54 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
54 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id:
|
|
aliases: []
|
|
title: Transparency in Construction Estimating
|
|
tags:
|
|
- authorship/original
|
|
- destiny/permanent
|
|
- status/not-started
|
|
- topic/construction
|
|
- topic/estimating
|
|
- topic/transparency
|
|
- type/cross-topic
|
|
dg-publish: true
|
|
---
|
|
# Transparency in Construction Estimating
|
|
|
|
Cross-topic of [[transparency]] and [[construction-estimating]].
|
|
|
|
## Estimating Ethics
|
|
|
|
### Ethics for the Solicitor
|
|
|
|
Contractors engaging in unethical bidding practices
|
|
can quickly gain a reputation for doing so,
|
|
leading to reduced bid response
|
|
that can be impossible to fully recover from.
|
|
|
|
To ensure a transparent bidding process, one must
|
|
|
|
* divulge all selection criteria to bidders,
|
|
* avoid conflicts of interest,
|
|
* maintain confidentiality of bid submissions, and
|
|
* provide equal access to bidding information.
|
|
|
|
### Ethics for the Bidder
|
|
|
|
Deceptive proposal language is a quick way to get blacklisted.
|
|
|
|
Taking advantage of a customers ignorance of electrical construction
|
|
is particularly reprehensible.
|
|
|
|
> [!example]
|
|
> * Not including consideration for voltage drop
|
|
> * Including standard, line-voltage switching as "lighting control"
|
|
> * Excluding all mechanical disconnects
|
|
|
|
### Terms
|
|
|
|
> [!info] Bid Shopping
|
|
> the practice of sharing a bidder's quote with other prospective vendors
|
|
> in order to solicit lower bids.
|
|
> The competing quote may be legitimate, fabricated,
|
|
> or a non-serious proposal from a colluding vendor.
|