tasks.base"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "subfeeds",
|
|
||||||
"path": "subfeeds.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "supertopics",
|
|
||||||
"path": "supertopics.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "this-notebook",
|
|
||||||
"path": "this-notebook.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "traditional-estimating-methods",
|
|
||||||
"path": "traditional-estimating-methods.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "units",
|
|
||||||
"path": "units.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "uncertainty",
|
|
||||||
"path": "uncertainty.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "windows-setup",
|
|
||||||
"path": "windows-setup.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "backlog",
|
|
||||||
"path": "backlog.base"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "location-vs-scope",
|
|
||||||
"path": "Excalidraw/location-vs-scope.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "raceway-terms",
|
|
||||||
"path": "raceway-terms.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "hvac-calculations",
|
|
||||||
"path": "hvac-calculations.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "owned-models",
|
|
||||||
"path": "owned-models.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "gold-plating",
|
|
||||||
"path": "gold-plating.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "the-failure-of-risk-management",
|
|
||||||
"path": "the-failure-of-risk-management.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "portable-tools",
|
|
||||||
"path": "portable-tools.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "pre-takeoff-confirmation",
|
|
||||||
"path": "pre-takeoff-confirmation.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "risk",
|
|
||||||
"path": "risk.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "project-setup",
|
|
||||||
"path": "project-setup.md"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"basename": "standalone-systems",
|
|
||||||
"path": "standalone-systems.md"
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"omittedPaths": [],
|
|
||||||
"omittedTags": [],
|
|
||||||
"updateOn": "file-open",
|
|
||||||
"omitBookmarks": false
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
@@ -14,6 +14,20 @@ The Failure of Risk Management
|
|||||||
(Why It's Broken and How to Fix It)
|
(Why It's Broken and How to Fix It)
|
||||||
by Douglas W. Hubbard
|
by Douglas W. Hubbard
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Mentioned Topics and Abbreviations
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
|
||||||
|
* Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT)
|
||||||
|
* Actuarial Science
|
||||||
|
* Options Theory (OT)
|
||||||
|
* Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT)
|
||||||
|
* Probabalistic Risk Analysis (PRA)
|
||||||
|
* Value at Risk (VaR)
|
||||||
|
* Loss-Exceedance Curve (LEC)
|
||||||
|
* Risk Tolerance
|
||||||
|
* Certain Monetary Equivalent (CME)
|
||||||
|
* also called Certainty Equivalent
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Key Takeaways
|
## Key Takeaways
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Definition of Risk
|
### Definition of Risk
|
||||||
@@ -39,16 +53,44 @@ that they are "better than nothing".
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
Expected Value (Probability × Magnitude)
|
Expected Value (Probability × Magnitude)
|
||||||
alone can not predict or inform risky decisions,
|
alone can not predict or inform risky decisions,
|
||||||
except for risk-neutral parties.
|
except for risk-neutral parties,
|
||||||
People and organizations are risk-averse
|
but people and organizations are risk-averse.
|
||||||
%% TODO: ... %%
|
|
||||||
|
Game 1: Which would you pick?
|
||||||
|
* Option 1: a 100% chance to receive $10,000
|
||||||
|
* Option 2: a 10% chance to receive $100,000
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Most people, being risk-averse, will pick option 1.
|
||||||
|
Suppose the prize of option 1 were lowered
|
||||||
|
until you would pick option 2.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
That value is your **Certain Monetary Equivalent (CME)**
|
||||||
|
for a 10% chance of $100,000.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For risk-neutral parties, expected value = CME
|
For risk-neutral parties, expected value = CME
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Another factor at play here
|
||||||
|
is that utility is not proportional to monetary value.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Consider these additional choices:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Game 2:
|
||||||
|
* Option 1: a 100% chance to receive $1,000
|
||||||
|
* Option 2: a 10% chance to receive $10,000
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Game 3:
|
||||||
|
* Option 1: a 100% chance to receive $100,000
|
||||||
|
* Option 2: a 10% chance to receive $1,000,000
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Assuming that the value of one dollar were linear,
|
||||||
|
all three games should have the same solution,
|
||||||
|
but in reality one's answers will differ.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Expert Opinion Must Be ~~Adjusted~~
|
### Expert Opinion Must Be ~~Adjusted~~
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Expert opinion is valuable despite its flaws.
|
Expert opinion is valuable despite its flaws.
|
||||||
%% TODO: ... %%
|
|
||||||
|
<!-- TODO: -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The book details the statistically observable tendency for people
|
The book details the statistically observable tendency for people
|
||||||
to underestimate risk and to be overconfident in their beliefs.
|
to underestimate risk and to be overconfident in their beliefs.
|
||||||
@@ -127,7 +169,7 @@ EOL translates well to continuous probabilities.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
### Single Point Estimates are Problematic
|
### Single Point Estimates are Problematic
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
> [!example] p. 232
|
> [!example] p. 232 pp.
|
||||||
> Hubbard describes a case in the oil industry
|
> Hubbard describes a case in the oil industry
|
||||||
> where decent estimating is simplified to the point of serious error
|
> where decent estimating is simplified to the point of serious error
|
||||||
> (collapsing distributions to a single point for "accounting purposes")
|
> (collapsing distributions to a single point for "accounting purposes")
|
||||||
@@ -135,20 +177,6 @@ EOL translates well to continuous probabilities.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
The case closely mirrors construction estimating.
|
The case closely mirrors construction estimating.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Mentioned Topics and Abbreviations
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
|
|
||||||
* Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT)
|
|
||||||
* Actuarial Science
|
|
||||||
* Options Theory (OT)
|
|
||||||
* Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT)
|
|
||||||
* Probabalistic Risk Analysis (PRA)
|
|
||||||
* Value at Risk (VaR)
|
|
||||||
* Loss-Exceedance Curve (LEC)
|
|
||||||
* Risk Tolerance
|
|
||||||
* Certain Monetary Equivalent (CME)
|
|
||||||
* also called Certainty Equivalent
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Critiques
|
## Critiques
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### _Exsupero Ursus_
|
### _Exsupero Ursus_
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user