vault backup: 2026-04-07 17:18:46
This commit is contained in:
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ yearly: "[[2026]]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
# 2026-04-07 07:21:00
|
||||
|
||||
> [!quote] [[how-to-measure-anything-in-project-management#Conflating Uncertainty with Knowing Nothing]]
|
||||
> [!quote] [[hubbard_2025_project-management#Conflating Uncertainty with Knowing Nothing]]
|
||||
> Some objections to providing probability estimates
|
||||
> seem to be based on the presumption
|
||||
> that if they don't know something exactly, they know nothing.
|
||||
@@ -27,11 +27,13 @@ yearly: "[[2026]]"
|
||||
> as opposed to whatever range represents their uncertainty,
|
||||
> however wide that range may be.
|
||||
|
||||
I would not be surprised to hear of an estimator responding this way
|
||||
even after Hubbard's calibration.
|
||||
Hubbard repeatedly conflates estimates of uncertain events
|
||||
with personal estimates of trivia questions with certain answers.
|
||||
These are functionally identical,
|
||||
but _feel_ very different.
|
||||
Hubbard could do better to correct this bias.
|
||||
Hubbard could do better to address this bias.
|
||||
|
||||
If you don't know the answer offhand,
|
||||
imagine it has been lost to time.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user